Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects

Police

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

38 records in 2004

Records

Question· Schriftliche Frage16/11955open

Politically motivated crimes against the police in 2008 and development of the number of cases of resistance against law enforcement officers from 1998 to 2008

Germany · German Bundestag · 1 January 2005

<span>Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> </span><span>To the knowledge of the federal government, how many politically motivated crimes with the “police target” were there in the individual phenomena areas in 2008?<br /> <br /> What development did the number of cases of resistance against law enforcement officers develop from 1998 to 2008, and how does the federal government assess this development?</span>

Question· Schriftliche Frage16/11955open

Assessment of the personnel situation of the police in the federal and state governments to ward off terrorist threats

Germany · German Bundestag · 1 January 2005

<span>Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> </span><span>How does the federal government assess the personnel situation of the police at federal and state level with regard to the effective defense against terrorist threats, especially in light of the fact that the chairman of the police union, Konrad Freiberg, told the press that due to a lack of personnel, the police “are no longer even able to carry out the so-called “Dangerous person – a group of 60 to 100 people – to be monitored around the clock”?</span>

Question· Mündliche Frage16/12641open

Assessment of the deployment of the French police during the demonstrations in Strasbourg on April 4, 2009 on the occasion of the NATO summit as an interference with the basic rights of the demonstrators and consequences of the federal government

Germany · German Bundestag · 1 January 2005

<span>Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> What conclusions does the Federal Government draw from the fact that the French police bombarded thousands of peaceful demonstrators with tear gas and fired sound grenades at them during the demonstrations on April 4, 2009 in Strasbourg? <br /> <br /> <br /> </span><span>Does the federal government share my view that police measures, such as the type of border controls, the exit and entry bans, the shelling of demonstrators with tear gas and sound grenades, the blockade of the final rally and other repressive measures, represent serious interference with the basic democratic rights of NATO critics, and how does she justify her opinion?</span>

Question· Mündliche Frage16/12641open

Prevention of a registered demonstration on April 4, 2009 over the Europa Bridge in Kehl by the German police as well as different treatment of members of the Bundestag from the DIE LINKE faction. and the B90/Green faction passing German police posts

Germany · German Bundestag · 1 January 2005

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> How does the federal government assess the closure of the European Bridge on the German side (Kehl) by state and federal police on April 4, 2009, which prevented a registered demonstration across the bridge and also prevented several members of the German Bundestag from the DIE LINKE parliamentary group. (namely Sevim Dagdelen, Heike Hänsel) only after repeated protests and a half-hour wait, to pass the bridge to the middle, while the passage for other members of the German Bundestag (namely Hans-Christian Ströbele, Sylvia Kotting-Uhl) was organized more quickly by the police at the same point?<br /> <br /> How does the federal government assess the behavior of the state and federal police on April 4, 2009, towards several members of the German Bundestag from the DIE LINKE parliamentary group? (namely Sevim Dagdelen, Inge Höger, Ulla Jelpke, Wolfgang Gehrcke, Heike Hänsel) and a member of the European Parliament from the GUE/NGL (group of European United Left/Nordic Green Left) group (namely Tobias Pflüger) in the middle of the Europe Bridge, despite negotiating efforts and a promise to release the Europe Bridge for the registered demonstration, they have not kept this promise and the decision-making processes have not been made transparent have and the above To have stopped members of the German Bundestag several times on their way back to the German side (Kehl) and checked them unnecessarily?

Question· Mündliche Frage16/12641open

Responsible body for the closure of the European Bridge from Kehl to Strasbourg on April 4, 2009 for demonstrators of the Easter March; Participation of the German police in the operation against demonstrators in Strasbourg

Germany · German Bundestag · 1 January 2005

<span>Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> </span><span>Who is responsible for the fact that on April 4, 2009 the European Bridge from Kehl to Strasbourg remained closed for thousands of demonstrators of the Easter March from Kehl?<br /> <br /> In what form did German police take part in the crackdown on demonstrators in Strasbourg, and what means did they use?</span>

Resolution· Unselbständiger Entschließungsantrag218/UEAunselbständiger entschließungsantrag

Abstandnahme von der Zusammenlegung der Polizei- und Gendarmeriestrukturen in Steyr, Wels, Leoben, Eisenstadt, Wr. Neustadt und St. Pölten

Austria · National Council · 9 December 2004

Unselbständiger Entschließungsantrag der Abgeordneten Anton Heinzl, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend Abstandnahme von der Zusammenlegung der Polizei- und Gendarmeriestrukturen in Steyr, Wels, Leoben, Eisenstadt und Wr. Neustadt