Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Asylum

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

151 records in EU

All countriesUnited Kingdom · 12,687Ireland · 6,788Austria · 3,733Netherlands · 2,241United States · 2,034Germany · 1,645European Union · 1,412France · 895Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0283_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 April 2025.#B. F. v Kypriaki Dimokratia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – International protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 46(3) – Requirement for a full and ex nunc examination – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Scope of the powers of the court or tribunal of first instance – National legislation that makes no provision for a power to order a medical examination of the applicant for international protection.#Case C-283/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 April 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0283decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 April 2025.#B. F. v Kypriaki Dimokratia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – International protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 46(3) – Requirement for a full and ex nunc examination – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Scope of the powers of the court or tribunal of first instance – National legislation that makes no provision for a power to order a medical examination of the applicant for international protection.#Case C-283/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 April 2025

Proposal· PCCELEX 52025PC0152open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the extension of the term for accession of Tunisia to the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence, with regard to matters related to judicial cooperation in criminal matters, asylum and non-refoulement

European Union · European Commission · 31 March 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0217_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 March 2025.#Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl v A N.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Conditions that must be fulfilled by third-country nationals in order to be eligible for refugee status – Article 2(d) – Reasons for persecution – Article 10(1)(d) – Concept of ‘membership of a particular social group’ – Condition relating to the perception of the group as being different by the surrounding society in the country of origin – Qualification for subsidiary protection – Article 2(f) – Concept of ‘serious harm’ – Article 15(a) and (b) – Persons who are part of the same family and are targeted by a blood feud because of their family relationship.#Case C-217/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 March 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0217decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 March 2025.#Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl v A N.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Conditions that must be fulfilled by third-country nationals in order to be eligible for refugee status – Article 2(d) – Reasons for persecution – Article 10(1)(d) – Concept of ‘membership of a particular social group’ – Condition relating to the perception of the group as being different by the surrounding society in the country of origin – Qualification for subsidiary protection – Article 2(f) – Concept of ‘serious harm’ – Article 15(a) and (b) – Persons who are part of the same family and are targeted by a blood feud because of their family relationship.#Case C-217/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 March 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0454_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#Κ.Α.Μ. v Republic of Cyprus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – International protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Refugee status – Article 14, paragraphs 4(a) and 5 – Revocation or refusal to grant refugee status in the event of danger to the security of the host Member State – Conduct and acts prior to the entry of the applicant into the territory of the host Member State – Admissibility – Validity – Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU – Article 78(1) TFEU. – Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (‘Geneva Convention’).#Case C-454/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 February 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0454decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#Κ.Α.Μ. v Republic of Cyprus.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Dioikitiko Dikastirio Diethnous Prostasias.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – International protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Refugee status – Article 14(4)(a) and (5) – Revocation or refusal to grant refugee status in the event of danger to the security of the host Member State – Conduct and acts prior to the entry of the applicant into the territory of the host Member State – Admissibility – Validity – Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 78(1) TFEU – Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (‘Geneva Convention’).#Case C-454/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 February 2025

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0610decided

Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 6 February 2025.#FO v Ypourgos Metanastefsis kai Asylou.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Dioikitiko Protodikeio Thessalonikis.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – International protection – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 46 – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy – Requirement of full and ex nunc examination of the appeal – Obligation to appear in person before the authority examining the appeal – Presumption that an appeal has been improperly brought – Dismissal of the appeal as manifestly unfounded without examination of the merits – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-610/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 February 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0158decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 February 2025.#T.G. v Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 34 – Access to integration facilities – Obligation to pass, on pain of a fine, a civic integration examination – Beneficiary of international protection who has not passed such an examination in time – Obligation to pay a fine – Obligation to bear the full costs of civic integration courses and examinations – Possibility of obtaining a loan in order to pay those costs.#Case C-158/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 February 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0158_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 February 2025.#T.G. v Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 34 – Access to integration facilities – Obligation to pass, on pain of a fine, a civic integration examination – Beneficiary of international protection who has not passed such an examination in time – Obligation to pay a fine – Obligation to bear the full costs of civic integration courses and examinations – Possibility of obtaining a loan in order to pay those costs.#Case C-158/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 February 2025

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0636decided

Opinion of Advocate General Spielmann delivered on 30 January 2025.#W and X v Belgische Staat and État belge, représenté par la Secrétaire d’État à l’Asile et la Migration.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad voor Vreemdelingenbetwistingen and Conseil du Contentieux des Étrangers.#References for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Immigration policy – Directive 2008/115/EC – Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 3(4) and (6), Article 7(1) and (4), Article 8(1) and (2), Article 11(1) and Article 13 – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Return decision – Decision not to grant a period for voluntary departure – Entry ban – Actionable administrative act – Enforceability of a return decision not containing a provision relating to the period for voluntary departure – Right to an effective remedy – Entry ban decision adopted after a considerable period of time.#Joined Cases C-636/23 and C-637/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 January 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0244_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#P and Others v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced person – Directive 2001/55/EC – Articles 4 and 7 – Invasion of Ukraine by Russian armed forces – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/382 – Article 2(3) – Option for a Member State to grant temporary protection to displaced persons who are not referred to in that decision – Point in time when a Member State that has granted such persons temporary protection may terminate that protection – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 6 – Return decision – Point in time when a Member State may issue a return decision – Illegal stay.#Joined Cases C-244/24 and C-290/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0244decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#P and Others v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons – Directive 2001/55/EC – Articles 4 and 7 – Invasion of Ukraine by Russian armed forces – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/382 – Article 2(3) – Option for a Member State to apply temporary protection to displaced persons not covered by that decision – Point in time when a Member State which has granted temporary protection to such persons may terminate that protection – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 6 – Return decision – Point in time when a Member State may adopt a return decision – Illegal stay.#Joined Cases C-244/24 and C-290/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0185decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#RL and QS v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 3(2) – Transfer of the asylum seeker to the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection – Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Risk of inhuman or degrading treatment – Evidence and standard of proof of the real risk of inhuman or degrading treatment, resulting from systemic flaws in the asylum procedure and in the reception conditions for applicants in the Member State responsible – Suspension, by the Member State responsible, of the taking charge of and taking back of asylum seekers.#Joined Cases C-185/24 and C-189/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0123decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#N. A. K. and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Minden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Application for international protection – Grounds for inadmissibility – Article 2(q) – Concept of ‘subsequent application’ – Article 33(2)(d) – Rejection of an application for international protection as inadmissible by a Member State due to the rejection of a previous application made in another Member State or the discontinuation of the procedure by another Member State in respect of the previous application.#Joined Cases C-123/23 and C-202/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0123_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#N. A. K. and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Application for international protection – Grounds for inadmissibility – Article 2(q) – Concept of ‘subsequent application’ – Article 33(2)(d) – Rejection by a Member State of an application for international protection as inadmissible due to the rejection of a previous application made in another Member State or the discontinuation of the procedure by another Member State in respect of the previous application.#Joined Cases C-123/23 and C-202/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0662decided

Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 12 December 2024.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v X.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 4(1) and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) – Procedures for granting international protection – Extension by the determining authority of the six-month examination period – Large number of applications for international protection lodged simultaneously – Concept – Consideration of other circumstances.#Case C-662/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0460decided

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 7 November 2024.#OB v Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Bologna.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bologna.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Directive 2002/90/EC – General offence of facilitation of unauthorised entry, transit and residence – Article 1(1)(a) – Interpretation consistent with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 7 – Respect for private and family life – Article 24 – Rights of the child – Article 52(1) – Interference with the essence of fundamental rights – Article 18 – Right to asylum – Person bringing into the territory of a Member State, in an unauthorised manner, minors who are third-country nationals accompanying him or her and over whom he or she exercises actual care.#Case C-460/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 November 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0062decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 October 2024.#ST v European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex).#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Area of freedom, security and justice – Right to asylum – Activities by Frontex in the Aegean Sea – Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 – Article 46 – Margin of discretion – Action for failure to act – Invitation to act submitted in the name and on behalf of an anonymous person – Decision refusing the invitation to act before the action for failure to act was brought – Manifest inadmissibility – Action for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Annulment not capable of securing a benefit for the applicant – Appeal, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.#Case C-62/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0387decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#C v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Roermond.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Border control, asylum and immigration – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 15(2)(b) – Detention of a third-country national for the purpose of removal – Directive 2013/33/EU – Article 9 – Detention of an applicant for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 28(2) – Detention for the purpose of transfer – Unlawful detention – Articles 6 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-387/24 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0406_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#CV v Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – International protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Articles 36 and 37 – Concept of ‘safe country of origin’ – Designation – Annex I – Criteria – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Examination by the court of the designation of a third country as a safe country of origin.#Case C-406/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0608decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#AH and FN v Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#References for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Conditions that must be fulfilled by third-country nationals in order to be granted refugee status – Article 2(d) and (e) – Concept of ‘act of persecution’ – Level of seriousness required – Article 9 – Sufficiently severe accumulation of measures that discriminate against women – Article 9(1)(b) – Types of acts of persecution – Article 9(2) – Assessment of applications for international protection – Article 4(3) – Obligation to carry out an individual assessment – Scope.#Joined Cases C-608/22 and C-609/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0406decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#CV v Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – International protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Articles 36 and 37 – Concept of ‘safe country of origin’ – Designation – Annex I – Criteria – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Examination by the court of the designation of a third country as a safe country of origin.#Case C-406/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0352_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 September 2024.#LF v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum and immigration policy – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Scope – Articles 1, 4 and 7 – Directive 2011/95/EU – Scope – Articles 2 and 3 – National protection on humanitarian grounds – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 14 – No possibility of carrying out the removal – Certification – Rights of an illegally staying third-country national in the event of postponement of removal – Directive 2013/33/EU – Scope – Material Reception Conditions.#Case C-352/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 September 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0352decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 September 2024.#LF v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum and immigration policy – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Scope – Articles 1, 4 and 7 – Directive 2011/95/EU – Scope – Articles 2 and 3 – National protection on humanitarian grounds – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 14 – No possibility of carrying out the removal – Certification – Rights of an illegally staying third-country national in the event of postponement of removal – Directive 2013/33/EU – Scope – Material Reception Conditions.#Case C-352/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 September 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0217decided

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 5 September 2024.#Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl v A N.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Conditions that must be fulfilled by third-country nationals in order to be eligible for refugee status – Article 2(d) – Reasons for persecution – Article 10(1)(d) – Concept of ‘membership of a particular social group’ – Condition relating to the perception of the group as being different by the surrounding society in the country of origin – Qualification for subsidiary protection – Article 2(f) – Concept of ‘serious harm’ – Article 15(a) and (b) – Persons who are part of the same family and are targeted by a blood feud because of their family relationship.#Case C-217/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 September 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62024CC0387decided

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 5 September 2024.#C v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Roermond.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Border control, asylum and immigration – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 15(2)(b) – Detention of a third-country national for the purpose of removal – Directive 2013/33/EU – Article 9 – Detention of an applicant for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 28(2) – Detention for the purpose of transfer – Unlawful detention – Articles 6 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-387/24 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 September 2024

Decision· DCELEX 32024D2099in force

Commission Decision (EU) 2024/2099 of 31 July 2024 confirming the participation of Ireland in Regulation (EU) 2024/1347 of the European Parliament and of the Council on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection and for the content of the protection granted

European Union · EUR-Lex · 31 July 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0123decided

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 27 June 2024.#N. A. K. and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Minden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Application for international protection – Grounds for inadmissibility – Article 2(q) – Concept of ‘subsequent application’ – Article 33(2)(d) – Rejection of an application for international protection as inadmissible by a Member State due to the rejection of a previous application made in another Member State or the discontinuation of the procedure by another Member State in respect of the previous application.#Joined Cases C-123/23 and C-202/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 June 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0003decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 June 2024.#UA v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – National criminal proceedings – OLAF investigation – Article 22 of the Staff Regulations – Serious misconduct in the course of the performance of duties – Financial liability of the member of temporary staff – Right to be heard – Causal link – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Compensation for damage suffered by the European Union – Liability.#Case T-3/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 June 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0003_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 June 2024.#UA v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – National criminal proceedings – OLAF investigation – Article 22 of the Staff Regulations – Serious misconduct in the course of the performance of duties – Financial liability of the member of temporary staff – Right to be heard – Causal link – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Compensation for damage suffered by the European Union – Liability.#Case T-3/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 June 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0831_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 June 2024.#TO v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Civil service – Temporary staff – Fixed-term contract – Termination of the contract – Article 47(b)(ii) of the CEOS – Breakdown in the relationship of trust – Right to be heard – Principle of good administration – Duty of care – Misuse of powers – Manifest error of assessment – Principle of proportionality.#Case T-831/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 June 2024

PreviousPage 3 of 4Next