Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Asylum

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU

All countriesUnited Kingdom · 12,687Ireland · 6,788Austria · 3,733Netherlands · 2,241United States · 2,034Germany · 1,645European Union · 1,412France · 895Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0521decided

Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 15 octobre 2026.#Commission européenne contre Hongrie.#Manquement d’État – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Contrôles aux frontières, asile et immigration – Politique d’immigration – Directive 2002/90/CE – Répression de l’aide à l’entrée, au transit et au séjour irréguliers – Sanctions – Caractère effectif, proportionné et dissuasif.#Affaire C-521/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0571_RESdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 8 octobre 2026.#YO et CT contre Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Politique relative à l’immigration – Droit au regroupement familial – Directive 2003/86/CE – Article 10, paragraphe 3, sous a) – Droit d’un réfugié au regroupement familial avec ses parents – Notion de “mineur non accompagné” – Demande de regroupement familial des parents avec un réfugié mineur devenu majeur au cours de la procédure d’asile – Portée de l’arrêt du 12 avril 2018, A et S (C‑550/16, EU:C:2018:248) – Délai raisonnable pour introduire cette demande – Dies a quo – Droit au respect de la vie privée ou familiale – Intérêt supérieur de l’enfant – Articles 7 et 24 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne.#Affaire C-571/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 October 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0571decided

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 8 octobre 2026.#YO et CT contre Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Politique relative à l’immigration – Droit au regroupement familial – Directive 2003/86/CE – Article 10, paragraphe 3, sous a) – Droit d’un réfugié au regroupement familial avec ses parents – Notion de “mineur non accompagné” – Demande de regroupement familial des parents avec un réfugié mineur devenu majeur au cours de la procédure d’asile – Portée de l’arrêt du 12 avril 2018, A et S (C‑550/16, EU:C:2018:248) – Délai raisonnable pour introduire cette demande – Dies a quo – Droit au respect de la vie privée ou familiale – Intérêt supérieur de l’enfant – Articles 7 et 24 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne.#Affaire C-571/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 October 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0249_RESdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 1er octobre 2026.#Minister van Asiel en Migratie contre UB.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Politique d’asile – Directive 2001/55/CE – Normes minimales pour l’octroi d’une protection temporaire en cas d’afflux massif de personnes déplacées et mesures tendant à assurer un équilibre entre les efforts consentis par les États membres pour accueillir ces personnes et supporter les conséquences de cet accueil – Article 17, paragraphe 2 – Directive 2013/32/UE – Procédures communes pour l’octroi et le retrait de la protection internationale – Octroi de la protection internationale à une personne bénéficiant d’une protection temporaire au titre de la directive 2001/55 – Article 31 – Pratique administrative nationale consistant à suspendre, pendant la période de protection temporaire, le cours du délai prévu pour la prise de décision sur une demande de protection internationale.#Affaire C-249/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0249decided

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 1er octobre 2026.#Minister van Asiel en Migratie contre UB.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Politique d’asile – Directive 2001/55/CE – Normes minimales pour l’octroi d’une protection temporaire en cas d’afflux massif de personnes déplacées et mesures tendant à assurer un équilibre entre les efforts consentis par les États membres pour accueillir ces personnes et supporter les conséquences de cet accueil – Article 17, paragraphe 2 – Directive 2013/32/UE – Procédures communes pour l’octroi et le retrait de la protection internationale – Octroi de la protection internationale à une personne bénéficiant d’une protection temporaire au titre de la directive 2001/55 – Article 31 – Pratique administrative nationale consistant à suspendre, pendant la période de protection temporaire, le cours du délai prévu pour la prise de décision sur une demande de protection internationale.#Affaire C-249/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0511decided

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 24 septembre 2026.#Ministerstvo vnitra contre E. K.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Politique d’asile – Critères et mécanismes de détermination de l’État membre responsable de l’examen d’une demande de protection internationale – Règlement (UE) no 604/2013 – État membre responsable de l’examen d’une demande de protection internationale en vertu de l’article 3, paragraphe 2, premier alinéa, de ce règlement – Demande de protection internationale introduite dans un autre État membre – Article 17 – Clause discrétionnaire – Champ d’application.#Affaire C-511/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0026decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#PQ v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság Dél-alföldi Regionális Igazgatóság and Alkotmányvédelmi Hivatal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the European Union – Article 20 TFEU – Family member of a Union citizen who has never exercised his or her right of freedom of movement – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Threat to national security – Statement by a specialist national authority – Statement of reasons – Access to the file – Classified information – Primacy of EU law.#Case C-26/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 July 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62026CJ0182_RESdecided

Rozsudek Soudního dvora (čtvrtého senátu) ze dne 25. června 2026.#DL v. Minister van Asiel en Migratie.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Naléhavé řízení o předběžné otázce – Přistěhovalecká politika – Navracení státních příslušníků třetích zemí neoprávněně pobývajících v členském státě – Směrnice 2008/115/ES – Článek 3 bod 3 – Cílová země – Článek 5 – Zásada nenavracení – Článek 15 – Zajištění za účelem vyhoštění – Přezkum dodržení podmínek zákonnosti – Okamžik posouzení dodržování zásady nenavracení – Rozhodnutí o navrácení, v němž je určeno více cílových zemí – Zajišťovací opatření – Určení cílové země – Nedostatečná spolupráce neoprávněně pobývajícího státního příslušníka třetí země – Článek 6, čl. 19 odst. 2 a článek 47 Listiny základních práv Evropské unie.#Věc C-182/26 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62026CJ0182decided

Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Cuarta) de 25 de junio de 2026.#DL contra Minister van Asiel en Migratie.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Procedimiento prejudicial de urgencia — Política de inmigración — Retorno de los nacionales de terceros países en situación irregular en un Estado miembro — Directiva 2008/115/CE — Artículo 3, punto 3 — País de destino — Artículo 5 — Principio de no devolución — Artículo 15 — Internamiento a efectos de expulsión — Examen del cumplimiento de los requisitos de legalidad — Momento en el que ha de examinarse el respeto del principio de no devolución — Decisión de retorno en la que se designan varios posibles países de destino — Medida de internamiento — Determinación del país de destino — Falta de cooperación del nacional de un tercer país en situación irregular — Artículos 6, 19, apartado 2, y 47 de la Carta de los Derechos Fundamentales de la Unión Europea.#Asunto C-182/26 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 June 2026

Decision· DCELEX 32026D1439in force

Council Decision (EU) 2026/1439 of 25 June 2026 authorising the opening of negotiations for protocols between the Union and Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein supplementing their respective agreements and protocol concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in those countries, to include rules to enable their participation in Parts II and IV of Regulation (EU) 2024/1351 of the European Parliament and of the Council and in Chapters II and III of Regulation (EU) 2024/1359 of the European Parliament and of the Council

European Union · EUR-Lex · 25 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0198_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 4 juin 2026.#S contre Minister van Asiel en Migratie.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Politique d’asile – Procédures communes pour l’octroi et le retrait de la protection internationale – Directive 2013/32/UE – Article 46 – Droit à un recours effectif – Examen complet et ex nunc – Étendue des pouvoirs de la juridiction de première instance – Examen par la juridiction de première instance des faits – Examen par la juridiction de première instance des besoins de protection internationale.#Affaire C-198/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0440_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 June 2026.#PM and Others v Minister van Asiel en Migratie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Full and ex nunc examination – Extent of the powers of the first-instance court or tribunal – Examination of the facts by the first-instance court or tribunal – Examination of the international protection needs by the first-instance court or tribunal – Refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Standards for the qualification of third-country nationals as beneficiaries of refugee status – Article 2(d) – ‘Well-founded fear of being persecuted’ – Assessment.#Case C-440/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0198decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 June 2026.#S v Minister van Asiel en Migratie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank den Haag zittingsplaats Zwolle.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Full and ex nunc examination – Extent of the powers of the first-instance court or tribunal – Examination of the facts by the first-instance court or tribunal – Examination of the international protection needs by the first-instance court or tribunal.#Case C-198/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0440decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 June 2026.#PM and Others v Minister van Asiel en Migratie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Full and ex nunc examination – Extent of the powers of the first-instance court or tribunal – Examination of the facts by the first-instance court or tribunal – Examination of the international protection needs by the first-instance court or tribunal – Refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Standards for the qualification of third-country nationals as beneficiaries of refugee status – Article 2(d) – ‘Well-founded fear of being persecuted’ – Assessment.#Case C-440/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0621decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 June 2026.#Landkreis Schweinfurt v FB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundessozialgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection – Article 2(g) – Material reception conditions – Article 17(2) – Requirement as to a guaranteed adequate standard of living – Applicant for international protection subject to a transfer decision – Provision of the material reception conditions excluding benefits in kind covering clothing, everyday items and consumables, and without payment of the financial allowance intended to cover basic personal needs – Article 20(1)(c) – Reduction or withdrawal of material reception conditions due to the lodging of a subsequent application – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 2(q) – Concept of ‘subsequent application’ – Applicability – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Procedure for determining the responsible Member State.#Case C-621/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 June 2026

Decision· DCELEX 32026D1213in force

Council Decision (EU) 2026/1213 of 29 May 2026 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Committee of the Parties to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence, at its 20th meeting, concerning conclusions on the implementation of recommendations in respect of certain Parties to that Convention and concerning the election of members of the Group of experts on action against violence against women and domestic violence, with regard to matters related to judicial cooperation in criminal matters, asylum and non-refoulement

European Union · EUR-Lex · 29 May 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0877_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#X and Minister van Asiel en Migratie, anciennement Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v Y.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Articles 6, 8 and 9 – Illegally staying third-country nationals imprisoned for a long term or for life – Possibility of adopting a return decision – Procedural safeguards.#Case C-877/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 May 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0877decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#X and Minister van Asiel en Migratie, anciennement Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v Y.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Articles 6, 8 and 9 – Illegally staying third-country nationals imprisoned for a long term or for life – Possibility of adopting a return decision – Procedural safeguards.#Case C-877/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 May 2026

Proposal· PCCELEX 52026PC0236open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Committee of the Parties to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence, at its 20th meeting, on conclusions addressed to certain Parties on their implementation of that Convention and on the election of members of the Group of Experts on Action against Violence against Women and Domestic Violence, with regard to matters related to judicial cooperation in criminal matters, asylum and non-refoulement

European Union · European Commission · 12 May 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0747_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 May 2026.#KH v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 26 – Access to employment – Article 29 – Social welfare – Equal treatment – Social protection measure and access to employment – Condition of residence for a minimum period of 10 years, the final 2 years of which must have been continuous – Indirect discrimination.#Case C-747/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 May 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0747decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 May 2026.#KH v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Bergamo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 26 – Access to employment – Article 29 – Social welfare – Equal treatment – Social protection measure and access to employment – Condition of residence for a minimum period of 10 years, the final 2 years of which must have been continuous – Indirect discrimination.#Case C-747/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 May 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0050_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 April 2026.#X and Others v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides.#References for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Application for international protection – Article 43 – Border procedure – Classification of a procedure conducted in a place of detention located geographically in the territory of a Member State, but treated by national law as a place at the border – Right to enter the territory of that Member State after a period of four weeks – Article 31(7) – Priority examination of an application for international protection – Directive 2013/33/EU – Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection – Article 8 – Detention in the same place on the basis of two different decisions.#Joined Cases C-50/24 to C-56/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 April 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0050decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 April 2026.#X and Others v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil du Contentieux des Étrangers.#References for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Application for international protection – Article 43 – Border procedure – Classification of a procedure conducted in a place of detention located geographically in the territory of a Member State, but treated by national law as a place at the border – Right to enter the territory of that Member State after a period of four weeks – Article 31(7) – Priority examination of an application for international protection – Directive 2013/33/EU – Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection – Article 8 – Detention in the same place on the basis of two different decisions.#Joined Cases C-50/24 to C-55/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 April 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0202_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#HG v Minister van Asiel en Migratie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Revocation of subsidiary protection status – Public order – Principle of non-refoulement – Possibility of adopting a return decision.#Case C-202/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0202decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#HG v Minister van Asiel en Migratie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Revocation of subsidiary protection status – Public order – Principle of non-refoulement – Possibility of adopting a return decision.#Case C-202/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0819decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#X and Y v État Belge.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Immigration policy – Directive 2003/86/EC – Right to family reunification – Article 13(1) – Obligation to grant every facility for obtaining visas – Visas granted subject to the suspensive condition of the recipients’ appearance in person for verification of their identities and of the authenticity of the documents submitted – Recipients unable to travel to a diplomatic or consular post of the Member State that granted the visas – Obligation for a Member State to ensure that such travel takes place or to facilitate such travel – None.#Case C-819/25 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 March 2026

Decision· DCELEX 32026D0713in force

Council Decision (EU) 2026/713 of 17 March 2026 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Committee of the Parties to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence on the participation of non-governmental organisations as observers in meetings of that Committee, with regard to matters related to judicial cooperation in criminal matters, asylum and non-refoulement

European Union · EUR-Lex · 17 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0489decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) – Procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Possibility to extend the six-month time limit for taking a decision in the event of a large number of applications for international protection lodged simultaneously – Successive extension decisions – Conditions and limits – Article 4(1) – Obligation for Member States to ensure that the determining authority is provided with appropriate means to carry out its tasks.#Case C-489/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0458decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#DO v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Sigmaringen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 3(2) – Article 29 – Transfer of the asylum seeker to the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection – Suspension, by the Member State responsible, of the taking charge and taking back of asylum seekers – Directive (EU) 2013/32 – Article 33 – Inadmissible applications.#Case C-458/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 March 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0458_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#DO v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 3(2) – Article 29 – Transfer of the asylum seeker to the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection – Suspension, by the Member State responsible, of the taking charge and taking back of asylum seekers – Directive (EU) 2013/32 – Article 33 – Inadmissible applications.#Case C-458/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 March 2026

Proposal· PCCELEX 52026PC0103open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Committee of the Parties of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence, on the participation of non-governmental organisations as observers in meetings of the Committee, with regard to matters related to judicial cooperation in criminal matters, asylum and non-refoulement

European Union · European Commission · 23 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0634_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#M.P. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border checks, asylum and immigration – Crossing of external borders of the Member States – Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 – National legislation requiring a national of several third countries who has benefitted from a visa-free regime to present an additional document in order to obtain a temporary residence permit – Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union, of the other part – Direct effect.#Case C-634/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0634decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#M.P. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border checks, asylum and immigration – Crossing of external borders of the Member States – Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 – National legislation requiring a national of several third countries who has benefitted from a visa-free regime to present an additional document in order to obtain a temporary residence permit – Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union, of the other part – Direct effect.#Case C-634/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0718decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#NP v Predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Article 33 – Grounds of inadmissibility – Article 38 – Concept of ‘safe third country’ – Conditions for implementation – Connection between the applicant and the third country concerned – Criteria – Assessment methods – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-718/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 February 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0431_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#W v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Article 23(1) – Access to the information in the file of an applicant for international protection – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Article 4, Article 18 and Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of non-refoulement – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to a fair trial – Investigation in the applicant’s country of origin – Rejection of an application for international protection and adoption of a return decision – Access of the court of first instance and the applicant to information relating to the manner in which the investigation was conducted in the applicant’s country of origin – Scope of the rights of the defence and of the right to an effective remedy – Connection with the principle of non-refoulement.#Case C-431/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0431decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#W v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Roermond.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Article 23(1) – Access to the information in the file of an applicant for international protection – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 4, Article 18 and Article 19(2) – Principle of non-refoulement – Second paragraph of Article 47 – Right to a fair trial – Investigation in the applicant’s country of origin – Rejection of an application for international protection and adoption of a return decision – Access of the court of first instance and the applicant to information relating to the manner in which the investigation was conducted in the applicant’s country of origin – Scope of the rights of the defence and of the right to an effective remedy – Connection with the principle of non-refoulement.#Case C-431/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0742decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#International Protection Appeals Tribunal and Others v L.K.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Article 15(1) – Access to the labour market as an applicant for international protection – Refusal of a request to access the labour market – Reason for the refusal – Delay in the processing of the application for international protection attributable in part to the applicant.#Case C-742/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0184_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#AF, en son nom propre et en qualité de personne exerçant la responsabilité parentale sur l’enfant mineur BF v Ministero dell’Interno - U.T.G. - Prefettura di Milano.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Applicants for international protection – Article 7 – Place of residence – Article 18 – Material reception conditions – Housing – Accommodation centres – Transfer – Applicant’s refusal – Article 20(1)(a) – Reduction of material reception conditions or withdrawal of that benefit in exceptional and duly justified cases – Abandonment of the place of residence without informing the competent authority or without permission – Article 20(4) – Serious breaches of the rules of the accommodation centre – Article 20(5) – Proportionality – Dignified standard of living – Article 21 – Applicants falling within the category of vulnerable persons – Article 23 – Minors – Power of a Member State to withdraw material reception conditions if the applicant refuses to be transferred to another accommodation centre.#Case C-184/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0136decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Alaa Hamoudi v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 – European integrated management of the European Union’s external borders – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations relating to the protection of fundamental rights – Practices of pushback to a third country in the Aegean Sea region – Non-contractual liability of Frontex – Actual and certain damage – Burden of proof – Effective judicial protection – Prima facie evidence – Duty of the General Court of the European Union to investigate the case.#Case C-136/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0136_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Alaa Hamoudi v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 – European integrated management of the European Union’s external borders – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations relating to the protection of fundamental rights – Practices of pushback to a third country in the Aegean Sea region – Non-contractual liability of Frontex – Actual and certain damage – Burden of proof – Effective judicial protection – Prima facie evidence – Duty of the General Court of the European Union to investigate the case.#Case C-136/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0679decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#WS and Others v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 – European integrated border management of the external borders of the European Union – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations to protect fundamental rights – Joint return operation coordinated by Frontex – Frontex’s non-contractual liability – Causal link between the breach of such obligations and the damage suffered.#Case C-679/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Page 1 of 2Next