Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Amendment · Amendement

II-CF875

Amendement II-CF875 — APRÈS ART. 57

rejectedFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

29 October 2018

Last action

7 November 2018 · Rejeté

Status

Rejeté

Sponsors

Barbara Pompili, Éric Alauzet, Cécile Rilhac, Saïd Ahamada, Emmanuelle Fontaine-Domeizel, Yves Daniel, Philippe Chalumeau, Laurence Vanceunebrock, Martine Wonner, Alexandra Valetta Ardisson, Annie Chapelier, Véronique Riotton, Delphine Bagarry, Grégory Galbadon, Mireille Robert, Loïc Dombreval, Nathalie Sarles, Nicole Trisse, Adrien Morenas, Sandrine Mörch, Huguette Tiegna, Patrick Vignal, Yannick Haury, Sébastien Nadot, Patrice Perrot, Graziella Melchior, Stéphane Buchou, Stéphanie Kerbarh, Stella Dupont, Bérangère Abba, Marjolaine Meynier-Millefert, Didier Martin, Guillaume Chiche, Jennifer De Temmerman, Sandrine Le Feur, Élisabeth Toutut-Picard, Sonia Krimi, Laurianne Rossi, Michel Delpon, Guillaume Gouffier Valente

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

7 November 2018

Summary

Au plus tard le 1 er  mai 2019, le Gouvernement remet au Parlement un rapport sur l’avancée du plan de déploiement de l’hydrogène pour la transition énergétique et sur son financement pour 2019.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 29 October 2018

    Dépôt

    Source: dateDepot

  2. 6 November 2018

    Publication

    Source: datePublication

  3. 7 November 2018

    Rejeté

    Source: dateSort

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.