Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Amendment · Amendement

353

Amendement 353 — ART. 6

rejectedFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

10 January 2019

Last action

17 January 2019 · Rejeté

Status

Rejeté

Sponsors

Emmanuelle Anthoine, Thibault Bazin, Valérie Bazin-Malgras, Jean-Yves Bony, Ian Boucard, Fabrice Brun, Jacques Cattin, Julien Dive, Jean-Pierre Door, Marc Le Fur, Sébastien Leclerc, Geneviève Levy, Frédérique Meunier, Jérôme Nury, Raphaël Schellenberger, Éric Straumann, Pierre Vatin, Claude de Ganay, Jean-Louis Masson, Didier Quentin, Valérie Lacroute

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

17 January 2019

Official sourceShare

Summary

Rédiger ainsi la seconde phrase de l’alinéa 9 : « Ce recours est suspensif, le précédent titre ayant alors vocation à s’appliquer jusqu’à la décision du juge aux affaires familiales. »

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 10 January 2019

    Dépôt

    Source: dateDepot

  2. 17 January 2019

    Publication

    Source: datePublication

  3. 17 January 2019

    Rejeté

    Source: dateSort

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.