PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Immigration

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU

All countriesIreland · 11,956United Kingdom · 9,341United States · 8,983Germany · 4,983European Union · 1,057Netherlands · 478France · 391Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0116_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (sixth chamber) of April 23, 2026.#Ts. e. of beneficiary of unemployment benefits located in a Member State other than the “competent Member State” – Calculation rule not taking into account “exclusively” the salary or professional income received by the person concerned in respect of their last salaried or self-employed activity – National regulation providing for a different calculation rule for people who held their last job in another Member State.#Case C-116/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 April 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0116decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#Ts. E. S. v Direktor na Teritorialno podelenie na Natsionalnia osiguritelen institut - Blagoevgrad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Unemployment benefits – Calculation – Article 62(1) and (2) – Last activity as an employed or self-employed person pursued under the legislation of a Member State – Article 62(3) – Residence of the recipient of unemployment benefits in a Member State other than the ‘competent Member State’ – Calculation rule which does not take into account ‘exclusively’ the salary or professional income received by the person concerned in respect of his or her last activity as an employed or self-employed person – National legislation providing for a different calculation rule for persons who carried out their last employment in another Member State.#Case C-116/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 April 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0150decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#A v Rikoskomisario B.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Immigration policy – Common standards and procedures for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Detention for the purpose of removal – Article 15(5) and (6) – Calculation of the length of the detention already completed – Aggregation of all of the previous periods of detention – Conditions – Enforcement of one and the same return decision – Second sentence of Article 15(3) – Prolonged detention beyond the initial maximum period laid down under Article 15(5) – Review by a judicial authority – National legislation making the implementation of that review contingent on an application by the detained person – Point in time when such a review must be carried out – Consequence where a review is not carried out in good time.#Case C-150/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0150_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#A v Rikoskomisario B.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Immigration policy – Common standards and procedures for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Detention for the purpose of removal – Article 15(5) and (6) – Calculation of the length of the detention already completed – Aggregation of all of the previous periods of detention – Conditions – Enforcement of one and the same return decision – Second sentence of Article 15(3) – Prolonged detention beyond the initial maximum period laid down under Article 15(5) – Review by a judicial authority – National legislation making the implementation of that review contingent on an application by the detained person – Point in time when such a review must be carried out – Consequence where a review is not carried out in good time.#Case C-150/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0633_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 January 2026.#F.F. v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Equal treatment – Aggregation of periods – Article 58 – Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons – Invalidity benefits – Supplement in order to guarantee receipt of the statutory minimum invalidity benefit – Stricter conditions relating to the contribution period for workers who have exercised their right to freedom of movement.#Case C-633/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0633decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 January 2026.#F.F. v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Equal treatment – Aggregation of periods – Article 58 – Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons – Invalidity benefits – Supplement in order to guarantee receipt of the statutory minimum invalidity benefit – Stricter conditions relating to the contribution period for workers who have exercised their right to freedom of movement.#Case C-633/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0743_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 December 2025.#A v GKV-Spitzenverband.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons – Migrant workers – Social security – Applicable legislation – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 11 – Article 13(1) – Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 – Article 14(8) – Worker pursuing an activity as an employed person in the territory of several States, including a Member State, the Swiss Confederation and third countries – Concept of ‘substantial part of the activity’ – Taking account of the activity pursued in third countries.#Case C-743/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0743decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 December 2025.#A v GKV-Spitzenverband.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landessozialgericht für das Saarland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons – Migrant workers – Social security – Applicable legislation – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 11 – Article 13(1) – Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 – Article 14(8) – Worker pursuing an activity as an employed person in the territory of several States, including a Member State, the Swiss Confederation and third countries – Concept of ‘substantial part of the activity’ – Taking account of the activity pursued in third countries.#Case C-743/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0525_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#OS v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Immigration policy – Directive (EU) 2016/801 – Conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purpose of voluntary service – Refusal to renew a residence permit – Article 7(1)(e) – Sufficient resources – Supplementary conditions arising from the case-law of a national supreme court – Evidence – Principle of the primacy of EU law.#Case C-525/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0525decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#OS v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Immigration policy – Directive (EU) 2016/801 – Conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purpose of voluntary service – Refusal to renew a residence permit – Article 7(1)(e) – Sufficient resources – Supplementary conditions arising from the case-law of a national supreme court – Evidence – Principle of the primacy of EU law.#Case C-525/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0203_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#KN v Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – Legislation applicable – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 13(1) – Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 – Article 14(8) and (10) – Worker normally employed in several Member States – Pursuit of less than 25% of the activity in the Member State of residence – Concept of ‘substantial part of the activity’ – Connecting factors relating to working time and/or remuneration – Consideration of other circumstances – Length of the assessment period – Discretion of the competent institutions.#Case C-203/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 September 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0203decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#KN v Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – Legislation applicable – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 13(1) – Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 – Article 14(8) and (10) – Worker normally employed in several Member States – Pursuit of less than 25% of the activity in the Member State of residence – Concept of ‘substantial part of the activity’ – Connecting factors relating to working time and/or remuneration – Consideration of other circumstances – Length of the assessment period – Discretion of the competent institutions.#Case C-203/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 September 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0257_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#PE, légalement représentée par ses parents v Städteregion Aachen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 3 – Matters covered – Freedom of movement for workers – Article 45 TFEU – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7 – Equal treatment – Social advantages – Disabled minor child of a frontier worker – Integration assistance in the form of school assistance benefits for disabled children – Residence requirement – Proportionality.#Case C-257/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0257decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#PE, légalement représentée par ses parents v Städteregion Aachen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 3 – Matters covered – Freedom of movement for workers – Article 45 TFEU – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7 – Equal treatment – Social advantages – Disabled minor child of a frontier worker – Integration assistance in the form of school assistance benefits for disabled children – Residence requirement – Proportionality.#Case C-257/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0299_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone de Belgique and Others v État belge, représenté par la Secrétaire d’État à l’Asile et la Migration.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Immigration policy – Directive (EU) 2016/801 – Conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for study purposes – Article 34(5) – Appeal against a decision rejecting an application for admission to the territory of a Member State for study purposes – Fundamental right to an effective judicial remedy – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-299/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 June 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0299decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone de Belgique and Others v État belge, représenté par la Secrétaire d’État à l’Asile et la Migration.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Immigration policy – Directive (EU) 2016/801 – Conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for study purposes – Article 34(5) – Appeal against a decision rejecting an application for admission to the territory of a Member State for study purposes – Fundamental right to an effective judicial remedy – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-299/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 June 2025

Page 1 of 2Next