PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

other · European Union

957a16f7-c757-11ea-adf7-01aa75ed71a1

957a16f7-c757-11ea-adf7-01aa75ed71a1

Members

  • No memberships ingested for this organization yet.

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0907decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 June 2026.#Egenergy Srl en liquidation, anciennement Orefice Generators Srl v MZ and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Collective redundancies – Directive 98/59/EC – Concept of ‘redundancies’ – Article 1(1) – Transfer of place of work – Termination of employment contract due to worker’s refusal to comply with decision to transfer place of work – Procedure of information and consultation of workers’ representatives.#Case C-907/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0095decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#ATAU v Procura generale presso la Corte d’appello di Napoli.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant – Surrender procedure between Member States – Optional grounds for non-execution – Article 4(6) – Undertaking by the executing Member State to execute the sentence in accordance with its domestic law – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty – Grounds for non-recognition and non-enforcement – Article 9(1)(i) – Person concerned who did not appear in person at the trial resulting in his or her conviction – Information regarding the scheduled date of the hearing and place of that trial – Voluntary and unequivocal waiver by the person concerned of the right to appear in person at that trial – Assessment by the competent authority of the executing Member State – Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law.#Case C-95/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 May 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0684decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#Across Fiduciaria SpA and Others v Presidenza del Consiglio dei ministri and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing – Directive (EU) 2015/849 – Article 31 – Concept of legal arrangements having ‘a structure or functions similar to trusts’ – Trust mandates concluded by Italian trust companies (mandato fiduciario) – Access by persons with a legitimate interest to beneficial ownership information – Validity – Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Respect for private and family life – Protection of personal data – Principle of legal certainty – Concept of ‘legitimate interest’ – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Interim legal protection.#Joined Cases C-684/24 and C-685/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 May 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0447decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin v SO.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty – Grounds for non-recognition and non-enforcement – Article 9(1)(i) – Person concerned who did not appear in person at the trial resulting in his or her conviction – Exceptions – Mandate conferred by the person concerned on a legal counsellor to defend that person at his or her trial and accept service of documents addressed to that person – Information regarding the scheduled date of the hearing and place of that trial – Voluntary and unequivocal waiver by the person concerned of the right to appear in person at that trial – Discretion of the competent authority of the executing Member State – Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law.#Case C-447/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 May 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0446decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#Freie Hansestadt Bremen v DT.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Freie Hansestadt Bremen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 11(2) – Entry ban – Duration – National legislation which requires, in principle, an indefinite ban on entry and stay in certain cases – Terrorist threat.#Case C-446/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 April 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0549decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 April 2026.#American Express Europe SA and Others v International Card Services BV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Payment services in the internal market – Regulation (EU) 2015/751 – Article 2(10) – Interchange fees for card-based payment transactions – Article 2(11) – Net compensation – Article 4 – Cap on the amount of those fees – Article 5 – Prohibition of circumvention – Remuneration received by a co-branding partner from a three party payment card scheme – Application of that cap to that remuneration – Deduction of the value of the services provided by the co-branding partner.#Case C-549/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 April 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0357decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#Freistaat Bayern v Euroherc osiguranje d.d.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Coordination of social security systems – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 1(q)(iv) – Concept of ‘competent institution’ – Employer – Article 3(1)(a) – Concept of ‘sickness benefits’ – Continued remuneration in respect of temporary incapacity for work – Article 85(1) – Benefits payable under the legislation of a Member State for injury sustained in the territory of another Member State – Employer’s right of action against a liable third party – Rights of the injured party – Subrogation – Limits.#Case C-357/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0008decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 March 2026.#Criminal proceedings against D. d.o.o.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Regulation (EU) 2018/1805 – Article 1(1) and (4) – Confiscation order issued in criminal proceedings – Point 2 of Article 2 and point 3(a) and (d) of Article 2 – Confiscation in relation to a criminal offence, but without a final conviction – Confiscation order imposed in a judgment of acquittal finding that the goods to be confiscated are the product of a criminal offence other than the offence giving rise to that judgment and in which offence persons other than the defendants acquitted were involved – No indictment against those persons – Article 19(1)(h) – Grounds for non-recognition and non-execution of confiscation orders – Exceptional situations in which there are substantial grounds to believe, on the basis of specific and objective evidence, that the execution of the confiscation order would, in the particular circumstances of the case, entail a manifest breach of a fundamental right as set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to an effective remedy and rights of the defence – No use of effective remedies in the issuing Member State.#Case C-8/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0465decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#SBK Art Limited Liability Company v Fortenova Group STAK Stichting and Open Pass Limited.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Concept of ‘freezing of funds’ – Article 1(f) – Exercise by a person subject to restrictive measures of the rights, attached to depositary receipts, to attend, and vote in, a meeting of holders of such instruments.#Case C-465/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0151decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) v V. M.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/98/EU – Rights for third-country workers who hold a single permit – Article 12 – Right to equal treatment – Third-country national – Residence permit for family reasons – Social security – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Coordination of social security systems – Article 3 – Concept of ‘branches of social security’ – Article 70 – Special non-contributory cash benefits – Social allowance for the elderly living in indigence – Conditions for granting – Exclusion of third-country nationals who do not hold an EU residence permit for long-term residents.#Case C-151/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0056decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Criminal proceedings against MA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Principle of the primacy of EU law – National law alleged to be incompatible with the national Constitution and with EU law – Conditions for referring a matter to a constitutional court – Reasoned assessment of the consequences of the application of EU law – Prior reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling – Article 94(b) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Determination of the national law applicable to the dispute – Content of the request for a preliminary ruling – Obligation or entitlement to refer a matter to a constitutional court before making a reference to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling – None.#Case C-56/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0634decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#M.P. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border checks, asylum and immigration – Crossing of external borders of the Member States – Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 – National legislation requiring a national of several third countries who has benefitted from a visa-free regime to present an additional document in order to obtain a temporary residence permit – Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union, of the other part – Direct effect.#Case C-634/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0864decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#GT and Others v Valora Effekten Handel AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2004/109/EC – Harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market established or operating in a Member State – Notification of the acquisition of major holdings in companies – Acquisition of such holdings by persons acting in concert – Article 3(1a), fourth subparagraph – Concept of ‘more stringent’ requirements – Laws, regulations or administrative provisions adopted in relation to takeover bids, merger transactions and other transactions affecting the ownership or control of companies.#Case C-864/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0718decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#NP v Predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Article 33 – Grounds of inadmissibility – Article 38 – Concept of ‘safe third country’ – Conditions for implementation – Connection between the applicant and the third country concerned – Criteria – Assessment methods – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-718/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0431decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#W v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Roermond.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Article 23(1) – Access to the information in the file of an applicant for international protection – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 4, Article 18 and Article 19(2) – Principle of non-refoulement – Second paragraph of Article 47 – Right to a fair trial – Investigation in the applicant’s country of origin – Rejection of an application for international protection and adoption of a return decision – Access of the court of first instance and the applicant to information relating to the manner in which the investigation was conducted in the applicant’s country of origin – Scope of the rights of the defence and of the right to an effective remedy – Connection with the principle of non-refoulement.#Case C-431/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0654decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#M.M. v Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Allowance granted in the form of an electronic card to support the in-service training of teachers and enhance their professional skills – Grant reserved to teachers employed on a permanent basis – Discrimination against teachers employed on a fixed-term basis – National case-law precluding the retrospective grant of the benefit in question to the teachers concerned where they are no longer employed in the school system – Substitution, under certain conditions, of a right to compensation for the harm suffered.#Case C-654/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0453decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 January 2026.#Criminal proceedings against BC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA – Mutual recognition of financial penalties – Article 7(2)(g) – Ground for non-recognition and non-execution – Informing the person concerned of his or her right to contest the case and of the time limits of such a legal remedy – Article 7(3) – Obligation to consult the competent authority of the issuing Member State.#Case C-453/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0742decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#International Protection Appeals Tribunal and Others v L.K.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Article 15(1) – Access to the labour market as an applicant for international protection – Refusal of a request to access the labour market – Reason for the refusal – Delay in the processing of the application for international protection attributable in part to the applicant.#Case C-742/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0641decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#YM v Openbaar Ministerie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of conducting a criminal prosecution – Article 2(4) – Condition of double criminality – Article 4(1) – Ground for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Article 5(3) – Surrender of the person concerned subject to a guarantee of that person’s return to the executing Member State in order to serve there a custodial sentence or detention order passed in the issuing Member State – Objectives – Social rehabilitation – Combating impunity – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters for the purpose of their enforcement in another Member State – Article 7(3) and (4) – Article 9(1)(d) – Ground for non-recognition of the judgment and non-enforcement of the sentence due to the absence of double criminality – Article 25 – Enforcement of sentences following a European arrest warrant.#Case C-641/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0184decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#AF, en son nom propre et en qualité de personne exerçant la responsabilité parentale sur l’enfant mineur BF v Ministero dell’Interno - U.T.G. - Prefettura di Milano.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Applicants for international protection – Article 7 – Place of residence – Article 18 – Material reception conditions – Housing – Accommodation centres – Transfer – Applicant’s refusal – Article 20(1)(a) – Reduction of material reception conditions or withdrawal of that benefit in exceptional and duly justified cases – Abandonment of the place of residence without informing the competent authority or without permission – Article 20(4) – Serious breaches of the rules of the accommodation centre – Article 20(5) – Proportionality – Dignified standard of living – Article 21 – Applicants falling within the category of vulnerable persons – Article 23 – Minors – Power of a Member State to withdraw material reception conditions if the applicant refuses to be transferred to another accommodation centre.#Case C-184/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0560decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#H (ved DRC Dansk Flygtningehjælp) v Udlændingestyrelsen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Flygtningenævnet København.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Determination of the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Article 29(1) – Transfer time limit – Determination of the starting point of the six-month time limit – Bringing of an appeal with suspensive effect – New circumstance brought to the attention of the judicial authority before which that appeal was brought – Annulment of the initial transfer decision and remittal of the case to the competent administrative authority – Adoption of a second transfer decision which is also the subject of an action for annulment – Consequences for the calculation of the transfer time limit.#Case C-560/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Report· CCCELEX 62024CC0684decided

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 11 December 2025.#Across Fiduciaria SpA and Others v Presidenza del Consiglio dei ministri and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing – Directive (EU) 2015/849 – Article 31 – Concept of legal arrangements having ‘a structure or functions similar to trusts’ – Trust mandates concluded by Italian trust companies (mandato fiduciario) – Access by persons with a legitimate interest to beneficial ownership information – Validity – Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Respect for private and family life – Protection of personal data – Principle of legal certainty – Concept of ‘legitimate interest’ – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Interim legal protection.#Joined Cases C-684/24 and C-685/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 December 2025