Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Amendment · Amendement

1525

Amendement 1525 — APRÈS ART. 62 QUINQUIES

rejectedFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

20 September 2018

Last action

5 October 2018 · Rejeté

Status

Rejeté

Sponsors

Nadia Hai, Fadila Khattabi, Fiona Lazaar, Stéphane Buchou, Rodrigue Kokouendo, Didier Baichère, Marie-Christine Verdier-Jouclas, Patrick Vignal, Cécile Rilhac, Cathy Racon-Bouzon, Anissa Khedher, Bertrand Bouyx, Stéphane Testé, Belkhir Belhaddad, Pascal Bois, Albane Gaillot, Jacques Marilossian, Stella Dupont, Françoise Dumas, Philippe Chalumeau, Philippe Chassaing, Alexandra Valetta Ardisson, Marion Lenne, Rémy Rebeyrotte, Yves Daniel, Yolaine de Courson, Valérie Petit, Éric Alauzet, Cédric Roussel, Emmanuelle Fontaine-Domeizel, Delphine Bagarry, Jennifer De Temmerman, Nathalie Sarles, Xavier Paluszkiewicz, Anne Genetet

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

5 October 2018

Official sourceShare

Summary

Après le 6° du I de l’article L. 225‑100‑1 du code de commerce, il est inséré un 7° ainsi rédigé : « 7° Une analyse comportant des indicateurs en matière de lutte contre les discriminations, selon des modalités déterminées par décret en Conseil d’État. »

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 20 September 2018

    Dépôt

    Source: dateDepot

  2. 26 September 2018

    Publication

    Source: datePublication

  3. 5 October 2018

    Rejeté

    Source: dateSort

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.