Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Amendment · Amendement

269

Amendement 269 — APRÈS ART. 20

rejectedFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

5 June 2018

Last action

15 June 2018 · Rejeté

Status

Rejeté

Sponsors

Stéphane Viry, Emmanuelle Anthoine, Nathalie Bassire, Valérie Bazin-Malgras, Valérie Beauvais, Jean-Yves Bony, Ian Boucard, Fabrice Brun, Jacques Cattin, François Cornut-Gentille, Rémi Delatte, Vincent Descoeur, Fabien Di Filippo, Jean-Pierre Door, Daniel Fasquelle, Laurent Furst, Jean-Jacques Gaultier, Patrick Hetzel, Valérie Lacroute, Marc Le Fur, Sébastien Leclerc, Geneviève Levy, Gilles Lurton, Emmanuel Maquet, Jean-Louis Masson, Gérard Menuel, Éric Pauget, Bernard Perrut, Alain Ramadier, Frédéric Reiss, Jean-Marie Sermier, Éric Straumann, Jean-Charles Taugourdeau, Martial Saddier, Constance Le Grip, Véronique Louwagie, Arnaud Viala

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

15 June 2018

Official sourceShare

Summary

Le Gouvernement remet au Parlement, avant le 1 er janvier 2025, un rapport évaluant le transfert de la collecte de la contribution unique pour la formation professionnelle et l’apprentissage aux organismes chargés du recouvrement mentionnés à l’article L. 5427‑1 du code du travail.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 5 June 2018

    Dépôt

    Source: dateDepot

  2. 12 June 2018

    Publication

    Source: datePublication

  3. 15 June 2018

    Rejeté

    Source: dateSort

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.