Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Transport

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU in 2012

All countriesIreland · 74,985United States · 19,023Austria · 8,877France · 7,984Netherlands · 6,595United Kingdom · 5,168European Union · 3,736Germany · 2,171Belgium · 59Estonia · 15Search this topic

Records

Report· CCCELEX 62010CC0512decided

Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 13 December 2012.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Transport — Directive 91/440/EEC — Development of the Community’s railways — Directive 2001/14/EC — Allocation of railway infrastructure capacity — Article 6(2) and (3) of Directive 2001/14 — Continued absence of financial balance — Articles 6(1) and 7(3) and (4) of Directive 91/440 — Absence of incentives for infrastructure managers — Articles 7(3) and 8(1) of Directive 2001/14 — Calculation of the minimum access charge.#Case C‑512/10.#European Commission v Czech Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Transport — Directive 91/440/EEC — Development of the Community’s railways — Article 10(7) — Regulatory body — Competences — Directive 2001/14/EC — Allocation of railway infrastructure capacity — Article 4(1) — Charging framework — Article 6(2) — Measures intended to provide the infrastructure manager with incentives to reduce the costs of provision of infrastructure and the level of access charges — Article 7(3) — Setting charges for the minimum access package and track access to service facilities — Cost directly incurred as a result of operating the railway service — Article 11 — Performance scheme — Article 30(5) — Regulatory body — Competences — Administrative appeal against the decisions of the regulatory body.#Case C‑545/10.#European Commission v French Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Transport — Development of the Community’s railways — Directive 91/440/EEC — Article 6(3) and Annex II — Directive 2001/14/EC — Article 14(2) — Lack of legal independence of the railway infrastructure manager — Article 11 — Absence of a performance scheme — Incomplete transposition.#Case C‑625/10.#European Commission v Republic of Slovenia.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Transport — Directive 91/440/EEC — Development of the Community’s railways — Directive 2001/14/EC — Allocation of railway infrastructure capacity — Article 6(3) and Annex II to Directive 91/440 — Article 14(2) of Directive 2001/14 — Infrastructure manager — Participation in the preparation of the service timetable — Traffic management — Article 6(2) to (5) of Directive 2001/14 — Failure to provide incentives for infrastructure managers to reduce the costs of provision of infrastructure and the level of access charges — Articles 7(3) and 8(1) of Directive 2001/14 — Cost that is directly incurred as a result of operating the train service — Article 11 of Directive 2001/14 — Performance scheme.#Case C‑627/10.#European Commission v Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Transport — Development of the Community’s railways — Directive 91/440/EEC — Article 6(3) and Annex II — Directive 2001/14/EC — Article 14(2) — Independence of the body to which the exercise of essential functions is entrusted.#Case C‑412/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 December 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62010CC0625decided

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 13 December 2012. # European Commission v French Republic. # Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Transport - Development of the Community’s railways - Directive 91/440/EEC - Article 6(3) and Annex II - Directive 2001/14/EC - Article 14(2) - Lack of legal independence of the railway infrastructure manager - Article 11 - Absence of a performance scheme - Incomplete transposition. # Case C-625/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 December 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62010CC0627decided

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 13 December 2012. # European Commission v Republic of Slovenia. # Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Transport - Directive 91/440/EEC - Development of the Community’s railways - Directive 2001/14/EC - Allocation of railway infrastructure capacity - Article 6(3) and Annex II to Directive 91/440 - Article 14(2) of Directive 2001/14 - Infrastructure manager - Participation in the preparation of the service timetable - Traffic management - Article 6(2) to (5) of Directive 2001/14 - Failure to provide incentives for infrastructure managers to reduce the costs of provision of infrastructure and the level of access charges - Articles 7(3) and 8(1) of Directive 2001/14 - Cost that is directly incurred as a result of operating the train service - Article 11 of Directive 2001/14 - Performance scheme. # Case C-627/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 December 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62011CC0412decided

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 13 December 2012. # European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxemburg. # Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Transport - Development of the Community’s railways - Directive 91/440/EEC - Article 6(3) and Annex II - Directive 2001/14/EC - Article 14(2) - Independence of the body to which the exercise of essential functions is entrusted. # Case C-412/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 December 2012

Record· COCELEX 62012CO0318decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 November 2012.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Conseil régional d'expression française de l’ordre des médecins vétérinaires (Belgium) — Interpretation of Articles 3 and 8 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 of 22 December 2004 on the protection of animals during transport and related operations and amending Directives 64/432/EEC and 93/119/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 (OJ 2005 L 3, p. 1) — Question referred for a preliminary ruling by a professional association — Concept of court within the meaning of Article 267 TFEU — Jurisdiction of the Court — Insufficient as to facts and law — Admissibility of the question.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Failure to set out the factual and legal context of the main proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C‑318/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 November 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0410decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 22 November 2012.#Pedro Espada Sánchez and Others v Iberia Líneas Aéreas de España SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona.#Air transport — Montreal Convention — Article 22(2) — Liability of carriers in respect of baggage — Limits of liability in the event of the destruction, loss, damage or delay of baggage — Shared baggage belonging to a number of passengers — Baggage checked in by one of those passengers.#Case C‑410/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 November 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0136decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber), 22 November 2012.#Westbahn Management GmbH v ÖBB-Infrastruktur AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Schienen-Control Kommission.#Transport — Rail transport — Obligation of the railway infrastructure manager to provide railway undertakings in real time with all information concerning train movements, in particular information on delays to connecting trains.#Case C‑136/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 November 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62010CJ0528decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 November 2012.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Transport — Development of the Community’s railways — Directive 2001/14/EC — Articles 6(2) to (5) and 11 — Railway infrastructure capacity and charges levied for the use of railway infrastructure — Regulatory body — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period.#Case C‑528/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 November 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0271decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber), 8 November 2012.#Techniko Epimelitirio Elladas (TEE) and Others v Ipourgos Esoterikon, Dimosias Diikisis kai Apokentrosis and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias.#Air transport – Regulation No 2042/2003 – Technical requirements and administrative procedures in the field of civil aviation – Continuing airworthiness of aircraft – Approval of members of staff involved in tasks of inspection – Qualifications required.#Case C‑271/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 November 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0557decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber), 25 October 2012.#Maria Kozak v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Lublinie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#VAT – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 306 to 310 – Special scheme for travel agents – Transport services carried out by travel agents acting in their own name – Concept of single service – Article 98 – Reduced VAT rate.#Case C‑557/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 October 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62010CJ0557decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber), 25 October 2012.#European Commission v Portuguese Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Transport – Development of the Community’s railways – Directive 91/440/EEC – Article 5(3) – Rail transport undertakings – Freedom of management – Decisions on staff, assets and own procurement – Article 7(3) – Grant of financing to the infrastructure manager – Directive 2001/14/EC – Article 6(1) – Balancing the accounts – Appropriate conditions – Incomplete transposition.#Case C‑557/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 October 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62010CJ0581decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 23 October 2012.#Emeka Nelson and Others v Deutsche Lufthansa AG and TUI Travel plc and Others v Civil Aviation Authority.#References for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln (Germany) and the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court).#Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Articles 5 to 7 – Montreal Convention – Articles 19 and 29 – Right to compensation in the event of delay of flights – Compatibility.#Joined Cases C‑581/10 and C‑629/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 October 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0321decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 4 October 2012.#Germán Rodríguez Cachafeiro and María de los Reyes Martínez-Reboredo Varela-Villamor v Iberia, Líneas Aéreas de España SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 2 de A Coruña.#Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Compensation for passengers in the event of denied boarding — Concept of ‘denied boarding’ — Cancellation of a passenger’s boarding card by an air carrier because of the anticipated delay to an earlier flight also operated by it which included check-in for the flight concerned.#Case C‑321/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0022decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 4 October 2012.#Finnair Oyj v Timy Lassooy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus.#Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Compensation for passengers in the event of denied boarding — Concept of ‘denied boarding’ — Exclusion from characterisation as ‘denied boarding’ — Cancellation of a flight caused by a strike at the airport of departure — Rescheduling of flights after the cancelled flight — Right to compensation of the passengers on those flights.#Case C–22/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2012

Record· TJCELEX 62006TJ0353decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2012.#Vermeer Infrastructuur BV v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Existence and classification of an agreement — Restriction of competition — Guidelines on the applicability of Article 81 EC to horizontal cooperation agreements — Calculation of the amount of the fines — Gravity and duration of the infringement — Duty to state reasons — Rights of the defence.#Case T‑353/06.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2012

Record· TJCELEX 62006TJ0359decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2012.#Heijmans Infrastructuur BV v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Burden of proof — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Duty to state reasons — Rights of the defence.#Case T‑359/06.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 September 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62010CC0547decided

Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 13 September 2012.#Swiss Confederation v European Commission.#Appeal — External relations — Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on air transport — Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 — Access of Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes — Articles 8 and 9 — Scope — Exercise of traffic rights — Decision 2004/12/EC — German measures relating to the approaches to Zurich Airport — Duty to state reasons — Non-discrimination — Proportionality — Burden of proof.#Case C‑547/10 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 September 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62010CC0556decided

Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 6 September 2012.#European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Transport — Development of the Community’s railways — Directive 91/440/EEC — Article 6(3) and Annex II — Directive 2001/14/EC — Articles 4(2) and 14(2) — Infrastructure manager — Organisational and decision-making independence — Holding company structure — Directive 2001/14 — Articles 7(3) and 8(1) — Setting charges on the basis of direct costs — Levying of charges — Direct costs — Total costs — Directive 2001/14 — Article 6(2) — No incentive to reduce costs — Directive 91/440 — Article 10(7) — Directive 2001/14 — Article 30(4) — Regulatory body — Powers.#Case C‑556/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 September 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62010CC0473decided

Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 6 September 2012.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Development of the Community’s railways — Allocation of railway infrastructure capacity — Levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure — Directives 91/440/EEC and 2001/14/EC — Incomplete transposition.#Case C‑473/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 September 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62011CC0075decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 6 September 2012.#European Commission v Republic of Austria.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Citizenship of the Union − Right to move and reside freely − Articles 20 TFEU and 21 TFEU − Discrimination on grounds of nationality − Article 18 TFEU − Directive 2004/38/EC − Article 24 — Derogation − Scope − Member State in which reduced fares on public transport are granted only to students whose parents are in receipt of family allowances in that Member State.#Case C‑75/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 September 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62010CC0555decided

Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 6 September 2012.#European Commission v Republic of Austria.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Transport — Development of the Community’s railways — Directive 91/440/EEC — Article 6(3) and Annex II — Directive 2001/14/EC — Articles 4(2) and 14(2) — Infrastructure manager — Organisational and decision-making independence — Holding company structure — Incomplete transposition.#Case C‑555/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 September 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62010CC0557decided

Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 6 September 2012.#European Commission v Portuguese Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Transport – Development of the Community’s railways – Directive 91/440/EEC – Article 5(3) – Rail transport undertakings – Freedom of management – Decisions on staff, assets and own procurement – Article 7(3) – Grant of financing to the infrastructure manager – Directive 2001/14/EC – Article 6(1) – Balancing the accounts – Appropriate conditions – Incomplete transposition.#Case C‑557/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 September 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0112decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 19 July 2012.#ebookers.com Deutschland GmbH v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Köln.#Transport — Air transport — Common rules for the operation of air services in the European Union — Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 — Obligation on the person selling air travel to ensure that the customer’s acceptance of optional price supplements is on an opt-in basis — Concept of ‘optional price supplements’ — Price of flight cancellation insurance provided by an independent insurance company and forming part of the overall price.#Case C‑112/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 July 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0250decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber), 19 July 2012.#Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB v Vilniaus teritorinė muitinė, Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Mokestinių ginčų komisija prie Lietuvos Respublikos vyriausybės.#Relief from customs duties and VAT exemptions on imports of goods — Fuel contained in the standard tanks of land motor vehicles — Notion of ‘motorised road vehicle’ — Locomotives — Road transport and transport by rail — Principle of equal treatment — Principle of neutrality.#Case C-250/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 July 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0284decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber), 12 July 2012.#EMS-Bulgaria Transport OOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto’ Plovdiv.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#VAT — Directive 2006/112/ EC — Right to deduct — Limitation period for the exercise of the right to deduct VAT — Principle of effectiveness — Refusal of the right to deduct VAT — Principle of fiscal neutrality.#Case C‑284/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 July 2012

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0005decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber), 21 June 2012.#Titus Alexander Jochen Donner.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Free movement of goods — Industrial and commercial property — Sale of copies of works in a Member State in which the copyright on those works is not protected — Transport of those goods to another Member State in which the infringement of the copyright is sanctioned under criminal law — Criminal proceedings against the transporter for aiding and abetting the unlawful distribution of a work protected by copyright law.#Case C-5/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 June 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62011CC0136decided

Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 7 June 2012.#Westbahn Management GmbH v ÖBB-Infrastruktur AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Schienen-Control Kommission.#Transport — Rail transport — Obligation of the railway infrastructure manager to provide railway undertakings in real time with all information concerning train movements, in particular information on delays to connecting trains.#Case C‑136/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 June 2012

Report· CCCELEX 62010CC0581decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 15 May 2012.#Emeka Nelson and Others v Deutsche Lufthansa AG and TUI Travel plc and Others v Civil Aviation Authority.#References for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln (Germany) and the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court).#Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Articles 5 to 7 – Montreal Convention – Articles 19 and 29 – Right to compensation in the event of delay of flights – Compatibility.#Joined Cases C‑581/10 and C‑629/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 May 2012

Page 1 of 2Next