PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

other · European Union

31663e77-8928-11e6-9818-01aa75ed71a1

31663e77-8928-11e6-9818-01aa75ed71a1

Members

  • No memberships ingested for this organization yet.

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0010decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 June 2026.#Dürr Dental SE v Cattani Deutschland Helmes GmbH & Co. KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medical devices – Regulation (EU) 2017/745 – CE marking of a medical device falling under risk class IIa – Oil-free dry air compressors for the production of compressed air for dental treatment – Making available on the market – Obligations of distributors – Verification of the classification as a ‘medical device’ where the manufacturer has affixed a CE marking to the device in question as ‘machinery’.#Case C-10/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0326decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 June 2026.#CY v VPD Nachalnik na 03 Rayonno upravlenie na Stolichna direktsia na vatreshnite raboti.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Police cooperation – Schengen Information System – Decision 2007/533/JHA – Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 – Alert on a motor vehicle for the purposes of seizure or use as evidence in criminal proceedings – Order to surrender a vehicle for which an alert has been issued in the Schengen Information System – National legislation precluding the person who was in possession of the object for which an alert has been issued from participating in the administrative and judicial procedure for the surrender of the object to the issuing Member State.#Case C-326/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0717decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#BD v Sociálna poisťovňa, ústredie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší správny súd Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Coordination of social security systems – Retirement pensions – Article 51(1) – Periods of insurance completed in a specific activity as an employed or self-employed person or in an occupation which is subject to a special scheme – Concept of ‘special scheme’ – Rules for aggregating periods of insurance – National legislation which treats workers coming within certain categories more favourably – Articles 45 and 48 TFEU – Free movement of workers.#Case C-717/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 May 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0877decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#X and Minister van Asiel en Migratie, anciennement Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v Y.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Articles 6, 8 and 9 – Illegally staying third-country nationals imprisoned for a long term or for life – Possibility of adopting a return decision – Procedural safeguards.#Case C-877/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 May 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0748decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 April 2026.#Criminal proceedings against AC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Mestský súd Bratislava I.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Articles 3 and 4 – Presumption of innocence – Article 48(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Order that no further action be taken – Judicial decision that is not a decision on guilt – Setting aside and referral back to a lower court – Findings made by the higher court as to whether the constituent elements of the offence concerned are present – Obligation on the part of the lower court to comply with the rulings of the higher court – Appropriate measures in the event of breach of the presumption of innocence.#Case C-748/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 April 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0811decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#Pescheria Il Granchio Blu di JC v Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – De minimis aid – Regulation (EU) No 1407/2013 – Regulation (EU) No 1408/2013 – Regulation (EU) No 717/2014 – Respective scopes – Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013 – Fishery and aquaculture sector – Common organisation of the markets – Undertakings operating in the production, processing and marketing of fishery products – Retail trade – National legislation providing for de minimis aid for undertakings located in zones affected by earthquakes.#Case C-811/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 April 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0761decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#HM and JD v AXA Bank Belgium SA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts concluded between a seller or supplier and a consumer – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 2(c) – Concept of ‘seller or supplier’ – Article 6(1) – Effects of the finding that such a term is unfair – Invalidity of the contract – Article 7(1) – Deterrent effect of the prohibition on unfair terms – Loan agreement denominated in foreign currency – Contractual term placing the exchange rate risk on the consumer – Transfer of a contract among sellers or suppliers under national law – Seller or supplier against whom the consumer may assert the legal consequences of the invalidity of an unfair term in the transferred contract.#Case C-761/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 April 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0294decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#UD, VO, GT et KJ, en leur nom propre et en tant qu’associés de la Società Agricola UD e co. and Others v Agenzia Veneta per i pagamenti (AVEPA).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Milk and milk products – Regulation (EC) No 595/2004 – Deliveries made to non-approved purchasers – Article 24(1) – Concept of ‘penalty’ – Additional levy payable by the producer – Levy calculated on the basis of the total quantity of the product delivered – Proportionality – Rights of the defence and right to an effective remedy.#Case C-294/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 March 2026

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0403decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#PRVO PLINARSKO DRUŠTVO d.o.o. v Gazprom export LLC and Privredna banka Zagreb d.d.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 19(1), second subparagraph, TEU – Effective judicial protection in matters covered by EU law – Independence of judges – Court established in advance by law – Fair trial – National legislation providing for the establishment of a ‘registration judge’ in courts of second instance who, in practice, has the power to suspend the delivery of a judgment – Incompatibility of that practice – Final nature of the judgment concerned – Regulation (EU) 2020/1998 – Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 – Irrelevance of the interpretation sought – Hypothetical question – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-403/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0633decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 January 2026.#F.F. v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Equal treatment – Aggregation of periods – Article 58 – Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons – Invalidity benefits – Supplement in order to guarantee receipt of the statutory minimum invalidity benefit – Stricter conditions relating to the contribution period for workers who have exercised their right to freedom of movement.#Case C-633/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 January 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0598decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 19 January 2026.#Kurt Hesse v Ferrari SpA and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-598/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 January 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0597decided

Order of the Court of 19 January 2026.#Kurt Hesse v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-597/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0075decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#XH v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Allegations of psychological harassment during periods of sick leave – Rejection of the request for assistance and of the claim for compensation – Opening of an invalidity procedure – Action for annulment and for damages – Admissibility – Acts open to challenge – Obligation on the part of the General Court of the European Union to state reasons – Contradictory reasoning – Distortion of the facts and evidence.#Case C-75/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0259decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#SAS Tenergie Development v Directeur Régional des Douanes de Marseille and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Import and export procedures – Repayment or remission of import or export duties – Transmission of the file requesting remission to the European Commission – Automatic remission of duties – Liability of the Member State – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-259/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0448decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 2 TEU – Article 4(3) TEU – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law – Principles of autonomy, primacy, effectiveness and the uniform application of EU law – Principle of the binding effect of the case-law of the Court – Judgments of the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court, Poland) – Judgments of the Court and interim measures under Article 279 TFEU relating to the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rejection by the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court) of those judgments and of those measures as ultra vires – National constitutional identity – Prohibition issued by the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court) preventing all public authorities from applying Article 2 TEU and the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Requirement of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Improper composition of the Trybunał Konstytucyjny (Constitutional Court).#Case C-448/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0372decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 December 2025.#B. B. v Ministarstvo pravosuđa, uprave i digitalne transformacije Republike Hrvatske.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravni sud u Rijeci.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Remuneration of judges of first instance – Article 19(1), second subparagraph, TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of judicial independence – Powers of the legislatures and executives of the Member States to set the detailed rules for determining judges’ remuneration – Requirement that remuneration is commensurate with the importance of the functions carried out – Obligation to take into account the national socio-economic context.#Case C-372/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2025

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0257decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 December 2025.#B.V. v I.J.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Neamţ.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judges’ retirement pensions – Basis of calculation – No account taken of posting allowance – Exclusion for reasons linked to requirements to eliminate a government deficit – Article 2 TEU – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Principle of judicial independence – Powers of the Member States’ legislature and executive to reduce judges’ remuneration – Conditions.#Case C-257/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 December 2025

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0124decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 December 2025.#VA v BNP Paribas Bank Polska S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Apelacyjny w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 100(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Dispute in the main proceedings which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate.#Case C-124/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 December 2025

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0373decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 November 2025.#Roata SRL, par liquidateur Braudit SPRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală and Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Braşov.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 53(2) and 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to indicate the link between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-373/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 November 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0197decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#AK v RU.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Mestský súd Bratislava IV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/7/EU – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Scope – Article 2(1) and (3) – Concept of ‘undertaking’ – Concept of ‘commercial transaction’ – Contract for the provision of legal services with a view to setting up a commercial company – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 2(b) – Concept of ‘consumer’ – Natural person who engaged the services of a lawyer with a view to setting up a commercial company.#Case C-197/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2025

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0475decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 November 2025.#Fashion TV RO SRL and Maestro SPRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Galaţi - Serviciul Soluţionare Contestaţii - Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Constanța and Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Galați - Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Constanța – Activitatea de Inspecţie Fiscală.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanţa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 168 – Right to deduct VAT – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial – Article 50 – Principle ne bis in idem – Discontinuance of criminal proceedings in respect of natural persons – Administrative procedure relating to a company having the capacity of taxable person – Examination of evidence obtained during the criminal proceedings – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Answer which may be clearly deduced from the existing case-law.#Case C-475/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 November 2025