Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · EU

Agriculture

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

39 records in EU in 2012

All countriesSearch this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0670decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber), 13 December 2012.#Etablissement national des produits de l’agriculture et de la mer (FranceAgriMer) v Vinifrance SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the le Conseil d’État (France).#Protection of the European Union’s financial interests — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 — Articles 4 and 5 — Administrative penalty — Administrative measure — Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 — Aid for the private storage of concentrated grape must — Community origin — Regulation (EEC) No 1059/83 — Long-term storage contract — Article 2(2) — Article 17(1)(b) — Reduction of the amount of aid in relation to the seriousness of the breach committed.#Case C‑670/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 December 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62012CJ0011decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber), 13 December 2012.#Maatschap L. A. en D. A. B. Langestraat en P. Langestraat-Troost v Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken, Landbouw en Innovatie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven.#Common agricultural policy — Integrated administration and control system — Reduction of or exclusion from payments in the event of non-compliance with cross-compliance rules — Vicarious liability.#Case C‑11/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 December 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0562decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber), 6 December 2012.#Société d’Exportation de Produits Agricoles SA (SEPA) v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Agriculture — Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87 — Article 11 — Export refunds — Request for a refund in respect of exported goods which do not confer entitlement to a refund — Administrative penalty.#Case C‑562/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 December 2012

Record· COCELEX 62011CO0627decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 November 2012.#S.C. „AUGUSTUS” S.R.L. Iaşi v Agenţia de Plăţi pentru Dezvoltare Rurală şi Pescuit.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Inalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie — Interpretation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1268/1999 of 21 June 1999 on Community support for pre-accession measures for agriculture and rural development in the applicant countries of central and eastern Europe in the pre-accession period (OJ 1999 L 161, p. 87) and Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds (OJ 1999 L 161, p. 1) — Cancellation and recovery, in the event of improper conduct, of Community funding granted under the SAPARD programme — Eligibility of expenditure — Cases of force majeure — Justification — Notions of ‘economic efficiency’ and ‘profitability’.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C‑627/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 November 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0131decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber), 15 November 2012.#Pfeifer & Langen KG v Hauptzollamt Aachen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf.#Agriculture – Regulation (EEC) No 1443/82 – Article 3(4) – Application of the quota system in the sugar sector – Surplus quantity of sugar found by the national authorities of a Member State during an a posteriori investigation carried out at the producer’s premises – Whether that surplus is to be taken into account when establishing the final production figures for the marketing year during which the difference came to light.#Case C‑131/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 November 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0592decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber), 25 October 2012.#Anssi Ketelä.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus.#Agriculture – Regulations (EC) No 1698/2005 and 1974/2006 – Setting up aid for young farmers – Conditions for grant – Setting up for the first time on an agricultural holding as head of the holding – Conditions governing applicability where the person concerned sets up using a legal person.#Case C‑592/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 October 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62011CC0401decided

Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 23 October 2012.#Blanka Soukupová v Ministerstvo zemědělství.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud.#Agriculture — EAGGF — Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 — Support for rural development — Early retirement support — Transferor not less than 55 years old but not yet of normal retirement age at the time of transfer — Concept of ‘normal retirement age’ — National legislation determining a retirement age which varies depending on the sex of the applicant and, for women, on the number of children raised — General principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination.#Case C‑401/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 October 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0390decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber), 4 October 2012.#CS AGRO Ronov s. r. o. v Ministerstvo zemědělství.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud.#Agriculture — Sugar sector — Common organisation of the markets — Application for restructuring aid — Undertaking by the producer to cease delivery of a certain quantity of quota sugar beet — Definition — Unilateral declaration of the producer — Refusal to grant aid — Need to terminate the existing delivery contract.#Case C‑390/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2012

Record· TJCELEX 62009TJ0139decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber), 27 September 2012.#French Republic v European Commission.#State aid — Fruit and vegetable sector — ‘Contingency plans’ seeking to support the fruit and vegetable market in France — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market — Concept of State aid — State resources — Co-financing by a public institution and by voluntary contributions from farmers’ organisations — Arguments not raised during the administrative procedure — Duty to state reasons.#Case T‑139/09.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0036decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber), 6 September 2012.#Pioneer Hi Bred Italia Srl v Ministero delle Politiche agricole alimentari e forestali.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Agriculture — Genetically modified organisms — Council Directive 2002/53/EC — Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Genetically modified organisms accepted for inclusion in the common catalogue — Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 — Article 20 — Existing products — Directive 2001/18/EC — Article 26a — Measures to avoid the unintended presence of genetically modified organisms — National measures prohibiting the cultivation of genetically modified organisms accepted for inclusion in the common catalogue and authorised as existing products pending measures based on Article 26a of Directive 2001/18/EC.#Case C‑36/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 September 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62010CJ0608decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber), 12 July 2012.#Südzucker AG and Others v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg.#Agriculture — Export refunds — Incorrect indication of the exporter in the export declaration — National legislation making entitlement to an export refund subject to the entry of the applicant as the exporter in the export declaration — Correction of the export declaration after the goods have been released.#Joined Cases C‑608/10, C‑10/11, C‑23/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 July 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0059decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 12 July 2012.#Association Kokopelli v Graines Baumaux SAS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Nancy.#Agriculture — Directives 98/95/EC, 2002/53/EC, 2002/55/EC and 2009/145/EC — Validity — Vegetables — Sale on the national seed market of vegetable seed not included in the official common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Non-compliance with system of prior authorisation for marketing — International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture — Principle of proportionality — Freedom to conduct a business — Free movement of goods — Equal treatment.#Case C‑59/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 July 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62010CJ0318decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber), 5 July 2012.#Société d’investissement pour l’agriculture tropicale SA (SIAT) v État belge.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium).#Freedom to provide services — Tax legislation — Deduction as business expenses of expenses incurred as payment for the provision of services — Expenses incurred in relation to a service provider established in another Member State in which that provider is not subject to tax on income or is subject there to a tax regime which is appreciably more advantageous — Deductibility conditional upon the provision of proof of the genuine and proper nature of the services and the normal nature of the related payments — Obstacle — Justification — Combating tax evasion and avoidance — Effectiveness of fiscal supervision — Balanced allocation between Member States of the power to impose taxes — Proportionality.#Case C‑318/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 July 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0355decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 June 2012.#G. Brouwer v Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken, Landbouw en Innovatie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven — Interpretation of Council Directive 91/629/EEC of 19 November 1991 laying down minimum standards for the protection of calves (OJ 1991 L 340, p. 28) and of Articles 4 and 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulations (EEC) No 2019/93, (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001, (EC) No 1454/2001, (EC) No 1868/94, (EC) No 1251/1999, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1673/2000, (EEC) No 2358/71 and (EC) No 2529/2001 (OJ 2003 L 270, p. 1) — National legislation transposing the Directive by stating that the management requirements apply not only to calves confined for rearing and fattening, but also to calves confined for dairy farming.#Directive 91/629/EEC — Minimum standards for the protection of calves — Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 — Common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy — National legislation transposing Directive 91/629/EEC and declaring the management requirements provided for by that directive to be applicable to, inter alia, calves which are kept confined in the context of a dairy farming operation.#Case C-355/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 June 2012

Record· TOCELEX 62009TO0440decided

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 June 2012.#Azienda Agricola Bracesco Srl v European Commission.#Non‑contractual liability — Agriculture — Bird flu — Exceptional market support measures in the eggs and poultry sector — Non‑inclusion of quails among the poultry types for which compensation is available — Equal treatment and non‑discrimination — No causal link — Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law.#Case T‑440/09.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 June 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0188decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber), 24 May 2012.#Peter Hehenberger v Republik Österreich.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien.#Agriculture — European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund — Regulations (EC) Nos 1257/1999 and 817/2004 — Financial support for agri‑environmental production methods — Checks — Beneficiary of agricultural aid — Fact of having prevented an on‑the‑spot check from being carried out — National legislation requiring the repayment of all aid paid over several years — Whether compatible.#Case C‑188/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 May 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62010CJ0368decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 10 May 2012.#European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2004/18/EC — Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Contract for the supply, installation and maintenance of dispensing machines for hot drinks, and the supply of tea, coffee and other ingredients — Article 23(6) and (8) — Technical specifications — Article 26 — Conditions for performance of the contract — Article 53(1) — Criteria for award of the contracts — Most economically advantageous tender — Products derived from organic agriculture and fair trade — Use of labels in the formulation of the technical specifications and the award criteria — Article 39(2) — Concept of ‘additional information’ — Article 2 — Principles for award of contracts — Principle of transparency — Articles 44(2) and 48 — Verification of the suitability and choice of participants — Minimum level of technical or professional abilities — Compliance with ‘criteria of sustainability of purchases and socially responsible business’.#Case C‑368/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 May 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62011CC0036decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 26 April 2012.#Pioneer Hi Bred Italia Srl v Ministero delle Politiche agricole alimentari e forestali.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Agriculture — Genetically modified organisms — Council Directive 2002/53/EC — Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Genetically modified organisms accepted for inclusion in the common catalogue — Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 — Article 20 — Existing products — Directive 2001/18/EC — Article 26a — Measures to avoid the unintended presence of genetically modified organisms — National measures prohibiting the cultivation of genetically modified organisms accepted for inclusion in the common catalogue and authorised as existing products pending measures based on Article 26a of Directive 2001/18/EC.#Case C‑36/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62009CJ0443decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 19 April 2012.#Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura (CCIAA) di Cosenza v Grillo Star Srl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Cosenza.#Directive 2008/7/EC — Indirect taxes on the raising of capital — Articles 5(1)(c) and 6(1)(e) — Scope — Annual duty paid to local chambers of commerce, industry, crafts and agriculture.#Case C‑443/09.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 April 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62011CC0131decided

Opinion of the Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 29 March 2012.#Pfeifer & Langen KG v Hauptzollamt Aachen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf.#Agriculture – Regulation (EEC) No 1443/82 – Article 3(4) – Application of the quota system in the sugar sector – Surplus quantity of sugar found by the national authorities of a Member State during an a posteriori investigation carried out at the producer’s premises – Whether that surplus is to be taken into account when establishing the final production figures for the marketing year during which the difference came to light.#Case C‑131/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 March 2012

Record· TJCELEX 62007TJ0248decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 March 2012.#Czech Republic v European Commission.#Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Measures to be adopted due to the accession of new Member States — 2003 Act of Accession — Determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar and the financial consequences of their elimination — Objective pursued by a provision of primary legislation — Decision 2007/361/EC.#Case T-248/07.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 March 2012

Record· TJCELEX 62007TJ0243decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 March 2012.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Measures to be adopted as a result of the accession of new Member States — 2003 Act of Accession — Determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar, and the financial consequences of their elimination — Objective pursued by a provision of primary law — Decision 2007/361/EC.#Case T-243/07.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 March 2012

Record· TJCELEX 62007TJ0262decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber), 29 March 2012.#Republic of Lithuania v European Commission.#Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Measures to be adopted as a result of the accession of new Member States — 2003 Act of Accession — Determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar, and the financial consequences of their elimination — Objective pursued by a provision of primary law — Decision 2007/361/EC.#Case T‑262/07.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 March 2012

Record· TJCELEX 62007TJ0247decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 March 2012.#Slovak Republic v European Commission.#Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Measures to be adopted on account of the accession of new Member States — 2003 Act of Accession — Determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar and financial consequences of their elimination — Objective pursued by a provision of primary law — Decision 2007/361/EC.#Case T-247/07.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 March 2012

Record· TOCELEX 62010TO0453decided

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 March 2012.#Northern Ireland Department of Agriculture and Rural Development v European Commission.#Action for annulment — EAGGF, EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure incurred by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland — Expenditure excluded from European Union financing — Devolved administration — No direct concern — Inadmissibility.#Case T‑453/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62011CC0059decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 19 January 2012.#Association Kokopelli v Graines Baumaux SAS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Nancy.#Agriculture — Directives 98/95/EC, 2002/53/EC, 2002/55/EC and 2009/145/EC — Validity — Vegetables — Sale on the national seed market of vegetable seed not included in the official common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Non-compliance with system of prior authorisation for marketing — International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture — Principle of proportionality — Freedom to conduct a business — Free movement of goods — Equal treatment.#Case C‑59/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 January 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62009CC0443decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 12 January 2012.#Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura (CCIAA) di Cosenza v Grillo Star Srl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Cosenza.#Directive 2008/7/EC — Indirect taxes on the raising of capital — Articles 5(1)(c) and 6(1)(e) — Scope — Annual duty paid to local chambers of commerce, industry, crafts and agriculture.#Case C‑443/09.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 January 2012