Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,851 records in EU

All countriesUnited States · 41,750Ireland · 23,761United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,721France · 4,100Netherlands · 3,841Austria · 3,578European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Report· CCCELEX 62010CC0584decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 19 March 2013.#European Commission and Others v Yassin Abdullah Kadi.#Appeal — Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) — Restrictive measures taken against persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network and the Taliban — Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 — Freezing of funds and economic resources of a person included in a list drawn up by a body of the United Nations — Listing of that person’s name in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 — Action for annulment — Fundamental rights — Rights of the defence — Principle of effective judicial protection — Principle of proportionality — Right to respect for property — Obligation to state reasons.#Joined Cases C‑584/10 P, C‑593/10 P and C‑595/10 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 March 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62008TJ0588decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber), 14 March 2013.#Dole Food Company, Inc. and Dole Germany OHG v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market in bananas — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Concept of a concerted practice having an anti-competitive object — Information exchange system — Duty to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Gravity of the infringement.#Case T‑588/08.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 March 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62008TJ0587decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber), 14 March 2013.#Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc. v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market in bananas — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Information exchange system — Concept of a concerted practice having an anti-competitive object — Causal link between the collusion and the conduct of the undertakings on the market — Single infringement — Imputation of the infringement — Rights of the defence — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Cooperation — Mitigating circumstances.#Case T‑587/08.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 March 2013

Regulation· RCELEX 32013R0519in force

Commission Regulation (EU) No 519/2013 of 21 February 2013 adapting certain regulations and decisions in the fields of free movement of goods, freedom of movement for persons, right of establishment and freedom to provide services, company law, competition policy, agriculture, food safety, veterinary and phytosanitary policy, fisheries, transport policy, energy, taxation, statistics, social policy and employment, environment, customs union, external relations, and foreign, security and defence policy, by reason of the accession of Croatia

European Union · EUR-Lex · 21 February 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0427decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 February 2013.#Laboratoire Bioderma v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark BIODERMA — No infringement of the rights of the defence — Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T‑427/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 February 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0492decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber), 20 February 2013.#Melli Bank plc v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Entity wholly owned by an entity identified as being involved in nuclear proliferation — Plea of illegality — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection.#Case T‑492/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 February 2013

Proposal· PCCELEX 52013PC0051open

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION adapting certain regulations and decisions in the fields of free movement of goods, freedom of movement for persons, company law, competition policy, agriculture, food safety, veterinary and phytosanitary policy, transport policy, energy, taxation, statistics, trans-European networks, judiciary and fundamental rights, justice, freedom and security, environment, customs union, external relations, foreign, security and defence policy and institutions, by reason of the accession of Croatia

European Union · European Commission · 8 February 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0494(01)decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber), 5 February 2013 .#Bank Saderat Iran v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T‑494/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 February 2013

Report· CCCELEX 62011CC0418decided

Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi delivered on 31 January 2013.#Texdata Software GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck.#Company law — Freedom of establishment — Eleventh Directive 89/666/EEC — Disclosure of accounting documents — Branch of a capital company established in another Member State — Pecuniary penalty in the event of failure to disclose within the prescribed period — Right to effective judicial protection — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Effective, proportionate and dissuasive nature of the penalty.#Case C‑418/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 January 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0496decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber), 29 January 2013.#Bank Mellat v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T‑496/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 January 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0137decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 January 2013.#FunFactory GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional trade mark — Vibrator — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — First sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 — Rights of the defence — Second sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T‑137/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 January 2013

Record· COCELEX 62011CO0654decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 December 2012.#Transcatab SpA v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Italian market for the purchasing and primary processing of raw tobacco — Price fixing and market sharing — Attribution of liability for the unlawful conduct of a subsidiary to its parent company — Presumption of innocence — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state the reasons on which a decision is based — Principle of equal treatment.#Case C‑654/11 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 December 2012

Record· COCELEX 62011CO0593decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 December 2012.#Alliance One International, Inc. v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions or concerted practices — Italian market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Price-fixing and market-sharing — Attributability of unlawful conduct of subsidiaries to their parent companies — Presumption of innocence — Rights of defence — Obligation to state reasons.#Case C‑593/11 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 December 2012

Record· FJCELEX 62011FJ0007decided

JUDGMENT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL (Second Chamber) 13 December 2012.#AX v European Central Bank (ECB).#Civil service — ECB Staff — Disciplinary proceedings — Suspension of a staff member without reduction of his basic salary — Withdrawal of a decision — Rights of the defence — Access to the file — Statement of reasons — Reasons for a decision — Allegation of breach of professional duties — Serious misconduct.#Joined Cases F‑7/11 and F‑60/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 December 2012

Record· TJCELEX 62008TJ0103decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 December 2012.#Versalis SpA, formerly Polimeri Europa SpA and Eni SpA v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Chloroprene rubber market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price fixing and market sharing — Attributability of the unlawful conduct — Duty to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Evidence of involvement in the cartel — Single and continuous infringement — Fines — Gravity and duration of the infringement — Repeat offending — Deterrence — Attenuating circumstances — Maximum turnover limit of 10% — Cooperation — 2002 Leniency Notice — Equal treatment — Proportionality.#Case T‑103/08.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 December 2012

Record· FJCELEX 62009FJ0063decided

JUDGMENT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL (Second Chamber) 13 December 2012.#Paola Donati v European Central Bank (ECB).#Civil service — Staff of the ECB — Complaint of psychological harassment — Administrative inquiry — Access to the inquiry file — Communication of the file to the persons implicated in the complaint — Duty of confidentiality — Observance of the rights of the defence.#Case F‑63/09.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 December 2012

Record· TJCELEX 62009TJ0392decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2012.#1. garantovaná a.s. v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for calcium carbide and magnesium for the steel and gas industries in the EEA, with the exception of Ireland, Spain, Portugal and the United Kingdom — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing and market-sharing — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Fines — Ceiling of 10% of turnover — Relevant turnover — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons — Proportionality — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Ability to pay.#Case T‑392/09.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2012

Record· TJCELEX 62009TJ0410decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2012.#Almamet GmbH Handel mit Spänen und Pulvern aus Metall v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for calcium carbide and magnesium for the steel and gas industries in the EEA, with the exception of Ireland, Spain, Portugal and the United Kingdom — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing and market-sharing — Rights of the defence — Commission’s powers in inspections — Single and continuous infringement — Fines — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Proportionality — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines.#Case T‑410/09.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2012

Record· FJCELEX 62009FJ0088decided

JUDGMENT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL (Third Chamber) 5 December 2012.#Z v Court of Justice of the European Union.#Civil service — Officials — Reassignment — Interests of the service — Rule that an official’s post should correspond to his grade — Rights of the defence — Psychological harassment — Article 12 of the Staff Regulations — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Principle of sound administration — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary penalty — Written warning — Rights of the defence and adversarial principle.#Joined Cases F‑88/09 and F‑48/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 December 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62010CJ0247decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 November 2012.#Zhejiang Aokang Shoes Co., Ltd v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Dumping – Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 – Imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam – Regulation (EC) No 384/96 – Article 2(7)(b) – Market economy treatment – Article 9(6) – Individual treatment – Article 17(3) – Sampling – Article 20(5) – Rights of the defence.#Case C‑247/10 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 November 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0417decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 15 November 2012.#Council of the European Union v Nadiany Bamba.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire – Freezing of funds – Article 296 TFEU – Obligation to state the reasons on which a decision is based – Rights of the defence – Right to an effective legal remedy – Right to respect for property.#Case C‑417/11 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 November 2012

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0191decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 October 2012.#Automobili Lamborghini Holding SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for figurative Community trade mark Miura — Earlier national word and figurative marks MIURA — Rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Notification by ordinary mail — Rule 62(1) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95.#Case T‑191/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 October 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62010CJ0583decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 October 2012. # United States of America v Christine Nolan. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) - United Kingdom. # Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 98/59/EC - Protection of workers - Collective redundancies - Scope - Closure of an American military base - Information and consultation of workers - Time at which the consultation obligation arises - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court. # Case C-583/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 October 2012

Record· TJCELEX 62006TJ0353decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2012.#Vermeer Infrastructuur BV v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Existence and classification of an agreement — Restriction of competition — Guidelines on the applicability of Article 81 EC to horizontal cooperation agreements — Calculation of the amount of the fines — Gravity and duration of the infringement — Duty to state reasons — Rights of the defence.#Case T‑353/06.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2012

Record· TJCELEX 62006TJ0354decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2012.#BAM NBM Wegenbouw BV and HBG Civiel BV v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Existence and classification of an agreement — Restriction of competition — Guidelines on horizontal cooperation agreements — Rights of the defence — Fines — Duration of the infringement.#Case T‑354/06.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2012

Record· TJCELEX 62006TJ0359decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2012.#Heijmans Infrastructuur BV v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Burden of proof — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Duty to state reasons — Rights of the defence.#Case T‑359/06.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2012

Record· TJCELEX 62006TJ0357decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber), 27 September 2012.#Koninklijke Wegenbouw Stevin BV v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Existence and classification of an agreement — Restriction on competition — Guidelines on the applicability of Article 81 EC to horizontal cooperation agreements — Rights of the defence — Fine — Aggravating circumstances — Role of instigator and leader — Absence of cooperation — Commission’s powers of investigation — Right to the assistance of a lawyer — Misuse of powers — Calculation of the amount of the fines — Duration of the infringement — Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T‑357/06.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2012

Record· TJCELEX 62006TJ0343decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber), 27 September 2012.#Shell Petroleum NV and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Joint control — Fines — Aggravating circumstances — Role of instigator and leader — Repeated infringement — Duration of the infringement — Rights of the defence — Unlimited jurisdiction — Conduct of the undertaking during the administrative procedure.#Case T‑343/06.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2012

Record· TJCELEX 62006TJ0362decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber), 27 September 2012.#Ballast Nedam Infra BV v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Fines — Proof of the infringement — Gravity of the infringement — Attributability of the unlawful conduct — Rights of the defence — Production of new pleas in the course of proceedings — Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T‑362/06.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2012

Record· TJCELEX 62006TJ0361decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber), 27 September 2012.#Ballast Nedam NV v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Attributability of the unlawful conduct — Rights of the defence — Effects in relation to third parties of a judgment annulling a measure.#Case T‑361/06.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2012

Record· TJCELEX 62006TJ0370decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2012. # Kuwait Petroleum Corp., Kuwait Petroleum International Ltd and Kuwait Petroleum (Nederland) BV v European Commission. # Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Fines - Cooperation during the administrative procedure - Significant added value - Equal treatment - Rights of the defence. # Case T-370/06.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2012

Record· COCELEX 62011CO0495decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber), 13 September 2012.#Total SA and Elf Aquitaine SA v European Commission.#Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Infringement of the principles of conferred powers and of proportionality — Manifestly incorrect interpretation — Infringement of the rights of the defence and of the principles of equity and of the equality of arms — Duty to state reasons.#Case C‑495/11 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2012

Record· TOCELEX 62011TO0564decided

Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 5 September 2012.#Nigel Paul Farage v European Parliament and Jerzy Buzek.#Law governing the institutions — Decision of the President of the Parliament imposing on a Member of the Parliament the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the daily subsistence allowance for a period of 10 days — Decision of the Committee on Legal Affairs of the Parliament declaring inadmissible the Member’s request for defence of his Parliamentary immunity — Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the General Court — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T‑564/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 September 2012

PreviousPage 37 of 38Next