Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU in 2014

All countriesUnited States · 41,745Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,706France · 4,098Netherlands · 3,840Austria · 3,566European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· TOCELEX 62013TO0407decided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy — Principle of res judicata — Inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Action devoid of legal foundation.#Case T‑407/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 December 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62009TJ0072decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2014.#Pilkington Group Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market in carglass — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Market-sharing agreements and exchanges of commercially sensitive information — Fines — Rights of defence –– Retroactive application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Passive or minor role — Deterrent effect of the fine — Taking into account fines previously imposed — Ceiling of the fine — Exchange rate for the calculation of the ceiling of the fine.#Case T‑72/09.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62008TJ0550decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2014.#Tudapetrol Mineralölerzeugnisse Nils Hansen KG v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Paraffin waxes market — Coordination and price increases — Price fixing — 2006 Guidelines for calculating the amount of fines — Rights of the defence — Proof of the infringement — Limitation.#Case T‑550/08.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0269decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 December 2014.#Xeda International SA v European Commission.#Plant protection products — Active substance ethoxyquin — Non-inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC — Withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance — Regulation (EC) No 2229/2004 — Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 — Accelerated assessment procedure — Manifest error of assessment — Rights of the defence — Proportionality — Legitimate expectations.#Case T‑269/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62008TJ0544decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2014.#Hansen & Rosenthal KG and H&R Wax Company Vertrieb GmbH v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Paraffin waxes market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price fixing — Proof of the infringement — 2006 Guidelines for calculating the amount of fines — Rights of the defence — Calculation of the value of sales — Gravity of the infringement — No retroactivity — Equal treatment — Proportionality.#Case T‑544/08.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0643decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber), 12 December 2014 (publication by extracts).#Crown Equipment (Suzhou) Co. Ltd and Crown Gabelstapler GmbH & Co. KG v Council of the European Union.#Dumping — Imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in China — Review — Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Rights of defence — Error of fact — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T‑643/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2014

Report· CCCELEX 62013CC0286decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 11 December 2014.#Dole Food Company, Inc. and Dole Fresh Fruit Europe v European Commission.#Appeals — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European banana market — Coordination in the setting of quotation prices — Obligation to state reasons — Belated statement of reasons — Belated submission of evidence — Rights of defence — Principle of equality of arms — Principles governing the establishment of the facts — Distortion of the facts — Assessment of the evidence — Market structure — Requirement for the Commission to specify those aspects of the exchange of information which constitute a restriction of competition by object — Burden of proof — Calculation of the fine — Whether sales made by subsidiaries not involved in the infringement are to be taken into account — Sales of the same bananas counted twice.#Case C-286/13 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 December 2014

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0249decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber), 11 December 2014.#Khaled Boudjlida v Préfet des Pyrénées-Atlantiques.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal administratif de Pau.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Visas, asylum, immigration and other policies related to free movement of persons — Directive 2008/115/EC — Return of illegally staying third-country nationals — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Right of an illegally staying third-country national to be heard before the adoption of a decision liable to affect his interests — Return decision — Right to be heard before the return decision is issued — Extent of that right.#Case C‑249/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 December 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0090decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 December 2014.#Ferriere Nord SpA v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for concrete reinforcing bars in bars or coils — Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Fixing of prices and payment terms — Limiting or controlling output or sales — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Competence of the Commission — Rights of the defence — Finding of an infringement — Fines — Repeated infringements — Extenuating circumstances — Cooperation — Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T‑90/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 December 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0092decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 December 2014.#Ferriera Valsabbia SpA and Valsabbia Investimenti SpA v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for concrete reinforcing bars in bars or coils — Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Fixing of prices and payment terms — Limiting or controlling output or sales — Misuse of powers — Rights of the defence — Single and continuous infringement — Fines — Fixing of the starting amount — Extenuating circumstances — Duration of the administrative procedure.#Case T‑92/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 December 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0085decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 December 2014.#Alfa Acciai SpA v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for concrete reinforcing bars in bars or coils — Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Fixing of prices and payment terms — Limiting or controlling output or sales — Misuse of powers — Rights of the defence — Single and continuous infringement — Fines — Fixing of the starting amount — Extenuating circumstances — Duration of the administrative procedure.#Case T‑85/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 December 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0083decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 December 2014.#Riva Fire SpA v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for concrete reinforcing bars in bars or coils — Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Fixing of prices and payment terms — Limiting or controlling output or sales — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Competence of the Commission — Legal basis — Consultation of the Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Monopolies — Rights of the defence — Definition of the geographical market — Application of the principle of lex mitior — Infringement of Article 65 CS — Fines — Gravity and duration of the infringement — Extenuating circumstances — Proportionality — Application of the 1996 Leniency Notice.#Case T‑83/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 December 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0070decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 December 2014.#Feralpi Holding SpA v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for concrete reinforcing bars in bars or coils — Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Fixing of prices and payment terms — Limiting or controlling output or sales — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Lack of competence — Legal basis — Infringement of the rights of the defence — Principles of sound administration, proportionality and equality of arms — Criteria for attributing liability — Definition of the market — Infringement of Article 65 CS — Fines — Limitation period — Gravity — Duration.#Case T‑70/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 December 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0091decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber), 9 December 2014.#Lucchini SpA v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for concrete reinforcing bars in bars or coils — Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Fixing of prices and payment terms — Limiting or controlling output or sales — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Legal basis — Rights of the defence — Fines — Gravity and duration of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Taking account of an annulment judgment in a related case.#Case T‑91/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 December 2014

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-8-2014-010206answered

Defence of Kobani

European Union · European Parliament · 4 December 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0272decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber), 26 November 2014.#Energetický a průmyslový holding a.s. and EP Investment Advisors s.r.o. v European Commission.#Competition — Administrative procedure — Decision finding a refusal to submit to an inspection and imposing a fine — Article 23(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Presumption of innocence — Rights of the defence — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T‑272/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 November 2014

Record· FJCELEX 62013FJ0078decided

Judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber), 13 November 2014.#Stéphane De Loecker v European External Action Service (EEAS).#Civil service — EEAS staff — Temporary staff — Head of delegation in a third country — Early cessation of the functions of head of delegation — Transfer to EEAS headquarters — Rights of the defence — Interests of the service — Statement of reasons.#Case F‑78/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0567decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2014.#Kaatsu Japan Co. Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark KAATSU — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Rights of the defence — Article 75, second sentence, of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T‑567/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 November 2014

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0166decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber), 5 November 2014.#Sophie Mukarubega v Préfet de police and Préfet de la Seine-Saint-Denis.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal administratif de Melun.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Visas, asylum, immigration and other policies related to free movement of persons — Directive 2008/115/EC — Return of illegally staying third-country nationals — Procedure for the adoption of a return decision — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Right of an illegally staying third-country national to be heard before the adoption of a decision liable to affect her interests — Administrative authority refusing to grant such a national a resident permit as an asylum applicant and imposing an obligation to leave the territory — Right to be heard before the return decision is issued.#Case C‑166/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 November 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0307decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition), 5 November 2014.#Adib Mayaleh v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds — Functions of the Governor of the Central Bank of Syria — Actions for annulment — Communication of an act imposing restrictive measures — Time-limit for bringing proceedings — Admissibility — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to private and family life — Application of restrictions on entry to a national of a Member State — Freedom of movement for citizens of the Union.#Joined Cases T‑307/12 and T‑408/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 November 2014

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0437decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber), 23 October 2014.#Unitrading Ltd v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Community Customs Code — Recovery of import duties — Origin of goods — Means of proof — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Procedural autonomy of the Member States.#Case C‑437/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 October 2014

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0467decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 October 2014.#Industries Chimiques du Fluor SA (ICF) v European Commission.#Appeals — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — World market in aluminium fluoride — Rights of the defence — Content of the statement of objections — Calculation of the amount of the fine — 2006 Guidelines for the calculation of fines — Point 18 — Total value of sales of goods or services in relation to the infringement — Obligation to state reasons — Reasonable time period — Reduction of the amount of the fine.#Case C‑467/13 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 October 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0530decided

Judgment of the General Court (Appeal Chamber) of 8 October 2014.#Moises Bermejo Garde v European Economic and Social Committee (EESC).#Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Psychological harassment — Illegal activities affecting the interests of the European Union — Serious failure to comply with the obligations of officials — Articles 12a and 22a of the Staff Regulations — Denunciation by the appellant — Reassignment following that denunciation — No consultation of OLAF by the immediate superior who received the information — Acts adversely affecting a person — Whether official acted reasonably and honestly — Rights of the defence — Competence of the authority issuing the act.#Case T‑530/12 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 October 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0091decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber), 26 September 2014.#Flying Holding NV and Others v European Commission.#Public service contracts — Tender procedure — Provision of non-scheduled passenger transport services by air and chartered air-taxi service — Rejection of application — Article 94(b) of the Financial Regulation — Rights of the defence — Article 134(5) of the detailed rules for the implementation of the Financial Regulation — Actions for annulment — Letter responding to a request made by the applicants — Act not amenable to review — Award decision — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility — Non-contractual liability.#Joined Cases T‑91/12 and T‑280/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 September 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0196decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 23 September 2014.#Aliaksei Mikhalchanka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Belarus — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Restrictions on the entry into and transit through the European Union — Inclusion and retention of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned — Journalist — Action for annulment — Time-limit for instituting proceedings — Partial inadmissibility — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment.#Joined Cases T‑196/11 and T‑542/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 September 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0646decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 23 September 2014.#Vadzim Ipatau v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Belarus — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Restrictions on the entry into and transit through the European Union — Action for annulment — Time-limit for instituting proceedings — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Error of assessment.#Case T-646/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 September 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0262decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 18 September 2014.#Central Bank of Iran v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Action for annulment — Lis pendens — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence.#Case T‑262/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0443decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber), 11 September 2014.#Gold East Paper (Jiangsu) Co. Ltd and Gold Huasheng Paper (Suzhou Industrial Park) Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union.#Dumping — Imports of coated fine paper originating in China — Status as an undertaking evolving in a market economy — Time-limit for adopting a decision as to that status — Diligent and impartial examination — Rights of the defence — Manifest error of assessment — Principle of sound administration — Burden of proof — Injury — Determination of the profit margin — Definition of the product concerned — Community industry — Causal link.#Case T‑443/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0572decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber), 16 July 2014.#Samir Hassan v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Actions for annulment — Adaptation of claims — Out of time — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Proportionality — Action for damages.#Case T‑572/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0578decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 July 2014.#National Iranian Oil Company v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Action for annulment — Infra-State body — Standing to bring proceedings — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Indication and choice of legal basis — Powers of the Council — Principle of foreseeability of European Union acts — Meaning of providing support to nuclear proliferation — Manifest error of assessment — Rights of the defence and right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property.#Case T‑578/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2014

Page 1 of 2Next