Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,601 records in EU

All countriesUnited States · 41,750Ireland · 23,761United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,721France · 4,100Netherlands · 3,841Austria · 3,578European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0137decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 October 2015.#I Castellani Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Community trade mark — Revocation procedure — Figurative mark representing a circle — Genuine use of a mark — Extent of use — Article 15(1)(a) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Shape which differs by elements which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark — Rights of the defence — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T-137/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 October 2015

Report· XGCELEX 52015XG1013(01)open

The following information is brought to the attention of ABDOLLAHI Hamed (a.k.a Mustafa Abdullahi), AL-NASSER Abdelkarim Hussein Mohamed, AL YACOUB Ibrahim Salih Mohammed, ARBABSIAR Manssor (a.k.a. Mansour Arbabsiar), IZZ-AL-DIN Hasan (a.k.a GARBAYA, Ahmed, a.k.a. SA-ID, a.k.a. SALWWAN, Samir), MOHAMMED Khalid Shaikh (a.k.a. ALI, Salem, a.k.a. BIN KHALID, Fahd Bin Adballah, a.k.a. HENIN, Ashraf Refaat Nabith, a.k.a. WADOOD, Khalid Adbul), SHAHLAI Abdul Reza (a.k.a Abdol Reza Shala'i, a.k.a. Abd-al Reza Shalai, a.k.a. Abdorreza Shahlai, a.k.a. Abdolreza Shahla'i, a.k.a. Abdul-Reza Shahlaee, a.k.a. Hajj Yusef, a.k.a. Haji Yusif, a.k.a. Hajji Yasir, a.k.a. Hajji Yusif, a.k.a. Yusuf Abu-al-Karkh), SHAKURI Ali Gholam, SOLEIMANI Qasem (a.k.a Ghasem Soleymani, a.k.a Qasmi Sulayman, a.k.a Qasem Soleymani, a.k.a Qasem Solaimani, a.k.a Qasem Salimani, a.k.a Qasem Solemani, a.k.a Qasem Sulaimani, a.k.a Qasem Sulemani), ‘Hizballah Military Wing’ (a.k.a. ‘Hezbollah Military Wing’, a.k.a. ‘Hizbullah Military Wing’, a.k.a. ‘Hizbollah Military Wing’, a.k.a. ‘Hezballah Military Wing’, a.k.a. ‘Hisbollah Military Wing’, a.k.a. ‘Hizbu'llah Military Wing’ a.k.a. ‘Hizb Allah Military Wing’, including the ‘Jihad Council’ (and all units reporting to it, including the External Security Organisation)), International Sikh Youth Federation (ISYF), ‘Ejército De Liberación Nacional’ (‘National Liberation Army’), Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine' — ‘PFLP’, Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine — General Command' (a.k.a. ‘PFLP — General Command’), ‘Fuerzas armadas revolucionarias de Colombia’ — ‘FARC’ (‘Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia’), ‘Sendero Luminoso’ — ‘SL’ (‘Shining Path’) included on the list provided for in Article 2(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (see Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1325)

European Union · Council of the European Union · 13 October 2015

Record· TOCELEX 62014TO0464decided

Order of the General Court (Appeal Chamber) of 8 October 2015.#Risto Nieminen v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2010 and 2011 promotion procedures — Decision not to promote the appellant to grade AD 12 — Right to a fair hearing — Rights of defence — Scope of the judicial review at first instance — Manifest error of assessment — No error of law or distortion — Appeal manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-464/14 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 October 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0360decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 September 2015.#Verein zur Wahrung von Einsatz und Nutzung von Chromtrioxid und anderen Chrom-VI-verbindungen in der Oberflächentechnik eV (VECCO) and Others v European Commission.#REACH — Inclusion of chromium trioxide in the list of substances subject to authorisation — Uses or categories of uses exempted from the authorisation requirement — Concept of ‘existing specific Community legislation imposing minimum requirements relating to the protection of human health or the environment for the use of the substance’ — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration.#Case T-360/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 September 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62014TJ0588decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 September 2015.#Mechadyne International Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Community trade mark — Application for a Community figurative mark FlexValve — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Rights of the defence — Duty to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T-588/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 September 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0161decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 22 September 2015.#First Islamic Investment Bank Ltd v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality.#Case T-161/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 September 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0156decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 September 2015.#Petro Suisse Intertrade Co. SA v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Actions for annulment — Infra-State body — Locus standi and interest in bringing proceedings — Admissibility — Right to be heard — Obligation to notify — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property.#Joined Cases T-156/13 and T-373/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0121decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 September 2015.#Oil Pension Fund Investment Company v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality — Right to hold property — Adjustment of the temporal effects of an annulment.#Case T-121/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0428decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 September 2015.#Iranian Oil Company UK Ltd (IOC-UK) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality — Right to property — Equal treatment and non-discrimination.#Case T-428/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2015

Report· CCCELEX 62014CC0419decided

Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet delivered on 16 September 2015.#WebMindLicenses kft v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Kiemelt Adó- és Vám Főigazgatóság.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 2, 24, 43, 250 and 273 — Place of supply of electronically supplied services — Artificial fixing of that place by means of an arrangement not reflecting economic reality — Abuse of rights — Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 7, 8, 41, 47, 48, 51(1) and 52(1) and (3) — Rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Use by the tax authorities of evidence obtained without the taxable person’s knowledge in the context of a parallel criminal procedure that has not been concluded — Interception of telecommunications and seizure of emails.#Case C-419/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 September 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0687decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2015.#Fliesen-Zentrum Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt Regensburg.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Dumping — Anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of ceramic tiles originating in China — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 917/2011 — Validity — Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Article 2(7)(a) — Normal value — Determination on the basis of the price in a market economy third country — Selection of the appropriate third country — Duty of care — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons — Sampling.#Case C-687/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0569decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2015.#Bricmate AB v Tullverket.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Förvaltningsrätten i Malmö.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Commercial policy — Anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of ceramic tiles originating in China — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 917/2011 — Validity — Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Articles 3(2), 3(3), 3(5), 3(6), 17 and 20(1) — Determination of the injury and of the causal link — Errors of fact and manifest errors of assessment — Obligation to exercise due care — Examination of the evidence sent by a sampled importer — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence.#Case C-569/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0082decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 September 2015.#Panasonic Corp. and MT Picture Display Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Agreements and concerted practices on pricing, market sharing, capacity and production — Rights of the defence — Proof of participation in the cartel — Single and continuous infringement — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Proportionality — Fines — Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-82/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 September 2015

Record· FJCELEX 62014FJ0028decided

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 9 September 2015.#Stéphane De Loecker v European External Action Service.#Civil service — EEAS staff — Temporary staff — Head of delegation to a third country — Breakdown in the relationship of trust — Transfer to EEAS headquarters — Early termination of employment contract — Prior notice — Statement of reasons for a decision — Article 26 of the Staff Regulations– Rights of defence — Right to be heard.#Case F-28/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 September 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0564decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 September 2015.#Ministry of Energy of Iran v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Error of assessment — Breach of fundamental rights — Proportionality.#Case T-564/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 September 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0577decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 September 2015.#National Iranian Oil Company PTE Ltd (NIOC) and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Action for annulment — Infra-State body — Standing to bring proceedings — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Indication and choice of legal basis — Competence of the Council — Principle of foreseeability of European Union acts — Meaning of associated entity — Manifest error of assessment — Rights of defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property.#Case T-577/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 September 2015

Record· TOCELEX 62013TO0441(01)decided

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 September 2015.#Eyad Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Error of assessment — Right to property — Right to respect for private life — Proportionality — Force of res judicata — Time-limit for bringing an action — Admissibility — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-441/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 September 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0045decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 July 2015.#GEA Group AG v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for ESBO/esters heat stabilisers — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Price fixing, market allocation and exchange of commercially sensitive information — Fines — Attribution of the infringement — Shareholding presumption — Duration and proof of the infringement — Limitation period — Duration of the administrative procedure — Reasonable time — Rights of the defence.#Case T-45/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 July 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0047decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 July 2015.#Akzo Nobel NV and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European markets in heat stabilisers — Decision finding two infringements of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Price fixing, market allocation and exchange of commercially sensitive information — Duration of the infringements — Limitation period — Duration of the administrative procedure — Reasonable time — Rights of the defence — Attribution of the infringements — Infringements committed by the subsidiaries, by a partnership without legal personality of its own and by a subsidiary — Calculation of the amount of the fines.#Case T-47/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 July 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0485decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 July 2015.#Akzo Nobel NV and Akcros Chemicals Ltd v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European markets for heat stabilisers — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Infringement committed by a jointly-held subsidiary — Fines — Joint and several liability of the subsidiary and the parent companies — Ten-year limitation period applicable to one of the parent companies — Decision readopted — Reduction of the amount of the fine imposed on one of the parent companies — Attribution to the subsidiary and the other parent company of the obligation to pay the reduced fine — Rights of the defence.#Case T-485/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 July 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62004TJ0425(01)decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 July 2015.#French Republic and Orange v European Commission.#State Aid — Financial measures in favour of France Télécom — Shareholder loan offer — Public declarations by the French State — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market — Absence of extension of the formal investigation procedure — Rights of the defence — Prudent private investor criterion — Normal market conditions — Errors of law — Manifest errors of assessment.#Joined Cases T-425/04 RENV and T-444/04 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 July 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0186decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 June 2015.#Copernicus-Trademarks Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark LUCEA LED — Earlier Community word mark LUCEO — Lack of precedence — Claiming of priority — Priority date entered in the register — Priority documents — Examination by OHIM of its own motion — Rights of the defence.#Case T-186/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 June 2015

Report· XGCELEX 52015XG0623(01)open

The following information is brought to the attention of AL-NASSER, Abdelkarim Hussein Mohamed, AL YACOUB, Ibrahim Salih Mohammed, IZZ-AL-DIN, Hasan (a.k.a GARBAYA, Ahmed, a.k.a. SA-ID, a.k.a. SALWWAN, Samir), MOHAMMED, Khalid Shaikh (a.k.a. ALI, Salem, a.k.a. BIN KHALID, Fahd Bin Adballah, a.k.a. HENIN, Ashraf Refaat Nabith, a.k.a. WADOOD, Khalid Adbul), ‘Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine’ — ‘PFLP’, ‘Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine — General Command’ (a.k.a. ‘PFLP — General Command’), ‘Fuerzas armadas revolucionarias de Colombia’ — ‘FARC’ (‘Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia’) included on the list provided for in Article 2(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (see the Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/513 of 26 March 2015)

European Union · Council of the European Union · 23 June 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0088decided

Judgment of the General Court (Appeal Chamber) of 19 June 2015 (Extracts).#Z v Court of Justice of the European Union.#Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Impartiality on the part of the Civil Service Tribunal — Application for the recusal of a judge — Reassignment — Interests of the service — Rule that the grade must correspond with the post — Article 7(1) of the Staff Regulations — Disciplinary proceedings — Rights of defence.#Case T-88/13 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 June 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0535decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2015.#Vadzim Ipatau v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against the Republic of Belarus — Admissibility — Time-limit for bringing proceedings — Legal aid — Suspensory effect — Effective judicial protection — Rights of the defence — Principle of proportionality.#Case C-535/14 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0655decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 16 June 2015.#FSL Holdings and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European banana market in Italy, Greece and Portugal — Coordination in the fixing of prices — Admissibility of evidence — Rights of defence — Misuse of powers — Evidence of the infringement — Calculation of the fine.#Case T-655/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 June 2015

Report· CCCELEX 62013CC0569decided

Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 May 2015.#Bricmate AB v Tullverket.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Förvaltningsrätten i Malmö.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Commercial policy — Anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of ceramic tiles originating in China — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 917/2011 — Validity — Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Articles 3(2), 3(3), 3(5), 3(6), 17 and 20(1) — Determination of the injury and of the causal link — Errors of fact and manifest errors of assessment — Obligation to exercise due care — Examination of the evidence sent by a sampled importer — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence.#Case C-569/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 May 2015

Report· CCCELEX 62013CC0687decided

Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 21 May 2015.#Fliesen-Zentrum Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt Regensburg.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Dumping — Anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of ceramic tiles originating in China — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 917/2011 — Validity — Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Article 2(7)(a) — Normal value — Determination on the basis of the price in a market economy third country — Selection of the appropriate third country — Duty of care — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons — Sampling.#Case C-687/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 May 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0397decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 May 2015.#Diputación Foral de Bizkaia v European Commission.#State aid — Construction — Aid provided by the Spanish authorities to the company Habidite — Agreements concluded with a view to the establishment of a factory manufacturing construction modules and the delivery of modular houses manufactured by that factory –– Decision declaring the aid unlawful –– Decision declaring the aid partly compatible and partly incompatible with the internal market — No prior notification — Rights of the defence — Obligation to give reasons.#Case T-397/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 May 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0433decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 May 2015.#Petropars Iran Co. and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Plea of illegality — Right to conduct business — Right to property — Protection of public health, security and the environment — Precautionary principle — Proportionality — Rights of defence.#Case T-433/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 May 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0134decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 April 2015.#Polynt SpA and Sitre Srl v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA).#REACH — Identification of certain respiratory sensitisers as substances of very high concern — Equivalent level of concern — Action for annulment — Whether directly concerned — Admissibility — Rights of the defence — Proportionality.#Case T-134/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 April 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0135decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 April 2015.#Hitachi Chemical Europe GmbH and Others v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA).#REACH — Identification of certain respiratory sensitisers as substances of very high concern — Equivalent level of concern — Action for annulment — Whether directly concerned — Admissibility — Rights of the defence — Proportionality.#Case T-135/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 April 2015

PreviousPage 32 of 33Next