Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Rule of law

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU in 2022

All countriesUnited States · 6,472Austria · 2,101France · 2,068Netherlands · 1,535Ireland · 1,467European Union · 660Germany · 244United Kingdom · 176Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0204_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.##Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of a ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria relating to the constitution and function of that body – Exercise of judicial or administrative functions – Duty of cooperation of the body making the reference – Directives 89/665/EEC and 2014/24/EU – Public procurement – National supervisory body for public procurement procedures – Entitlement to act on an ex officio basis – Power to impose penalties – Decisions that are open to challenge before the courts – No dispute before the referring body – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-204/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 December 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62020CC0671decided

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 15 December 2022.#Criminal proceedings against YP and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#References for a preliminary ruling – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rule of law – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law – Independence of judges – Primacy of EU law – Article 4(3) TEU – Duty of sincere cooperation – Lifting of a judge’s immunity from prosecution and his or her suspension from duties ordered by the Izba Dyscyplinarna (Disciplinary Chamber) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Lack of independence and impartiality on the part of that chamber – Alteration of the composition of the court formation called on to adjudicate on a case which up to that time had been entrusted to that judge – Prohibitions on national courts calling into question the legitimacy of a court, on undermining its functioning or on assessing the legality or effectiveness of the appointment of judges or of their judicial powers, subject to disciplinary penalties – Obligation on the courts concerned and the bodies which have power to designate and modify the composition of court formations to disapply the measures lifting immunity and suspending the judge concerned – Obligation on the same courts and bodies to disapply the national provisions providing for those prohibitions.#Joined Cases C-615/20 and C-671/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 December 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0204decided

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 15 December 2022.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union ‐ Rule of law – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by EU law – Independence of judges – Article 267 TFEU – Possibility of making a reference to the Court for a preliminary ruling – Primacy of EU law – Jurisdiction in relation to the lifting of the immunity from criminal prosecution of judges and in the field of employment law, social security and retirement of judges of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) conferred on the Disciplinary Chamber of that court – National courts prohibited from calling into question the legitimacy of the constitutional courts and bodies or from establishing or assessing the lawfulness of the appointment of judges or their judicial powers – Verification by a judge of compliance with certain requirements relating to the existence of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law classified as a ‘disciplinary offence’ – Exclusive jurisdiction to examine questions relating to the lack of independence of a court or judge conferred on the Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs Chamber of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court) – Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Rights to privacy and the protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 6(1), first subparagraph, points (c) and (e), and Article 6(3), second subparagraph – Article 9(1) – Sensitive data – National legislation requiring judges to make a declaration as to whether they belong to associations, foundations or political parties, and to the positions held within those associations, foundations or political parties, and providing for the placing online of the data contained in those declarations.#Case C-204/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 December 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0401_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 November 2022.#KN v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Member of the EESC – Discharge procedure in respect of the implementation of the budget of the EESC for the financial year 2019 – Parliament resolution designating the applicant as the perpetrator of psychological harassment – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Action for damages – Protection of personal data – Presumption of innocence – Obligation of confidentiality – Principle of good administration – Proportionality – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-401/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 November 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0401decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 November 2022.#KN v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Member of the EESC – Discharge procedure in respect of the implementation of the budget of the EESC for the financial year 2019 – Parliament resolution designating the applicant as the perpetrator of psychological harassment – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Action for damages – Protection of personal data – Presumption of innocence – Obligation of confidentiality – Principle of good administration – Proportionality – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-401/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 November 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62016TO0379(02)_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 November 2022.#Basicmed Enterprises Ltd and Others v Council of the European Union and Others.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Stability support programme for Cyprus – Decision of the Governing Council of the ECB on the provision of emergency liquidity following a request by the Central Bank of Cyprus – Eurogroup statements of 25 March, 12 April, 13 May and 13 September 2013 concerning Cyprus – Decision 2013/236/EU – Implementing Decision 2013/463/EU – Memorandum of Understanding of 26 April 2013 on specific economic policy conditions between Cyprus and the European Stability Mechanism – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Admissibility – Formal requirements – Exhaustion of domestic remedies – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Right to property – Legitimate expectations – Equal treatment – Action brought in part before a court which manifestly lacks jurisdiction to hear and determine the case, in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-379/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 November 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62016TO0379(02)decided

Order of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 November 2022.#Basicmed Enterprises Ltd and Others v Council of the European Union and Others.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Stability support programme for Cyprus – Decision of the Governing Council of the ECB on the provision of emergency liquidity following a request by the Central Bank of Cyprus – Eurogroup statements of 25 March, 12 April, 13 May and 13 September 2013 concerning Cyprus – Decision 2013/236/EU – Implementing Decision 2013/463/EU – Memorandum of Understanding of 26 April 2013 on specific economic policy conditions between Cyprus and the European Stability Mechanism – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Admissibility – Formal requirements – Exhaustion of domestic remedies – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Right to property – Legitimate expectations – Equal treatment – Action brought in part before a court which manifestly lacks jurisdiction to hear and determine the case, in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-379/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 November 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0275_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 November 2022.#Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment and for damages – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European market for prestressing steel – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Suspension of the obligation to provide a bank guarantee – Payment by instalments on a provisional basis – Judgment annulling in part the decision and setting a fine in an amount identical to the amount of the fine originally imposed – Application of payments made on a provisional basis – Default interest – First paragraph of Article 266 TFEU – Unjust enrichment – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Recovery of undue payments – No legal basis – Unlawfulness.#Case T-275/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 November 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0275decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 November 2022.#Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment and for damages – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European market for prestressing steel – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Suspension of the obligation to provide a bank guarantee – Payment by instalments on a provisional basis – Judgment annulling in part the decision and setting a fine in an amount identical to the amount of the fine originally imposed – Application of payments made on a provisional basis – Default interest – First paragraph of Article 266 TFEU – Unjust enrichment – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Recovery of undue payments – No legal basis – Unlawfulness.#Case T-275/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 November 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0104_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 October 2022.#RegioJet a. s. v České dráhy a.s.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria relating to the constitution and function of that body – Exercise of judicial or administrative functions – Directive 2012/34/EU – Articles 55 and 56 – Single national regulatory body for the railway sector – Independent regulatory authority for the sector – Entitlement to act on an ex officio basis – Power to impose penalties – Decisions that are open to challenge before the courts – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-104/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 October 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0104decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 October 2022.#RegioJet a. s. v České dráhy a.s.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Úřad pro přístup k dopravní infrastruktuře.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria relating to the constitution and function of that body – Exercise of judicial or administrative functions – Directive 2012/34/EU – Articles 55 and 56 – Single national regulatory body for the railway sector – Independent regulatory authority for the sector – Entitlement to act on an ex officio basis – Power to impose penalties – Decisions that are open to challenge before the courts – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-104/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 October 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0081decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 October 2022.#"Sistem ecologica" production, trade and services d.o.o. Srbac v European Commission.#Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 – Investigation into evasion of the conventional, countervailing and anti-dumping duties imposed on imports of biodiesel into the European Union – OLAF Communication to national customs authorities – OLAF investigation report – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Claim for compensation – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-81/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 October 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0081_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 October 2022.#"Sistem ecologica" production, trade and services d.o.o. Srbac v European Commission.#Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 – Investigation into evasion of the conventional, countervailing and anti-dumping duties imposed on imports of biodiesel into the Union – OLAF Communication to national customs authorities – OLAF investigation report – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Claim for compensation – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-81/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 October 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0619_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 September 2022.#International Management Group (IMG) v European Commission.#Appeal – Development cooperation – Implementation of the EU budget under indirect management by an international organisation – Decision to not entrust any new budget implementation tasks to an entity due to doubts as to its status as an international organisation – Action for annulment – Compliance with a judgment annulling a measure – Res judicata – Obligations and powers of the author of the annulled act – Preparatory act – Admissibility – Claim for damages – Rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – EU financial regulations – Duty of diligence – Existence of a sufficiently serious infringement of that obligation – Specific examination on a case-by-case basis – Non-material harm – Appropriate and sufficient compensation by the annulment of the unlawful act – Material harm – Dispute not in a condition to be adjudicated upon – Referral back to the General Court).#Joined Cases C-619/20 P and C-620/20 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 September 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0619decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 September 2022.#International Management Group (IMG) v European Commission.#Appeal – Development cooperation – Implementation of the EU budget under indirect management by an international organisation – Decision to not entrust any new budget implementation tasks to an entity due to doubts as to its status as an international organisation – Action for annulment – Compliance with a judgment annulling a measure – Res judicata – Obligations and powers of the author of the annulled act – Preparatory act – Admissibility – Claim for damages – Rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – EU financial regulations – Duty of diligence – Existence of a sufficiently serious infringement of that obligation – Specific examination on a case-by-case basis – Non-material harm – Appropriate and sufficient compensation by the annulment of the unlawful act – Material harm – Dispute not in a condition to be adjudicated upon – Referral back to the General Court).#Joined Cases C-619/20 P and C-620/20 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 September 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62021TO0254decided

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 July 2022.#Armadora Parleros, SL v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Common fisheries policy – Failure by the Commission to exercise its powers of control covered by the applicable legislation – Engine power of boats – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Damage – Causal link – Limitation period – Action manifestly inadmissible.#Case T-254/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 July 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62021TO0254_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 July 2022.#Armadora Parleros, SL v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Common fisheries policy – Failure by the Commission to exercise its powers of control covered by the applicable legislation – Engine power of boats – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Damage – Causal link – Limitation period – Action manifestly inadmissible.#Case T-254/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 July 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62018TO0200_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 July 2022.#Fersher Developments LTD and Vladimir Lisin v European Commission and European Central Bank.#Action for damages – Economic and monetary policy – Stability support programme for Cyprus – Memorandum of Understanding of 26 April 2013 on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality concluded between Cyprus and the European Stability Mechanism – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Equal treatment – Principle of proportionality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-200/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 July 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62018TO0200decided

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 July 2022.#Fersher Developments LTD and Vladimir Lisin v European Commission and European Central Bank.#Action for damages – Economic and monetary policy – Stability support programme for Cyprus – Memorandum of Understanding of 26 April 2013 on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality concluded between Cyprus and the European Stability Mechanism – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Equal treatment – Principle of proportionality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-200/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 July 2022

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0710_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 July 2022.#Criminal proceedings against AM.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Field of application – Article 51 – Legislative procedure for the adoption of a resolution relating to the revocation of an amnesty – Judicial procedure for review of the compliance of that resolution with the national Constitution – Failure to implement EU law – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-710/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 July 2022

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0710decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 July 2022.#Criminal proceedings against AM.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava II.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Field of application – Article 51 – Legislative procedure for the adoption of a resolution relating to the revocation of an amnesty – Judicial procedure for review of the compliance of that resolution with the national Constitution – Failure to implement EU law – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-710/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 July 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0278_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 28 June 2022.#European Commission v Kingdom of Spain.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Liability of Member States for harm caused to individuals by infringements of EU law – Infringement of EU law attributable to the national legislature – Infringement of the Constitution of a Member State attributable to the national legislature – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness.#Case C-278/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 June 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0278decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 28 June 2022.#European Commission v Kingdom of Spain.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Liability of Member States for harm caused to individuals by infringements of EU law – Infringement of EU law attributable to the national legislature – Infringement of the Constitution of a Member State attributable to the national legislature – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness.#Case C-278/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 June 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0384decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 May 2022.#OC v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – OLAF investigation – Press release – Processing of personal data – Presumption of innocence – Confidentiality of OLAF investigations – Right to sound administration – Proportionality – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Case T-384/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 May 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0384_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 May 2022.#OC v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – OLAF investigation – Press release – Processing of personal data – Presumption of innocence – Confidentiality of OLAF investigations – Right to sound administration – Proportionality – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Case T-384/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 May 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0453_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 May 2022.#CityRail a.s. v Správa železnic, státní organizace.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFUE – Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria relating to the body’s constitution and function – Exercise of judicial or administrative functions – Directive 2012/34/EU – Articles 55 and 56 – Single national regulatory body for the railway sector – Independent regulatory authority for the sector – Entitlement to act on an ex-officio basis – Power to impose penalties – Decisions that are open to challenge before the courts – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-453/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 May 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0453decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 May 2022.#CityRail a.s. v Správa železnic, státní organizace.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Úřad pro přístup k dopravní infrastruktuře.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFUE – Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria relating to the body’s constitution and function – Exercise of judicial or administrative functions – Directive 2012/34/EU – Articles 55 and 56 – Single national regulatory body for the railway sector – Independent regulatory authority for the sector – Entitlement to act on an ex-officio basis – Power to impose penalties – Decisions that are open to challenge before the courts – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-453/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 May 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0277_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Secrétariat général de l’Enseignement catholique ASBL (SeGEC) and Others v Institut des Comptes nationaux (ICN) and Banque nationale de Belgique.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 – European system of national and regional accounts in the European Union – Annex A, paragraph 20.15 – Control exercised by an institute of national accounts over the organising authorities of educational establishments constituted in the form of non-profit institutions – Educational establishments receiving public financing and enjoying freedom of education guaranteed by the Constitution – Annex A, paragraph 20.15, second sentence – Concept of ‘public intervention in the form of general regulations applicable to all units working in the same activity’ – Scope – Annex A, paragraph 20.15, first sentence – Annex A, paragraph 2.39(b), paragraph 20.15(b), and paragraph 20.309(h) – Concept of ‘excessive regulation’ – Scope.#Case C-277/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 April 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0277decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Secrétariat général de l’Enseignement catholique ASBL (SeGEC) and Others v Institut des Comptes nationaux (ICN) and Banque nationale de Belgique.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 – European system of national and regional accounts in the European Union – Annex A, paragraph 20.15 – Control exercised by an institute of national accounts over the organising authorities of educational establishments constituted in the form of non-profit institutions – Educational establishments receiving public financing and enjoying freedom of education guaranteed by the Constitution – Annex A, paragraph 20.15, second sentence – Concept of ‘public intervention in the form of general regulations applicable to all units working in the same activity’ – Scope – Annex A, paragraph 20.15, first sentence – Annex A, paragraph 2.39(b), paragraph 20.15(b), and paragraph 20.309(h) – Concept of ‘excessive regulation’ – Scope.#Case C-277/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0750decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Paula Correia v European Economic and Social Committee.#Civil service – EESC staff – Members of the temporary staff – Request for career reconstitution – Rejection of the request – Action for annulment – Proper conduct of the pre-litigation procedure – Time limit for lodging a complaint – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Equal treatment – Legal certainty – Entitlement to reasonable career prospects – Absence of a right to career constitution – Obligation to carry out a consideration of the comparative merits – Liability – Non-material damage.#Case T-750/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0068_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#QA v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Grant agreement concluded in the context of the Seventh framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013) – Audit report – Language – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Proportionality – Principle of good administration.#Case T-68/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0750_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Paula Correia v European Economic and Social Committee.#Civil service – EESC staff – Members of the temporary staff – Request for career reconstitution – Rejection of the request – Action for annulment – Proper conduct of the pre-litigation procedure – Time limit for lodging a complaint – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Equal treatment – Legal certainty – Entitlement to reasonable career prospects – Absence of a right to career constitution – Obligation to carry out a consideration of the comparative merits – Liability – Non-material damage.#Case T-750/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0068decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#QA v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Grant agreement concluded in the context of the Seventh framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013) – Audit report – Language – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Proportionality – Principle of good administration.#Case T-68/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0735decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Planistat Europe and Hervé-Patrick Charlot v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – ‘Eurostat’ case – External investigation by OLAF – Forwarding to the national judicial authorities of information concerning matters liable to result in criminal proceedings before the conclusion of the investigation – Filing of a complaint by the Commission before the conclusion of the investigation – National criminal proceedings – Ruling that there is no need to adjudicate which has become final – No sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Case T-735/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0735_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Planistat Europe and Hervé-Patrick Charlot v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – ‘Eurostat’ case – External investigation by OLAF – Forwarding to the national judicial authorities of information concerning matters liable to result in criminal proceedings before the conclusion of the investigation – Filing of a complaint by the Commission before the conclusion of the investigation – National criminal proceedings – Ruling that there is no need to adjudicate which has become final – No sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Case T-735/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 April 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0132_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 March 2022.#BN and Others v Getin Noble Bank S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of court – Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection – Principle of judicial independence – Tribunal previously established by law – Judicial body, a member of which was appointed for the first time to the position of judge by a political body within the executive branch of an undemocratic regime – Way in which the Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (National Council of the Judiciary, Poland) operates – Unconstitutionality of the law on the basis of which that council was composed – Possibility of regarding that body as an impartial and independent court or tribunal within the meaning of EU law.#Case C-132/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 March 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0132decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 March 2022.#BN and Others v Getin Noble Bank S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of court – Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection – Principle of judicial independence – Tribunal previously established by law – Judicial body, a member of which was appointed for the first time to the position of judge by a political body within the executive branch of an undemocratic regime – Way in which the Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (National Council of the Judiciary, Poland) operates – Unconstitutionality of the law on the basis of which that council was composed – Possibility of regarding that body as an impartial and independent court or tribunal within the meaning of EU law.#Case C-132/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 March 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0283_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#CO and Others v MJ and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) – European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (Eulex Kosovo) – Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP – Article 8(3) and (5), Article 9(3) and Article 10(3) – Status of employer of the mission staff – Article 16(5) – Subrogation.#Case C-283/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 February 2022

Page 1 of 2Next