Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Transport

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

251 records in EU

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0020_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#M1.R. and M2.R. v AAA sp. z o.o.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 2(g) – Article 3(2) and (3) – Right to compensation in the event of a long delay to a flight – Scope – Passengers having a boarding pass – Proof of a reservation confirmed by the air carrier – Passengers travelling free of charge or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public – Flight part of a package tour financed by a third party – Burden of proving payment.#Case C-20/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0020decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#M1.R. and M2.R. v AAA sp. z o.o.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 2(g) – Article 3(2) and (3) – Right to compensation in the event of a long delay to a flight – Scope – Passengers having a boarding pass – Proof of a reservation confirmed by the air carrier – Passengers travelling free of charge or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public – Flight part of a package tour financed by a third party – Burden of proving payment.#Case C-20/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2025

Proposal· PCCELEX 52025PC0057open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Group of Experts on the European Agreement concerning the work of crews of vehicles engaged in international road transport (AETR) and in the Working Party on Road Transport of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe as regards a proposal to align the AETR with the main recent amendments to Regulation (EC) No 561/2006

European Union · European Commission · 28 February 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0220_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#Regia Autonomă Aeroportul Internaţional „Avram Iancu” Cluj v Consiliul Concurenţei.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Directive 96/67/EC – Access to the groundhandling market at EU airports – Article 1 – Scope – Airports whose annual traffic is less than two million passenger movements – Refusal of access to airport infrastructure at such an airport – Article 6 – Groundhandling for third parties – Applicability of the competition rules – Article 102 TFEU.#Case C-220/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 February 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0220decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#Regia Autonomă Aeroportul Internaţional 'Avram Iancu' Cluj v Consiliul Concurenţei.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Directive 96/67/EC – Access to the groundhandling market at EU airports – Article 1 – Scope – Airports whose annual traffic is less than two million passenger movements – Refusal of access to airport infrastructure at such an airport – Article 6 – Groundhandling for third parties – Applicability of the competition rules – Article 102 TFEU.#Case C-220/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 February 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0684_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 February 2025.#SIA ,,Latvijas Sabiedriskais Autobuss” v Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs and VSIA „Autotransporta direkcija”.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Public passenger transport services by bus – Point (c) of the third subparagraph of Article 5(2) – Award of public service contracts – Award of a contract for the provision of public transport services by bus – Award in the form of a service concession contract – Direct award by a competent local authority to an internal operator – Article 5(3) – Competitive tendering procedure – Award of a contract for the provision of public transport services by bus by another competent authority – Participation of the internal operator – Conditions.#Case C-684/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 February 2025

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0615decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 13 February 2025.#Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej v P. S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 73 – Taxable amount – Consideration – Subsidies directly linked to the price of a taxable transaction – Collective public transport services – Compensation paid by a local authority to the service provider to cover the costs incurred – Direct link between the compensation and the services provided.#Case C-615/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 February 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0684decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 February 2025.#'Latvijas Sabiedriskais Autobuss' SIA v Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs and 'Autotransporta direkcija' VSIA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the administratīvā rajona tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Public passenger transport services by bus – Point (c) of the third subparagraph of Article 5(2) – Award of public service contracts – Award of a contract for the provision of public transport services by bus – Award in the form of a service concession contract – Direct award by a competent local authority to an internal operator – Article 5(3) – Competitive tendering procedure – Award of a contract for the provision of public transport services by bus by another competent authority – Participation of the internal operator – Conditions.#Case C-684/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 February 2025

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0499decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 6 February 2025.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Free movement of goods – Article 35 TFEU – Quantitative restrictions on exports – Measures having equivalent effect – Construction materials – Obligation to notify exports – State’s right of pre-emption – Article 36 TFEU – Justification – Public security – Supply of construction materials for critical infrastructure – Control of exports to third countries – Exclusive competence of the Union – Common commercial policy – Regulation (EU) 2015/479 – Common rules for exports – Directive (EU) 2015/1535 – Information procedure in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services.#Case C-499/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 February 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0743decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 February 2025.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Portuguese air transport market – Rescue aid granted by Portugal to TAP SGPS – State loan – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Eligibility – Point 22 of the Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring undertakings in difficulty – Company belonging to a group – Intrinsic difficulties not resulting from an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group – Difficulties which are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself – Appropriateness of the aid – Proportionality – Weighing up of the positive and negative effects – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-743/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 February 2025

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0783decided

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 30 January 2025.#Liège Airport Security v État belge, représenté par le Ministre de l’Intérieur.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 – Civil aviation security – Article 4 – Common basic standards – Article 9 – Appropriate authority – Member State’s obligation to designate a single authority to be responsible for the coordination and monitoring of the implementation of safety standards – Scope – National authority responsible for ensuring compliance with national regulations governing the exercise of private safety activities.#Case C-783/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 January 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0642decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 January 2025.#Flightright GmbH v Etihad Airways P.J.S.C.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 8(1)(a) – Right to reimbursement of the cost of the airline ticket in the event of cancellation of a flight – Choice between reimbursement in money or in travel vouchers – Article 7(3) – Concept of the ‘signed agreement of the passenger’ – Loyalty account set up by the passenger on the air carrier’s website.#Case C-642/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 January 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0642_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 January 2025.#Flightright GmbH v Etihad Airways P.J.S.C.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 8(1)(a) – Right to reimbursement of the cost of the airline ticket in the event of cancellation of a flight – Choice between reimbursement in money or in travel vouchers – Article 7(3) – Concept of the ‘signed agreement of the passenger’ – Loyalty account set up by the passenger on the air carrier’s website.#Case C-642/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 January 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0516_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 January 2025.#NW and YS v Qatar Airways.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 3(3) – Travel free of charge or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public – Passenger who has paid only charges and air transport taxes – Reservation in the context of a promotional campaign – Article 8(1)(c) – Right to re-routing at a later date – No requirement of a temporal link between the cancelled flight and the re-routing flight desired by the passenger.#Case C-516/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 January 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0516decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 January 2025.#NW and YS v Qatar Airways.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 3(3) – Travel free of charge or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public – Passenger who has paid only charges and air transport taxes – Reservation in the context of a promotional campaign – Article 8(1)(c) – Right to re-routing at a later date – No requirement of a temporal link between the cancelled flight and the re-routing flight desired by the passenger.#Case C-516/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 January 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0596_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#Proceedings brought by B UG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 36(1) – Online purchase of excise goods in another Member State – Transport by a transporter recommended by the vendor – National rules regarding the vendor as liable for the excise duties chargeable in the Member State of destination.#Case C-596/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0596decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#Proceedings brought by B UG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hallinto-oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 36(1) – Online purchase of excise goods in another Member State – Transport by a transporter recommended by the vendor – National rules regarding the vendor as liable for the excise duties chargeable in the Member State of destination.#Case C-596/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0427_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 28 November 2024.#SJ AB v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Directive 2014/25/EU – Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors – Request to establish that Directive 2014/25 does not apply to public procurement in the field of railway passenger transport in Sweden – Article 35(1) of Directive 2014/25 – Letter from the Commission requesting additional information – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-427/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 November 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0427decided

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 28 November 2024.#SJ AB v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Directive 2014/25/EU – Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors – Request to establish that Directive 2014/25 does not apply to public procurement in the field of railway passenger transport in Sweden – Article 35(1) of Directive 2014/25 – Letter from the Commission requesting additional information – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-427/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 November 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0129_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 November 2024.#BG Technik cs, a.s. v Generální ředitelství cel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Classification of goods – Tariff heading 8703 – Motor cars and other motor vehicles principally designed for the transport of persons – Tariff heading 8713 – Carriages for disabled persons – Regulation (EC) No 718/2009 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1367 – SELVO 4800 vehicle – Concept of ‘disabled persons’.#Joined Cases C-129/23 and C-567/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 November 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0129decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 November 2024.#BG Technik cs a.s. v Generální ředitelství cel.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud and Krajský soud v Ostravě.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Classification of goods – Tariff heading 8703 – Motor cars and other motor vehicles principally designed for the transport of persons – Tariff heading 8713 – Carriages for disabled persons – Regulation (EC) No 718/2009 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1367 – SELVO 4800 vehicle – Concept of ‘disabled persons’.#Joined Cases C-129/23 and C-567/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 November 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0061_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 November 2024.#„Еkоstroy“ EOOD v Agentsia „Patna infrastruktura“.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Road transport – Tax provisions – Directive 1999/62/EC – Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures – Penalties applicable to infringements of the national provisions adopted under that directive – Article 9a – Requirement of proportionality – National legislation penalising all offences by means of a flat-rate fine.#Case C-61/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 November 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0061decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 November 2024.#'Еkоstroy' EOOD v Agentsia 'Patna infrastruktura'.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad – Haskovo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Road transport – Tax provisions – Directive 1999/62/EC – Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures – Penalties applicable to infringements of the national provisions adopted under that directive – Article 9a – Requirement of proportionality – National legislation penalising all offences by means of a flat-rate fine.#Case C-61/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0692_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Iliad Italia SpA v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Italian market for mobile telecommunication services – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market – Grouping of passive infrastructure into a joint venture – Commitments entered into during the first phase of examination – Granting of access to the joint venture’s sites – Manifest error of assessment – General terms of the commitments – Protection against a risk of bias when selecting sites – Implementation of commitments.#Case T-692/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0692decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Iliad Italia SpA v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Italian market for mobile telecommunication services – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market – Grouping of passive infrastructure into a joint venture – Commitments entered into during the first phase of examination – Granting of access to the joint venture’s sites – Manifest error of assessment – General terms of the commitments – Protection against a risk of bias when selecting sites – Implementation of commitments.#Case T-692/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0538decided

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 7 November 2024.#ÖBB-Infrastruktur AG and WESTbahn Management GmbH v Schienen-Control Kommission.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure – Establishing, determining and collecting charges – Article 29 – Exceptions to charging principles – Article 32 – Mark-ups – Modalities for calculation and publication – Article 56 – Functions of the regulatory body – Authorisation procedure for mark-ups, provided for by national law – Conditions.#Case C-538/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 November 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0588decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 November 2024.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(3)(b) TFEU – Finnish air-transport market – Aid granted to an airline by the Republic of Finland in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Recapitalisation of Finnair plc – Decision by the European Commission not to raise any objections – Aid to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy – Principles of proportionality and of non-discrimination.#Case C-588/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0827decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission.#State aid – Romanian air transport market – Aid granted by Romania to TAROM in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Capital injection – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Substantial adverse effect on the applicant’s position on the market in question – Admissibility – Aid to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Assessment of the damage – Causal link – Beneficiary’s pre-existing financial difficulties – Principle of non-discrimination – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-827/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0827_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission.#State aid – Romanian air transport market – Aid granted by Romania to TAROM in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Capital injection – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Substantial adverse effect on the applicant’s position on the market in question – Admissibility – Aid to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Assessment of the damage – Causal link – Beneficiary’s pre-existing financial difficulties – Principle of non-discrimination – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-827/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 November 2024

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-10-2024-002408answered

Transport fluvial

European Union · European Parliament · 5 November 2024

Decision· DCELEX 32025D2417in force

Council Decision (EU) 2025/2417 of 27 October 2025 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Specialised Committee on Road Transport established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, on the national electronic registers of road transport undertakings and the modalities of the exchange of information contained in those registers

European Union · EUR-Lex · 27 October 2024

PreviousPage 5 of 6Next