PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

other · European Union

233d79cc-67e5-4048-9fd0-fda2509029b4

233d79cc-67e5-4048-9fd0-fda2509029b4

Members

  • No memberships ingested for this organization yet.

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0608decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 June 2016.#Compañía Española de Petróleos (CEPSA), SA v European Commission.#Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Article 81 EC — Spanish market for penetration bitumen — Market sharing and price coordination — Excessive duration of the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union — Excessive duration of the procedure before the European Commission — Appeal on the costs.#Case C-608/13 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2016

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0617decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 June 2016.#Repsol Lubricantes y Especialidades, SA and Others v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 81 EC — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Spanish market for penetration bitumen — Market sharing and price coordination — Notice on immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases (2002) — Final paragraph of point 23(b) — Partial immunity from fines — Evidence of facts previously unknown to the Commission.#Case C-617/13 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2016

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0616decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 June 2016.#Productos Asfálticos (PROAS), SA v European Commission.#Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Article 81 EC — Spanish market for penetration bitumen — Market sharing and price coordination — Excessive duration of the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union — Excessive duration of the procedure before the European Commission — Appeal on the costs.#Case C-616/13 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2016

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0324decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 April 2016.#Partner Apelski Dariusz v Zarząd Oczyszczania Miasta.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2004/18/EC — Technical and/or professional abilities of economic operators — Article 48(3) — Possibility to rely on the capacities of other entities — Conditions and procedures — Nature of the links between the tenderer and the other entities — Amendment of the tender — Annulment and repetition of an electronic auction — Directive 2014/24/EU.#Case C-324/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 April 2016

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0286decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 March 2016.#European Parliament v European Commission.#Action for annulment — Article 290 TFEU — Concepts of ‘amending’ and ‘supplementing’ — Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 — Article 21(3) — Scope of the power conferred on the European Commission — Need to adopt a separate legislative act — Delegated Regulation (EU) No 275/2014.#Case C-286/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 March 2016

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0283decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 January 2016.#CM Eurologistik GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg and Grünwald Logistik Service GmbH (GLS) v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf and Finanzgericht Hamburg.#References for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 158/2013 — Validity — Anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits originating in China — Effect to be given to a judgment having found a preceding regulation to be invalid — Reopening of the initial investigation to determine the normal value — Reimposition of the anti-dumping duty on the basis of the same data — Investigation period to be taken into account.#Joined Cases C-283/14 and C-284/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 January 2016

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0603decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 January 2016.#Galp Energía España SA and Others v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 81 EC — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Spanish market for penetration bitumen — Market sharing and price coordination — Excessive length of the proceedings before the General Court — Article 261 TFEU — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 31 — Unlimited jurisdiction — Article 264 TFEU — Annulment, in whole or in part, of the Commission’s decision.#Case C-603/13 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 January 2016

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0025decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 December 2015.#Union des syndicats de l'immobilier (UNIS) v Ministre du Travail, de l’Emploi et de la Formation professionnelle et du Dialogue social et Syndicat national des résidences de tourisme (SNRT) and Others and Beaudout Père et Fils SARL v Ministre du Travail, de l’Emploi et de la Formation professionnelle et du Dialogue social and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 56 TFEU — Freedom to provide services — Principles of equality and of non-discrimination — Obligation of transparency — Scope of that obligation — National collective agreements — Social protection scheme supplemental to the general scheme — Appointment by the social partners of an insurer responsible for managing that scheme — Extension of that scheme by ministerial order to all employees and employers of the sector concerned — Limitation of the temporal effects of a preliminary ruling of the Court of Justice.#Joined Cases C-25/14 and C-26/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0439decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 November 2015.#Elitaliana SpA v Eulex Kosovo.#Appeal — Public service contracts — Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP — Call for tenders for helicopter support for the Eulex Mission in Kosovo — Action brought against the decision awarding the contract — Article 24(1), second subparagraph, TEU — Article 275, first paragraph, TFEU — Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Jurisdiction of the Court — Article 263, first paragraph, TFEU — Meaning of ‘bodies, offices or agencies of the Union’ — Measures attributable to the European Commission — Excusable error.#Case C-439/13 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 November 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0174decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 October 2015.#Saudaçor – Sociedade Gestora de Recursos e Equipamentos da Saúde dos Açores SA v Fazenda Pública.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 13(1) — Treatment as a non-taxable person — Concept of ‘body governed by public law’ — Limited company which is responsible for the provision of services in respect of the planning and management of the health service of the Autonomous Region of the Azores — Determination of the detailed arrangements for those services, including their remuneration, in programme agreements concluded between that company and that region.#Case C-174/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 October 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0354decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 October 2015.#SC Capoda Import-Export SRL v Registrul Auto Român and Benone-Nicolae Bejan.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Cluj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Free movement of goods — Measures having equivalent effect — Products in free circulation in Germany — Products subject to homologation inspections in Romania — Certificate of conformity issued by a distributor in another Member State — Certificate deemed insufficient to allow the free marketing of those products — Principle of mutual recognition — Partly inadmissible.#Case C-354/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 October 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0471decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 October 2015.#Seattle Genetics Inc. v Österreichisches Patentamt.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual and industrial property — Proprietary medicinal products — Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 — Article 13(1) — Supplementary protection certificate — Duration — Concept of the ‘date of the first authorisation to place the product on the market in the European Union’ — Whether account is to be taken of the date of the decision granting authorisation or the date on which notification was given of that decision.#Case C-471/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 October 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0069decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2015.#Dragoș Constantin Târșia v Statul român and Serviciul Public Comunitar Regim Permise de Conducere si Inmatriculare a Autovehiculelor.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Sibiu.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Principles of equivalence and effectiveness — Res judicata — Recovery of undue payments — Recovery of taxes levied by a Member State in breach of EU law — Final decision of a court or tribunal imposing payment of a tax which is incompatible with EU law — Application for revision of such a decision — National legislation allowing the revision, in the light of later preliminary rulings given by the Court, of final decisions of a court or tribunal made exclusively in administrative proceedings.#Case C-69/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 October 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0061decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2015.#Orizzonte Salute - Studio Infermieristico Associato v Azienda Pubblica di Servizi alla persona San Valentino – Città di Levico Terme and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale regionale di giustizia amministrativa di Trento.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 89/665/EEC — Public procurement — National legislation — Fees for access to administrative proceedings in the field of public procurement — Right to an effective remedy — Dissuasive fees — Judicial review of administrative decisions — Principles of effectiveness and equivalence — Effectiveness.#Case C-61/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 October 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0203decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2015.#Consorci Sanitari del Maresme v Corporació de Salut del Maresme i la Selva.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Català de Contractes del Sector Públic.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Jurisdiction of the Court — Status of the referring body as a court or tribunal — Independence — Compulsory jurisdiction — Directive 89/665/EEC — Article 2 — Bodies responsible for review procedures — Directive 2004/18/EC — Articles 1(8) and 52 — Public procurement procedures — Meaning of ‘public entity’ — Public authorities — Inclusion.#Case C-203/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 October 2015

Report· CCCELEX 62014CC0286decided

Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 1 October 2015.#European Parliament v European Commission.#Action for annulment — Article 290 TFEU — Concepts of ‘amending’ and ‘supplementing’ — Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 — Article 21(3) — Scope of the power conferred on the European Commission — Need to adopt a separate legislative act — Delegated Regulation (EU) No 275/2014.#Case C-286/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0452decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2015.#Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA) and Ministero della Salute v Doc Generici srl.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Obligation to bring the matter before the Court of Justice — Approximation of laws — Proprietary medicinal products — Medicinal products for human use — Marketing authorisation — Variation — Fees — Regulation (EC) No 297/95 — Regulation (EC) No 1234/2008 — Scope.#Case C-452/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0276decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 September 2015.#Gmina Wrocław v Minister Finansów.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 9(1) — Article 13(1) — Taxable persons — Interpretation of the word ‘independently’ — Municipal body — Economic activities carried out by an organisational entity of a municipality other than as a public authority — Whether such an entity may be regarded as a ‘taxable person’ within the meaning of the provisions of Directive 2006/112 — Articles 4(2) and 5(3) TEU.#Case C-276/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 September 2015

Report· CCCELEX 62014CC0283decided

Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 24 September 2015.#CM Eurologistik GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg and Grünwald Logistik Service GmbH (GLS) v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf and Finanzgericht Hamburg.#References for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 158/2013 — Validity — Anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits originating in China — Effect to be given to a judgment having found a preceding regulation to be invalid — Reopening of the initial investigation to determine the normal value — Reimposition of the anti-dumping duty on the basis of the same data — Investigation period to be taken into account.#Joined Cases C-283/14 and C-284/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0010decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2015.#J.B.G.T. Miljoen and Others v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#References for a preliminary ruling — Direct taxation — Articles 63 TFEU and 65 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Taxation of dividends from portfolios of shares — Withholding tax — Restriction — Final tax burden — Factors for comparing the tax burdens of resident and non-resident taxpayers — Comparability — Taking into account income tax or corporation tax — Conventions for the avoidance of double taxation — Neutralisation of the restriction by means of a convention.#Joined Cases C-10/14, C-14/14 and C-17/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 September 2015

Report· CCCELEX 62014CC0312decided

Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 17 September 2015.#Banif Plus Bank Zrt. v Márton Lantos and Mártonné Lantos.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ráckevei Járásbíróság.#References for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2004/39/EC — Articles 4(1) and 19(4), (5) and (9) — Markets in financial instruments — Concept of ‘investment services and activities’ — Provisions to ensure investor protection — Conduct of business obligations when providing investment services to clients ‐ Obligation to assess the suitability or appropriateness of the service to be provided — Contractual consequences of non-compliance with that obligation — Consumer credit contracts — Foreign currency denominated loan — Advancement and reimbursement of loan in domestic currency — Terms relating to the exchange rate.#Case C-312/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 September 2015

Record· COCELEX 62014CO0548decided

Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2015.#Arnoldo Mondadori Editore SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Application for registration of the word mark GRAZIA — Opposition by the proprietor of the international, Community and national word and figurative marks including the word element ‘GRAZIA’ — Rejection of the opposition — Article 8(1)(b) — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(5) — Reputation.#Case C-548/14 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 September 2015

Report· CCCELEX 62014CC0471decided

Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 10 September 2015.#Seattle Genetics Inc. v Österreichisches Patentamt.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual and industrial property — Proprietary medicinal products — Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 — Article 13(1) — Supplementary protection certificate — Duration — Concept of the ‘date of the first authorisation to place the product on the market in the European Union’ — Whether account is to be taken of the date of the decision granting authorisation or the date on which notification was given of that decision.#Case C-471/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0321decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 September 2015.#Colena AG v Karnevalservice Bastian GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Krefeld.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Cosmetic products — Consumer protection — Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 — Scope — Non-corrective colour contact lenses featuring designs — Statement on the outer packaging describing the product in question as a cosmetic product — Consumer protection.#Case C-321/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 September 2015

Report· CCCELEX 62013CC0617decided

Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 16 July 2015.#Repsol Lubricantes y Especialidades, SA and Others v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 81 EC — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Spanish market for penetration bitumen — Market sharing and price coordination — Notice on immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases (2002) — Final paragraph of point 23(b) — Partial immunity from fines — Evidence of facts previously unknown to the Commission.#Case C-617/13 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2015

Report· CCCELEX 62013CC0603decided

Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 16 July 2015.#Galp Energía España SA and Others v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 81 EC — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Spanish market for penetration bitumen — Market sharing and price coordination — Excessive length of the proceedings before the General Court — Article 261 TFEU — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 31 — Unlimited jurisdiction — Article 264 TFEU — Annulment, in whole or in part, of the Commission’s decision.#Case C-603/13 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0183decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 July 2015.#Radu Florin Salomie and Nicolae Vasile Oltean v Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Cluj.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling) — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 167, 168, 179 and 213 — Reclassification by the national tax authority of a transaction as an economic activity subject to VAT — Principle of legal certainty — Principle of protection of legitimate expectations — National legislation making the exercise of the right of deduction subject to the identification of the trader concerned for VAT purposes and to the filing of a tax return in respect of that tax.#Case C-183/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 July 2015

Report· CCCELEX 62014CC0157decided

Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 9 July 2015.#Société Neptune Distribution v Ministre de l'Économie et des Finances.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 — Directive 2009/54/EC — Articles 11(1) and 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Consumer protection — Nutrition and health claims — Natural mineral waters — Sodium/salt content — Calculation — Sodium chloride (table salt) or total amount of sodium — Freedom of expression and information — Freedom to conduct a business.#Case C-157/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 July 2015

Report· CCCELEX 62014CC0203decided

Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 7 July 2015.#Consorci Sanitari del Maresme v Corporació de Salut del Maresme i la Selva.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Català de Contractes del Sector Públic.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Jurisdiction of the Court — Status of the referring body as a court or tribunal — Independence — Compulsory jurisdiction — Directive 89/665/EEC — Article 2 — Bodies responsible for review procedures — Directive 2004/18/EC — Articles 1(8) and 52 — Public procurement procedures — Meaning of ‘public entity’ — Public authorities — Inclusion.#Case C-203/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 July 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0422decided

Judgment of the Court of Justice (First Chamber) of July 2, 2015. #State Office for Agriculture, Environment and Rural Areas of the State of Schleswig-Holstein against Dr. med. vet. Uta Wree.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Schleswig-Holstein Higher Administrative Court.#Preliminary ruling submission - Agriculture - Common agricultural policy - Single payment scheme - Regulation (EC) No. 73/2009 - Article 34 (2) (a) - Term 'eligible area' - Concept of 'agricultural area' - area forming the renatured cover layer of a disused landfill - use for agricultural purposes - eligibility for aid.#Case C-422/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 July 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0209decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 July 2015.#NLB Leasing d.o.o. v Republika Slovenija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Supply of goods or services — Lease agreement — Return of immovable property that is the subject-matter of a lease agreement to the lessor — Concept of ‘cancellation, refusal or total or partial non-payment’ — Lessor’s right to a reduction of the taxable amount — Double taxation — Separate supplies — Principle of fiscal neutrality.#Case C-209/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 July 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0461decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 July 2015.#Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland e.V. v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — EU action in the field of water policy — Directive 2000/60/EC — Article 4(1) — Environmental objectives relating to surface waters — Deterioration of the status of a body of surface water — Project for the development of a navigable waterway — Obligation of the Member States not to authorise a project that may cause a deterioration of the status of a body of surface water — Decisive criteria for determining whether there is a deterioration of the status of a body of water.#Case C-461/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 July 2015

Record· COCELEX 62014CO0575decided

Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 June 2015.#Evropaïki Dynamiki - Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission.#Appeal — Arbitration clause — Contract relating to European Union financial support for a project in the context of the ‘eContent’ programme — Termination of the contract by the European Commission — Payment of amounts not paid and compensation for loss allegedly suffered by the applicant — Distortion of evidence in the file — Appeal manifestly inadmissible in part and manifestly unfounded as to the remainder — Application to amend the decision of the General Court of the European Union on costs — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-575/14 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 June 2015

Report· CCCELEX 62014CC0276decided

Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 30 June 2015.#Gmina Wrocław v Minister Finansów.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 9(1) — Article 13(1) — Taxable persons — Interpretation of the word ‘independently’ — Municipal body — Economic activities carried out by an organisational entity of a municipality other than as a public authority — Whether such an entity may be regarded as a ‘taxable person’ within the meaning of the provisions of Directive 2006/112 — Articles 4(2) and 5(3) TEU.#Case C-276/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 June 2015

Report· CCCELEX 62014CC0174decided

Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 25 June 2015.#Saudaçor – Sociedade Gestora de Recursos e Equipamentos da Saúde dos Açores SA v Fazenda Pública.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 13(1) — Treatment as a non-taxable person — Concept of ‘body governed by public law’ — Limited company which is responsible for the provision of services in respect of the planning and management of the health service of the Autonomous Region of the Azores — Determination of the detailed arrangements for those services, including their remuneration, in programme agreements concluded between that company and that region.#Case C-174/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 June 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0242decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 June 2015.#Saatgut-Treuhandverwaltungs GmbH v Gerhard und Jürgen Vogel GbR and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Mannheim.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Community plant variety rights — Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 — Derogation provided for in Article 14 – Use by farmers of the product of the harvest for propagating purposes without the holder’s authorisation — Farmers under an obligation to pay equitable remuneration for such use — Period within which that remuneration must be paid in order to be able to benefit from the derogation — Whether it is possible for the holder to have recourse to Article 94 — Infringement.#Case C-242/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 June 2015

Report· CCCELEX 62014CC0010decided

Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 25 June 2015.#J.B.G.T. Miljoen and Others v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#References for a preliminary ruling — Direct taxation — Articles 63 TFEU and 65 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Taxation of dividends from portfolios of shares — Withholding tax — Restriction — Final tax burden — Factors for comparing the tax burdens of resident and non-resident taxpayers — Comparability — Taking into account income tax or corporation tax — Conventions for the avoidance of double taxation — Neutralisation of the restriction by means of a convention.#Joined Cases C-10/14, C-14/14 and C-17/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 June 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62014CJ0207decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 June 2015.#Hotel Sava Rogaška, Gostinstvo, turizem in storitve, d.o.o. v Republika Slovenija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Natural mineral water — Directive 2009/54/EC — Article 8(2) — Annex I — Prohibition on marketing ‘natural mineral water from one and the same spring’ under more than one trade description — Meaning.#Case C-207/14.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 June 2015