PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

other

Court of Justice of the European Union

CJ

Members

  • No memberships ingested for this organization yet.

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0209decided

Απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου (πέμπτο τμήμα) της 16ης Ιουλίου 2026.#FT και RRC Sports GmbH κατά Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA).#Προδικαστική παραπομπή – Εσωτερική αγορά – Ανταγωνισμός – Επαγγελματικό ποδόσφαιρο – Κανόνες της Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) σχετικά με τους διαμεσολαβητές – Κανόνες σχετικά με την αμοιβή των διαμεσολαβητών, την άδεια άσκησης επαγγέλματος, την πολλαπλή εκπροσώπηση, τις “προσεγγίσεις”, καθώς και την κοινοποίηση ορισμένων στοιχείων στη FIFA, στους λοιπούς διαμεσολαβητές, στους συλλόγους και στους παίκτες – Άρθρο 101, παράγραφος 1, ΣΛΕΕ – Απαγόρευση των συμπράξεων – Συμφωνίες μεταξύ επιχειρήσεων, αποφάσεις ενώσεων επιχειρήσεων και εναρμονισμένες πρακτικές – Περιορισμοί του ανταγωνισμού – Έννοιες του αντιθέτου προς τον ανταγωνισμό “αντικειμένου” και “αποτελέσματος” – Εξαίρεση από την απαγόρευση του άρθρου 101, παράγραφος 1, ΣΛΕΕ – Προϋποθέσεις – Εξαίρεση βάσει του άρθρου 101, παράγραφος 3, ΣΛΕΕ – Προϋποθέσεις – Έννοια της “βελτίωσης της αποτελεσματικότητας” – Άρθρο 102 ΣΛΕΕ – Κατάχρηση δεσπόζουσας θέσης – Δικαιολόγηση – Προϋποθέσεις – Άρθρο 56 ΣΛΕΕ – Εμπόδιο στην ελεύθερη παροχή υπηρεσιών – Σκοποί – Αναλογικότητα – Προστασία των δεδομένων προσωπικού χαρακτήρα – Κανονισμός (ΕΕ) 2016/679 – Άρθρο 6, παράγραφος 1, πρώτο εδάφιο, στοιχείο στʹ – Νομιμότητα της επεξεργασίας – Προϋποθέσεις.#Υπόθεση C-209/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0424decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#ZD and MI v Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio (FIGC) and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Disciplinary sanctions in the area of sport – Temporary prohibition on the pursuit of certain professional activities, imposed by a national sports association on two directors of a professional football club – Infringement consisting in making or approving false financial and accounting statements – Internal market – Articles 45 and 56 TFEU – Obstacle to the freedom of movement for workers and the freedom to provide services – Whether justified – Legitimate objective in the public interest – Proper conduct of sporting competitions – Observance of the principle of proportionality – Determination of sanctions – Existence of transparent, objective, non-discriminatory, proportionate and verifiable criteria – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective judicial protection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Whether there is effective judicial review – National legislation allowing the court having jurisdiction over the indirect review of the lawfulness of those sanctions to award compensation to the persons subject to sanctions but not to annul or suspend those sanctions.#Joined Cases C-424/24 and C-425/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0196decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#xx v ww and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation between the courts of Member States in civil or commercial matters – Regulation (EU) 2020/1783 – Article 12(2) – Request made to the requested court for the execution of a measure of inquiry adopted by the requesting court – Grounds for refusal to execute such a request – Rule of substantive law of the requested Member State – Taking of the evidence considered to be contrary to the fundamental principles of the law of the requested Member State – Exhumation of a body for the purpose of establishing parentage – Post-mortem genetic testing – Articles 1 and 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for human dignity – Right to know one’s genetic origins.#Case C-196/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0790decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#International Management Group (IMG) v European Commission.#Appeal – EU Financial Regulations – Implementation of the EU budget under joint or indirect management with an international organisation – Decision refusing to recognise an entity as an international organisation with retroactive effect – Concept of ‘international organisation’ – Constituent elements – Interpretation of the international agreement establishing the organisation – Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties – Articles 31 and 32 – Non-contractual liability.#Case C-790/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0096decided

Presuda Suda (četvrto vijeće) od 16. srpnja 2026.#X.Y. i dr.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku – Vladavina prava – Neovisnost sudaca – Članak 19. stavak 1. drugi podstavak UEU-a – Članak 47. Povelje Europske unije o temeljnim pravima – Nacionalni propis na temelju kojeg se može provjeriti poštuje li sudac koji obnaša dužnost na Sądu Najwyższyjem (Vrhovni sud, Poljska) zahtjeve neovisnosti i nepristranosti – Sastav suda od kojeg se traži da provede nadzor poštovanja tih zahtjeva – Nepravilnost uvjeta imenovanja člana takvog sastava – Posljedice koje se mogu izvesti iz te nepravilnosti – Nepristranost – Nadređenost prava Unije.#Spojeni predmeti C-96/24, C-103/24 i C-112/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0559decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#International Management Group (IMG) v European Commission.#Appeal – Non-contractual liability – European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) investigations – Confidentiality – Non-authorised disclosure of the investigation report to the press – Imputability of the leaks – Article 10(3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 – Material and non-material damage – Burden of proof – Limitation period for actions for damages – First paragraph of Article 46 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Confidentiality of legal opinions.#Case C-559/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0523decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Sociedad Civil Catalana, Asociación Cívica y Cultural (SCC) and Ministerio Fiscal v RAS and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the financial interests of the Union – Article 325(1) TFEU – Effective judicial protection in matters covered by EU law – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Accounting liability proceedings – Pursuit of the independence of part of the national territory of a Member State – National amnesty law concerning acts giving rise to liability in respect of public funds – Extinction of liability within a maximum period of two months, without examination of the defence submissions and exculpatory evidence and without hearing all the parties to the proceedings – First paragraph of Article 23 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Stay of the main proceedings by a national court which has submitted a request for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice under Article 267 TFEU.#Case C-523/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0748decided

Rozsudek Soudního dvora (čtvrtého senátu) ze dne 16. července 2026.#C. Limited v. M. S.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Právní stát – Nezávislost soudců – Článek 19 odst. 1 druhý pododstavec SEU – Článek 47 Listiny základních práv Evropské unie – Vnitrostátní právní úprava umožňující ověřit dodržení požadavků na nezávislost a nestrannost soudce působícího u Nejvyššího soudu (Sąd Najwyższy, Polsko) – Složení soudního kolegia pověřeného přezkoumáním dodržení těchto požadavků – Vada podmínek jmenování člena takového kolegia – Důsledky vyplývající z této vady – Nestrannost – Přednost unijního práva.#Věc C-748/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0421decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (AGCOM) v Google Ireland Limited.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2000/31/EC – Article 1(5) – Scope – Exclusion of gambling activities – Advertising of gambling – Hosting such advertising – Article 14 – Liability regime for hosting service providers – Active role – Commercial contract concluded between a hosting service provider and a recipient of the service.#Case C-421/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0666decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Ministerio Fiscal and Others v EGB and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Combating terrorism – Article 83(1) TFEU – Directive (EU) 2017/541 – Article 3 – Terrorist offences – Article 4 – Offences relating to a terrorist group – Article 15(1) – Obligation to provide for effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal penalties – Effectiveness – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Primacy of EU law – Principle of sincere cooperation – National amnesty law which provides for the extinction of criminal liability – Acts which have not intentionally caused serious breaches of human rights.#Case C-666/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0789decided

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#International Management Group (IMG) contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Responsabilité non contractuelle – Réglementation financière de l’Union – Exécution du budget de l’Union européenne en gestion indirecte par une organisation internationale – Décision refusant à une entité la reconnaissance du statut d’organisation internationale – Préjudice matériel – Perte de chance de conclure avec la Commission européenne des conventions de délégation selon le mode de la gestion indirecte en qualité d’organisation internationale et de percevoir une contribution visant à couvrir les frais administratifs induits – Lien de causalité – Réalité et étendue du préjudice.#Affaire C-789/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0027decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#SU and Wild Ireland Defence CLG v An Coimisiún Pleanála, anciennement An Bord Pleanála and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Directive 2009/147/EC – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Special protection areas – Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project likely to have an effect on a protected site in view of that site’s conservation objectives – Screening – Conservation objectives specific to a special protection area not set.#Case C-27/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0051decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Betaal Garant Nederland CV v De Nederlandsche Bank NV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Payment services in the internal market – Directive (EU) 2015/2366 – Article 4(3) – Concept of a ‘payment service’ – Article 4(24) – Concept of ‘credit transfer’ – Transaction by an intermediary entity carried out under a tripartite agreement and consisting in the holding of client funds in a bank account of that intermediary entity and the transfer of those funds to a business owner, following the client’s authorisation – Classification of the transaction – Absence of a ‘payment service’.#Case C-51/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0026decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#PQ v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság Dél-alföldi Regionális Igazgatóság and Alkotmányvédelmi Hivatal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the European Union – Article 20 TFEU – Family member of a Union citizen who has never exercised his or her right of freedom of movement – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Threat to national security – Statement by a specialist national authority – Statement of reasons – Access to the file – Classified information – Primacy of EU law.#Case C-26/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0158decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#QJ v Administration de l'enregistrement, des domaines et de la TVA and État du Grand-duché de Luxembourg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Whether applicable – National legislation providing for a system of joint and several liability of company directors for payment of value added tax (VAT) owed by the company – Binding effect of the findings of fact and legal classifications contained in a final tax assessment – Option for the director to challenge the assessment issued against the company as an incidental question – Respect for the rights of the defence.#Case C-158/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0399decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 1(1) in fine and Article 2(1) in fine – Restrictive measures imposed on a natural person associated with another natural person who is in turn subject to restrictive measures – Definition of ‘association’ in the case of two persons bound by a family relationship – Article 21 TFEU – Article 45(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Citizenship of the Union – Freedom of movement – Restrictive measures affecting the freedom of movement and residence of an EU citizen.#Case C-399/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0400decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 1(1)(b) and Article 2(1)(d) – Restrictive measures taken against a natural person providing financial support to Russian decision-makers responsible for the annexation of Crimea or the destabilisation of Ukraine – Article 21 TFEU – Article 45(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Citizenship of the Union – Freedom of movement – Restrictive measures affecting the freedom of movement and residence of an EU citizen.#Case C-400/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0258decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#IMI – Imagens Médicas Integradas S.A. and Others v Autoridade da Concorrência.#References for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Abuse of a dominant position – Articles 101 and 102 TFEU – Implementation by the national competition authorities – Decision of a national competition authority ordering an inspection – Search of the premises of the undertakings concerned – Seizure of business records resulting from email communications – Warrant issued by the Public Prosecutor’s Office – Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for private life and communications – Right to the protection of personal data – Procedural requirements – No prior authorisation by a court.#Joined Cases C-258/23 to C-260/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0280decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Parchetul de pe lângă Curtea de Apel Oradea v M.G.D.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Article 325(1) TFEU – Convention drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests – Article 2(1) – Obligation to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union by taking effective deterrent measures – Obligation to provide for criminal penalties – Serious fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union – Concept – Limitation period for criminal liability – National standard of protection relating to the principle of the retroactive application of the more lenient criminal law (lex mitior principle) – Obligation for the courts of a Member State to disapply case-law of the supreme court of that Member State which is not in line with EU law – Application of the judgment of 24 July 2023, Lin (C‑107/23 PPU, EU:C:2023:606) – Constitutional prohibition on applying lex tertia – Limitation period already expired – Foreseeability of the conditions laid down by that judgment – Compatibility of that judgment with Article 7 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950.#Case C-280/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0363decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Dana Astra IOOO v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Criterion for inclusion on those lists relating to the benefit derived from or the support provided to the Lukashenko regime – Maintenance of the appellant’s name on those lists – Belarusian company active in the property development and construction sector – Grounds for maintaining the listing – Sixth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Point from which time starts to run – Notification of the restrictive measures at issue to the appellant’s lawyers – Inadmissibility of the action on the ground that it was brought out of time – Examination of the merits of the action for reasons relating to the sound administration of justice – Plea in law alleging errors of assessment vitiating the grounds for maintaining the listing.#Case C-363/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0401decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Elettronica Industriale SpA v Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications networks and services – Directive 2002/21/EC – Article 9 – Radio spectrum management for electronic communications services – Principle of service neutrality – Article 9a – Review of restrictions on existing rights to use radio spectrum – A national measure requiring a holder of rights to use radio frequencies to use those frequencies in accordance with the provisions of the national frequency allocation plan and not permitting the pursuit of different activities – A national measure requiring the use of those radio frequencies exclusively for digital terrestrial television broadcasting services.#Case C-401/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0169decided

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#PV contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Procédure disciplinaire – Révocation – Retrait de la décision de révocation pour vice de procédure – Nouvelle révocation – Composition du Tribunal de l’Union européenne – Prétendue absence d’impartialité – Offres de preuves – Actes frauduleux – Effets du retrait d’une décision – Réintégration du fonctionnaire sans son consentement – Composition de l’autorité investie du pouvoir de nomination – Prétendue absence d’impartialité.#Affaire C-169/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0133decided

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#PV contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Pension d’ancienneté – Conditions d’octroi – Statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne – Article 77 – Durée minimale de service – Absences injustifiées ou irrégulières – Article 59, paragraphe 3 – Article 60 – Imputation des absences irrégulières ou injustifiées sur la durée du congé annuel – Conséquences en cas d’épuisement dudit congé – Perte du bénéfice de la rémunération pour la période correspondant aux absences irrégulières ou injustifiées – Privation de plein droit du bénéfice de l’acquisition de droits à pension d’ancienneté pour la période concernée.#Affaire C-133/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0039decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Bogoljub Karić v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus – Decision 2012/642/CFSP – Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to and transit through the territory of the European Union – Inclusion and maintenance of the appellant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned by the restrictive measures – Criterion relating to benefiting from or supporting the regime of President Lukashenko.#Case C-39/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0196_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#xx v ww and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation between the courts of Member States in civil or commercial matters – Regulation (EU) 2020/1783 – Article 12(2) – Request made to the requested court for the execution of a measure of inquiry adopted by the requesting court – Grounds for refusal to execute such a request – Rule of substantive law of the requested Member State – Taking of the evidence considered to be contrary to the fundamental principles of the law of the requested Member State – Exhumation of a body for the purpose of establishing parentage – Post-mortem genetic testing – Articles 1 and 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for human dignity – Right to know one’s genetic origins.#Case C-196/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0559_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#International Management Group (IMG) v European Commission.#Appeal – Non-contractual liability – European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) investigations – Confidentiality – Non-authorised disclosure of the investigation report to the press – Imputability of the leaks – Article 10(3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 – Material and non-material damage – Burden of proof – Limitation period for actions for damages – First paragraph of Article 46 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Confidentiality of legal opinions.#Case C-559/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0424_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#ZD and MI v Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio (FIGC) and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Disciplinary sanctions in the area of sport – Temporary prohibition on the pursuit of certain professional activities, imposed by a national sports association on two directors of a professional football club – Infringement consisting in making or approving false financial and accounting statements – Internal market – Articles 45 and 56 TFEU – Obstacle to the freedom of movement for workers and the freedom to provide services – Whether justified – Legitimate objective in the public interest – Proper conduct of sporting competitions – Observance of the principle of proportionality – Determination of sanctions – Existence of transparent, objective, non-discriminatory, proportionate and verifiable criteria – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective judicial protection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Whether there is effective judicial review – National legislation allowing the court having jurisdiction over the indirect review of the lawfulness of those sanctions to award compensation to the persons subject to sanctions but not to annul or suspend those sanctions.#Joined Cases C-424/24 and C-425/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0258_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#IMI – Imagens Médicas Integradas S.A. and Others v Autoridade da Concorrência.#References for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Abuse of a dominant position – Articles 101 and 102 TFEU – Implementation by the national competition authorities – Decision of a national competition authority ordering an inspection – Search of the premises of the undertakings concerned – Seizure of business records resulting from email communications – Warrant issued by the Public Prosecutor’s Office – Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for private life and communications – Right to the protection of personal data – Procedural requirements – No prior authorisation by a court.#Joined Cases C-258/23 to C-260/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0748_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#C. Limited v M. S.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Judicial independence – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – National legislation permitting a review of compliance with the requirements of independence and impartiality of a judge sitting in the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Composition of the panel of judges called upon to review compliance with those requirements – Irregularities in the appointment of a member of the panel – Consequences of such irregularities – Impartiality – Primacy of EU law.#Case C-748/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0666_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Criminal proceedings against EGB and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Combating terrorism – Article 83(1) TFEU – Directive (EU) 2017/541 – Article 3 – Terrorist offences – Article 4 – Offences relating to a terrorist group – Article 15(1) – Obligation to provide for effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal penalties – Effectiveness – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Primacy of EU law – Principle of sincere cooperation – National amnesty law which provides for the extinction of criminal liability – Acts which have not intentionally caused serious breaches of human rights.#Case C-666/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0280_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Criminal proceedings against M.G.D.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Article 325(1) TFEU – Convention drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests – Article 2(1) – Obligation to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union by taking effective deterrent measures – Obligation to provide for criminal penalties – Serious fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union – Concept – Limitation period for criminal liability – National standard of protection relating to the principle of the retroactive application of the more lenient criminal law (lex mitior principle) – Obligation for the courts of a Member State to disapply case-law of the supreme court of that Member State which is not in line with EU law – Application of the judgment of 24 July 2023, Lin (C‑107/23 PPU, EU:C:2023:606) – Constitutional prohibition on applying lex tertia – Limitation period already expired – Foreseeability of the conditions laid down by that judgment – Compatibility of that judgment with Article 7 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950.#Case C-280/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0209_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#FT and RRC Sports GmbH v Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market – Competition – Professional football – Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) Football Agent Regulations – Rules on agents’ remuneration, agent licences, multiple representation, making an approach and the communication of certain information to FIFA, other agents, clubs and players – Article 101(1) TFEU – Prohibition of agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices – Restrictions on competition – Concepts of anticompetitive ‘object’ and ‘effect’ – Exception to the prohibition laid down in Article 101(1) TFEU – Conditions – Exemption under Article 101(3) TFEU – Conditions – Concept of ‘efficiency gains’ – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Justification – Conditions – Article 56 TFEU – Obstacle to the freedom to provide services – Objectives – Proportionality – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Point (f) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) – Lawfulness of processing.#Case C-209/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0027_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#SU and Others v An Coimisiún Pleanála, anciennement An Bord Pleanála and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Directive 2009/147/EC – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Special protection areas – Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project likely to have an effect on a protected site in view of that site’s conservation objectives – Screening – Conservation objectives specific to a special protection area not set.#Joined Cases C-27/25 and C-356/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0523_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Sociedad Civil Catalana, Asociación Cívica y Cultural (SCC) and Ministerio Fiscal v RAS and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the financial interests of the Union – Article 325(1) TFEU – Effective judicial protection in matters covered by EU law – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Accounting liability proceedings – Pursuit of the independence of part of the national territory of a Member State – National amnesty law concerning acts giving rise to liability in respect of public funds – Extinction of liability within a maximum period of two months, without examination of the defence submissions and exculpatory evidence and without hearing all the parties to the proceedings – First paragraph of Article 23 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Stay of the main proceedings by a national court which has submitted a request for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice under Article 267 TFEU.#Case C-523/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0358decided

Postanowienie Trybunału (ósma izba) z dnia 16 lipca 2026 r.#M.O. przeciwko Skarb Państwa - Prezes Sądu Rejonowego dla m. st. Warszawy w Warszawie.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Artykuł 53 § 2 regulaminu postępowania przed Trybunałem – Dyrektywa (UE) 2017/1132 – Ujawnienie i aktualizacja informacji dotyczących spółek – Zaprzestanie pełnienia funkcji przez członków zarządu – Fundacja – Brak możliwości zastosowania – Artykuł 47 Karty praw podstawowych Unii Europejskiej – Brak zastosowania prawa Unii – Oczywista niedopuszczalność.#Sprawa C-358/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0789_INFdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#International Management Group (IMG) contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Responsabilité non contractuelle – Réglementation financière de l’Union – Exécution du budget de l’Union européenne en gestion indirecte par une organisation internationale – Décision refusant à une entité la reconnaissance du statut d’organisation internationale – Préjudice matériel – Perte de chance de conclure avec la Commission européenne des conventions de délégation selon le mode de la gestion indirecte en qualité d’organisation internationale et de percevoir une contribution visant à couvrir les frais administratifs induits – Lien de causalité – Réalité et étendue du préjudice.#Affaire C-789/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0401_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#Elettronica Industriale SpA contre Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Réseaux et services de communications électroniques – Directive 2002/21/CE – Article 9 – Gestion des radiofréquences pour les services de communications électroniques – Principe de neutralité à l’égard des services – Article 9 bis – Réexamen des restrictions aux droits d’utilisation des radiofréquences existants – Mesure nationale imposant à un titulaire de droits d’utilisation de radiofréquences d’utiliser ces radiofréquences conformément aux dispositions du plan national d’attribution des fréquences et ne permettant pas d’exercer des activités différentes – Mesure nationale imposant d’utiliser lesdites radiofréquences exclusivement pour des services de diffusion de télévision numérique terrestre.#Affaire C-401/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026