Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Amendment · Amendement

273

Amendement 273 — ART. 5

rejectedFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

12 May 2026

Last action

21 May 2026 · Rejeté

Status

Rejeté

Sponsors

Marie Pochon, Lisa Belluco, Nicolas Bonnet, Nicolas Thierry, Julie Ozenne, Benoît Biteau, Jean-Claude Raux, Pouria Amirshahi, Christine Arrighi, Clémentine Autain, Léa Balage El Mariky, Karim Ben Cheikh, Arnaud Bonnet, Cyrielle Chatelain, Alexis Corbière, Hendrik Davi, Emmanuel Duplessy, Charles Fournier, Marie-Charlotte Garin, Damien Girard, Steevy Gustave, Catherine Hervieu, Jérémie Iordanoff, Julie Laernoes, Tristan Lahais, Benjamin Lucas-Lundy, Sébastien Peytavie, Sandra Regol, Jean-Louis Roumégas, Sandrine Rousseau, François Ruffin, Eva Sas, Sabrina Sebaihi, Danielle Simonnet, Sophie Taillé-Polian, Boris Tavernier

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

21 May 2026

Official sourceShare

Summary

Après la deuxième phrase de l’alinéa 6, insérer la phrase suivante : « La stratégie d’irrigation et du plan de répartition du volume d’eau doit tenir compte des besoins spécifiques des exploitations conduites en agriculture biologique au sens de l’article L. 641‑13 du code rural et de la pêche maritime ».

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 12 May 2026

    Dépôt

    Source: dateDepot

  2. 21 May 2026

    Publication

    Source: datePublication

  3. 21 May 2026

    Rejeté

    Source: dateSort

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.