Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Amendment · Amendement

I-667

Amendement I-667 — APRÈS ART. 16

rejectedFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

9 October 2018

Last action

19 October 2018 · Rejeté

Status

Rejeté

Sponsors

Marc Le Fur, Fabrice Brun, Brigitte Kuster, Jean-Pierre Vigier, Geneviève Levy, Isabelle Valentin, Jean-Pierre Door, Thibault Bazin, Jean-Marie Sermier, Éric Straumann, Julien Dive, Gérard Menuel, Jean-Claude Bouchet, Valérie Bazin-Malgras, Emmanuelle Anthoine, Michel Vialay, Dino Cinieri, Pierre Cordier, Pierre-Henri Dumont, Jean-Louis Masson, Éric Pauget, Charles de la Verpillière, Vincent Descoeur, Mansour Kamardine, Stéphane Viry, Frédéric Reiss, Jean-Jacques Ferrara, Claude de Ganay, Bérengère Poletti, Véronique Louwagie, Robin Reda, Emmanuel Maquet, Jean-François Parigi

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

19 October 2018

Official sourceShare

Summary

I. – Au premier alinéa du I de l’article 790 G du code général des impôts, le mot : « quinze » est remplacé par le mot : « dix ». II. – La perte de recettes pour l’État est compensée à due concurrence par la création d’une taxe additionnelle aux droits mentionnés aux articles 575 et 575 A du code général des impôts.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 9 October 2018

    Dépôt

    Source: dateDepot

  2. 16 October 2018

    Publication

    Source: datePublication

  3. 19 October 2018

    Rejeté

    Source: dateSort

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.