Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,701 records in EU

All countriesUnited States · 41,750Ireland · 23,761United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,721France · 4,100Netherlands · 3,841Austria · 3,578European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0090decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 December 2014.#Ferriere Nord SpA v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for concrete reinforcing bars in bars or coils — Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Fixing of prices and payment terms — Limiting or controlling output or sales — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Competence of the Commission — Rights of the defence — Finding of an infringement — Fines — Repeated infringements — Extenuating circumstances — Cooperation — Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T‑90/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 December 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0092decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 December 2014.#Ferriera Valsabbia SpA and Valsabbia Investimenti SpA v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for concrete reinforcing bars in bars or coils — Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Fixing of prices and payment terms — Limiting or controlling output or sales — Misuse of powers — Rights of the defence — Single and continuous infringement — Fines — Fixing of the starting amount — Extenuating circumstances — Duration of the administrative procedure.#Case T‑92/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 December 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0085decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 December 2014.#Alfa Acciai SpA v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for concrete reinforcing bars in bars or coils — Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Fixing of prices and payment terms — Limiting or controlling output or sales — Misuse of powers — Rights of the defence — Single and continuous infringement — Fines — Fixing of the starting amount — Extenuating circumstances — Duration of the administrative procedure.#Case T‑85/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 December 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0083decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 December 2014.#Riva Fire SpA v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for concrete reinforcing bars in bars or coils — Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Fixing of prices and payment terms — Limiting or controlling output or sales — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Competence of the Commission — Legal basis — Consultation of the Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Monopolies — Rights of the defence — Definition of the geographical market — Application of the principle of lex mitior — Infringement of Article 65 CS — Fines — Gravity and duration of the infringement — Extenuating circumstances — Proportionality — Application of the 1996 Leniency Notice.#Case T‑83/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 December 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0070decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 December 2014.#Feralpi Holding SpA v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for concrete reinforcing bars in bars or coils — Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Fixing of prices and payment terms — Limiting or controlling output or sales — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Lack of competence — Legal basis — Infringement of the rights of the defence — Principles of sound administration, proportionality and equality of arms — Criteria for attributing liability — Definition of the market — Infringement of Article 65 CS — Fines — Limitation period — Gravity — Duration.#Case T‑70/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 December 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0091decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber), 9 December 2014.#Lucchini SpA v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for concrete reinforcing bars in bars or coils — Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Fixing of prices and payment terms — Limiting or controlling output or sales — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Legal basis — Rights of the defence — Fines — Gravity and duration of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Taking account of an annulment judgment in a related case.#Case T‑91/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 December 2014

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-8-2014-010206answered

Defence of Kobani

European Union · European Parliament · 4 December 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0272decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber), 26 November 2014.#Energetický a průmyslový holding a.s. and EP Investment Advisors s.r.o. v European Commission.#Competition — Administrative procedure — Decision finding a refusal to submit to an inspection and imposing a fine — Article 23(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Presumption of innocence — Rights of the defence — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T‑272/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 November 2014

Record· FJCELEX 62013FJ0078decided

Judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber), 13 November 2014.#Stéphane De Loecker v European External Action Service (EEAS).#Civil service — EEAS staff — Temporary staff — Head of delegation in a third country — Early cessation of the functions of head of delegation — Transfer to EEAS headquarters — Rights of the defence — Interests of the service — Statement of reasons.#Case F‑78/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0567decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2014.#Kaatsu Japan Co. Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark KAATSU — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Rights of the defence — Article 75, second sentence, of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T‑567/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 November 2014

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0166decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber), 5 November 2014.#Sophie Mukarubega v Préfet de police and Préfet de la Seine-Saint-Denis.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal administratif de Melun.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Visas, asylum, immigration and other policies related to free movement of persons — Directive 2008/115/EC — Return of illegally staying third-country nationals — Procedure for the adoption of a return decision — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Right of an illegally staying third-country national to be heard before the adoption of a decision liable to affect her interests — Administrative authority refusing to grant such a national a resident permit as an asylum applicant and imposing an obligation to leave the territory — Right to be heard before the return decision is issued.#Case C‑166/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 November 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0307decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition), 5 November 2014.#Adib Mayaleh v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds — Functions of the Governor of the Central Bank of Syria — Actions for annulment — Communication of an act imposing restrictive measures — Time-limit for bringing proceedings — Admissibility — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to private and family life — Application of restrictions on entry to a national of a Member State — Freedom of movement for citizens of the Union.#Joined Cases T‑307/12 and T‑408/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 November 2014

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0437decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber), 23 October 2014.#Unitrading Ltd v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Community Customs Code — Recovery of import duties — Origin of goods — Means of proof — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Procedural autonomy of the Member States.#Case C‑437/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 October 2014

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0467decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 October 2014.#Industries Chimiques du Fluor SA (ICF) v European Commission.#Appeals — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — World market in aluminium fluoride — Rights of the defence — Content of the statement of objections — Calculation of the amount of the fine — 2006 Guidelines for the calculation of fines — Point 18 — Total value of sales of goods or services in relation to the infringement — Obligation to state reasons — Reasonable time period — Reduction of the amount of the fine.#Case C‑467/13 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 October 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0530decided

Judgment of the General Court (Appeal Chamber) of 8 October 2014.#Moises Bermejo Garde v European Economic and Social Committee (EESC).#Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Psychological harassment — Illegal activities affecting the interests of the European Union — Serious failure to comply with the obligations of officials — Articles 12a and 22a of the Staff Regulations — Denunciation by the appellant — Reassignment following that denunciation — No consultation of OLAF by the immediate superior who received the information — Acts adversely affecting a person — Whether official acted reasonably and honestly — Rights of the defence — Competence of the authority issuing the act.#Case T‑530/12 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 October 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0091decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber), 26 September 2014.#Flying Holding NV and Others v European Commission.#Public service contracts — Tender procedure — Provision of non-scheduled passenger transport services by air and chartered air-taxi service — Rejection of application — Article 94(b) of the Financial Regulation — Rights of the defence — Article 134(5) of the detailed rules for the implementation of the Financial Regulation — Actions for annulment — Letter responding to a request made by the applicants — Act not amenable to review — Award decision — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility — Non-contractual liability.#Joined Cases T‑91/12 and T‑280/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 September 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0196decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 23 September 2014.#Aliaksei Mikhalchanka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Belarus — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Restrictions on the entry into and transit through the European Union — Inclusion and retention of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned — Journalist — Action for annulment — Time-limit for instituting proceedings — Partial inadmissibility — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment.#Joined Cases T‑196/11 and T‑542/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 September 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0646decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 23 September 2014.#Vadzim Ipatau v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Belarus — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Restrictions on the entry into and transit through the European Union — Action for annulment — Time-limit for instituting proceedings — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Error of assessment.#Case T-646/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 September 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0262decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 18 September 2014.#Central Bank of Iran v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Action for annulment — Lis pendens — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence.#Case T‑262/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0443decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber), 11 September 2014.#Gold East Paper (Jiangsu) Co. Ltd and Gold Huasheng Paper (Suzhou Industrial Park) Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union.#Dumping — Imports of coated fine paper originating in China — Status as an undertaking evolving in a market economy — Time-limit for adopting a decision as to that status — Diligent and impartial examination — Rights of the defence — Manifest error of assessment — Principle of sound administration — Burden of proof — Injury — Determination of the profit margin — Definition of the product concerned — Community industry — Causal link.#Case T‑443/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0572decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber), 16 July 2014.#Samir Hassan v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Actions for annulment — Adaptation of claims — Out of time — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Proportionality — Action for damages.#Case T‑572/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0578decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 July 2014.#National Iranian Oil Company v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Action for annulment — Infra-State body — Standing to bring proceedings — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Indication and choice of legal basis — Powers of the Council — Principle of foreseeability of European Union acts — Meaning of providing support to nuclear proliferation — Manifest error of assessment — Rights of the defence and right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property.#Case T‑578/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0329decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2014.#Mazen Al-Tabbaa v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Restrictions on the entry into and transit through the European Union — Rights of defence — Right to an effective judicial remedy — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment.#Joined Cases T‑329/12 and T‑74/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 July 2014

Decision· DCELEX 32014D0537in force

Council Decision 2014/537/CFSP of 3 July 2014 on the signing and conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Central African Republic concerning the detailed arrangements for the transfer to the Central African Republic of persons detained by the European Union military operation (EUFOR RCA) in the course of carrying out its mandate, and concerning the guarantees applicable to such persons

European Union · EUR-Lex · 3 July 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0203decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 July 2014.#Mohamad Nedal Alchaar v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Entry of an individual on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures — Links with the regime — Rights of the defence — Right to a fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy.#Case T‑203/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 July 2014

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0129decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber), 3 July 2014.#Kamino International Logistics BV and Datema Hellmann Worldwide Logistics BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Recovery of a customs debt — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Addressee of the recovery decision not heard by the customs authorities before its adoption, but only during the subsequent objection stage — Infringement of the rights of the defence — Determination of the legal consequences of non-observance of the rights of the defence.#Joined Cases C‑129/13 and C‑130/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 July 2014

Report· CCCELEX 62013CC0166decided

Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet delivered on 25 June 2014.#Sophie Mukarubega v Préfet de police and Préfet de la Seine-Saint-Denis.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal administratif de Melun.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Visas, asylum, immigration and other policies related to free movement of persons — Directive 2008/115/EC — Return of illegally staying third-country nationals — Procedure for the adoption of a return decision — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Right of an illegally staying third-country national to be heard before the adoption of a decision liable to affect her interests — Administrative authority refusing to grant such a national a resident permit as an asylum applicant and imposing an obligation to leave the territory — Right to be heard before the return decision is issued.#Case C‑166/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 June 2014

Report· CCCELEX 62013CC0249decided

Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet delivered on 25 June 2014.#Khaled Boudjlida v Préfet des Pyrénées-Atlantiques.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal administratif de Pau.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Visas, asylum, immigration and other policies related to free movement of persons — Directive 2008/115/EC — Return of illegally staying third-country nationals — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Right of an illegally staying third-country national to be heard before the adoption of a decision liable to affect his interests — Return decision — Right to be heard before the return decision is issued — Extent of that right.#Case C‑249/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 June 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0260decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber), 18 June 2014.#Kingdom of Spain v European Commission.#Fisheries — Conservation of fishery resources — Overfishing by Spain of mackerel in zones VIII c, IX and X and in European Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1 allocated for the year 2010 — Deductions from fishing quotas allocated for the years 2011 to 2015 — Rights of defence — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Equal treatment.#Case T‑260/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2014

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0578decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber), 12 June 2014.#Deltafina SpA v European Commission.#Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Italian market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Immunity from fines — Obligation to cooperate — Rights of the defence — Limits of judicial review — Right to fair legal process — Hearing of witnesses or of parties — Reasonable time — Principle of equal treatment.#Case C‑578/11 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 June 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62009TJ0286decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition), 12 June 2014.#(publication by extracts) Intel Corp. v European Commission.#Competition — Abuse of dominant position — Microprocessors market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 82 EC and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement — Loyalty rebates — ‘Naked’ restrictions — Classification as abuse — As-efficient-competitor analysis — Commission’s international jurisdiction — Obligation on the Commission to investigate — Limits — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration — Overall strategy — Fines — Single and continuous infringement — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines.#Case T‑286/09.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 June 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0067decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 June 2014.#Sina Bank v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Action for annulment — Measures against which no action may be brought — Inadmissibility — Rights of the defence.#Case T‑67/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 June 2014

PreviousPage 34 of 35Next