Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

2,001 records in EU

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62007TJ0122decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 3 March 2011.#Siemens AG Österreich and VA Tech Transmission & Distribution GmbH & Co. KEG (T-122/07), Siemens Transmission & Distribution Ltd (T-123/07) and Siemens Transmission & Distribution SA and Nuova Magrini Galileo SpA (T-124/07) v European Commission.#Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market in gas insulated switchgear projects - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Market-sharing - Effects within the common market - Notion of continuous infringement - Duration of the infringement - Limitation period - Fines - Proportionality - Ceiling of 10% of turnover - Joint and several liability for payment of a fine - Mitigating circumstances - Cooperation - Rights of the defence.#Joined cases T-122/07 to T-124/07.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 March 2011

Record· TJCELEX 62007TJ0117decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 3 March 2011.#Areva and Others (T-117/07) and Alstom (T-121/07) v European Commission.#Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market in gas insulated switchgear projects - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Rights of the defence - Duty to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Whether answerable for the infringement - Duration of the infringement - Fines - Joint and several liability for payment of a fine - Aggravating circumstances - Role of leader - Mitigating circumstances - Cooperation.#Cases T-117/07 and T-121/07.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 March 2011

Report· CCCELEX 62009CC0521decided

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Mengozzi delivered on 17 February 2011.#Elf Aquitaine SA v European Commission.#Appeal – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Market for monochloroacetic acid – Rules on the imputability to the parent company of the anti-competitive practices of a subsidiary – Presumption of the actual exercise of decisive influence – Rights of the defence – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-521/09 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 February 2011

Record· TJCELEX 62009TJ0122decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 February 2011.#Zhejiang Xinshiji Foods Co. Ltd and Hubei Xinshiji Foods Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union.#Dumping – Imports of prepared or preserved citrus fruits originating in the People’s Republic of China – Rights of the defence – Duty to state reasons – Principle of sound administration – Article 15(2) and Article 20(4) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 15(2) and Article 20(4) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009).#Case T-122/09.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 February 2011

Record· TJCELEX 62009TJ0013decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 17 December 2010.#August Storck KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Community trade mark - Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark - Shape of a chocolate mouse - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Rights of the defence.#Case T-13/09.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2010

Record· TJCELEX 62006TJ0231decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, extended composition) of 16 December 2010.#Kingdom of the Netherlands (T-231/06) and Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (NOS) (T-237/06) v European Commission.#State aid - Public service broadcasting -Measures taken by the Netherlands authorities - Decision declaring State aid compatible in part and incompatible in part with the common market - New aid or existing aid - Concept of State aid - Concept of undertaking - Overcompensation for the costs of the public service mission - Proportionality - Duty to give reasons - Rights of the defence.#Joined cases T-231/06 and T-237/06.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2010

Report· CCCELEX 62009CC0352decided

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Bot delivered on 26 October 2010.#ThyssenKrupp Nirosta GmbH v European Commission.#Appeals - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Community market in stainless steel flat products - Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Powers of the Commission - Principles of nulla poena sine lege and res judicata - Rights of the defence - Attributability of the unlawful conduct - Transfer of liability by means of a statement - Limitation period - Cooperation during the administrative procedure.#Case C-352/09 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 October 2010

Report· CCCELEX 62009CC0201decided

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Bot delivered on 26 October 2010.#ArcelorMittal Luxembourg SA v European Commission (C-201/09 P) and European Commission v ArcelorMittal Luxembourg SA and Others (C-216/09 P).#Appeals - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Community market in steel beams - Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Powers of the Commission - Attributability of the unlawful conduct - Res judicata - Rights of the defence - Limitation period - Suspension of the limitation period - Effect erga omnes or inter partes - No statement of reasons.#Joined cases C-201/09 P and C-216/09 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 October 2010

Record· TJCELEX 62006TJ0314decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2010.#Whirlpool Europe Srl v Council of the European Union.#Dumping - Imports of certain combined refrigerator-freezers originating in South Korea - Definition of the product concerned - Rights of the defence - Advisory Committee - Duty to state reasons - Choice of the method used to define the product concerned - Article 15(2) and Article 20(5) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 15(2) and Article 20(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009).#Case T-314/06.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2010

Record· TJCELEX 62005TJ0319decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2010.#Confédération suisse v European Commission.#External relations - Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport - German measures relating to the approaches to Zurich airport - Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 - Rights of the defence - Principle of non-discrimination - Principle of proportionality.#Case T-319/05.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 September 2010

Record· TJCELEX 62005TJ0029decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 September 2010.#Deltafina SpA v European Commission.#Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices -Spanish market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Price-fixing and market-sharing - Consistency between the statement of objections and the contested decision - Rights of the defence - Definition of the relevant market - Fines - Gravity of the infringement - Aggravating circumstances - Role as leader - Cooperation.#Case T-29/05.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 September 2010

Record· TJCELEX 62007TJ0428decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 June 2010.#Centre d’étude et de valorisation des algues SA (CEVA) v European Commission.#Arbitration clause - Contracts entered into under a specific research, technological development and demonstration programme in the field of 'Quality of life and management of living resources (1998-2002)' - Seahealth and Biopal projects - Debit notes - Applications for annulment - Reclassification of the actions - Admissibility - Rule that the parties should be heard and rights of the defence - Recovery of all the financial contributions paid by the European Union - Serious financial irregularities.#Joined cases T-428/07 and T-455/07.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 June 2010

Record· TJCELEX 62008TJ0181decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 May 2010.#Pye Phyo Tay Za v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Myanmar - Freezing of funds - Action for annulment - Joint legal basis of Articles 60 EC and 301 EC - Obligation to state the reasons on which a decision is based - Rights of the defence - Right to effective judicial review - Right to respect for property - Proportionality.#Case T-181/08.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 May 2010

Record· TJCELEX 62005TJ0446decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 April 2010.#Amann & Söhne GmbH & Co. KG and Cousin Filterie SAS v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European market in industrial thread – Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Concept of a single infringement – Definition of the market – Fines – Upper limit for the fine – Gravity and duration of the infringement – Mitigating circumstances – Cooperation – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Rights of the defence – Guidelines on the method of setting fines.#Case T-446/05.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 April 2010

Record· TJCELEX 62008TJ0110decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 27 April 2010.#Freixenet, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Community trade mark - Application for a Community trade mark representing a frosted black matt bottle - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - No distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(1)(b) and 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009).#Case T-110/08.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2010

Record· TJCELEX 62008TJ0109decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 27 April 2010.#Freixenet, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Community trade mark - Application for a Community trade mark representing a frosted white bottle - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - No distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(1)(b) and 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009).#Case T-109/08.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2010

Decision· DCELEX 32010D0184in force

2010/184/CFSP: Political and Security Committee Decision ATALANTA/1/2010 of 5 March 2010 amending Political and Security Committee Decision ATALANTA/2/2009 on the acceptance of third States’ contributions to the European Union military operation to contribute to the deterrence, prevention and repression of acts of piracy and armed robbery off the Somali coast (Atalanta) and Political and Security Committee Decision ATALANTA/3/2009 on the setting up of the Committee of Contributors for the European Union military operation to contribute to the deterrence, prevention and repression of acts of piracy and armed robbery off the Somali coast (Atalanta)

European Union · EUR-Lex · 5 March 2010

Record· TJCELEX 62006TJ0410decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 March 2010.#Foshan City Nanhai Golden Step Industrial Co., Ltd v Council of the European Union.#Dumping - Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam - Calculation of the constructed normal value - Export price - Rights of the defence - Injury - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based.#Case T-410/06.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 March 2010

Record· TJCELEX 62006TJ0407decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 March 2010.#Zhejiang Aokang Shoes Co., Ltd (T-407/06) and Wenzhou Taima Shoes Co., Ltd (T-408/06) v Council of the European Union.#Dumping - Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam - Market economy treatment - Individual treatment - Sampling - Rights of the defence - Equal treatment - Injury - Legitimate expectations - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based.#Joined cases T-407/06 and T-408/06.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 March 2010

Record· TJCELEX 62007TJ0321decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 March 2010.#Lufthansa AirPlus Servicekarten GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark A+ - Earlier Community word mark AirPlus International - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Lack of similarity between the signs - Duty to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Articles 8(1)(b) and (5), 73, 74 and 79 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Articles 8(1)(b) and (5), 75, 76 and 83 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009).#Case T-321/07.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 March 2010

PreviousPage 40 of 41Next