Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

France · Amendment · Amendement

CS566

Amendement CS566 — ART. 15

debatedFrance· National Assembly· FR

Introduced

15 September 2023

Last action

21 September 2023 · Non soutenu

Status

Non soutenu

Sponsors

Olivier Marleix, Emmanuelle Anthoine, Thibault Bazin, Valérie Bazin-Malgras, Anne-Laure Blin, Émilie Bonnivard, Jean-Yves Bony, Jean-Luc Bourgeaux, Xavier Breton, Hubert Brigand, Fabrice Brun, Dino Cinieri, Éric Ciotti, Pierre Cordier, Josiane Corneloup, Christelle D'Intorni, Marie-Christine Dalloz, Vincent Descoeur, Fabien Di Filippo, Julien Dive, Francis Dubois, Pierre-Henri Dumont, Nicolas Forissier, Jean-Jacques Gaultier, Annie Genevard, Philippe Gosselin, Justine Gruet, Meyer Habib, Michel Herbillon, Patrick Hetzel, Philippe Juvin, Mansour Kamardine, Marc Le Fur, Véronique Louwagie, Emmanuel Maquet, Alexandra Martin (Alpes-Maritimes), Frédérique Meunier, Maxime Minot, Yannick Neuder, Jérôme Nury, Éric Pauget, Christelle Petex, Alexandre Portier, Aurélien Pradié, Isabelle Périgault, Nicolas Ray, Vincent Rolland

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

21 September 2023

Official sourceShare

Summary

Supprimer cet article.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 15 September 2023

    Dépôt

    Source: dateDepot

  2. 20 September 2023

    Publication

    Source: datePublication

  3. 21 September 2023

    Non soutenu

    Source: dateSort

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

Showing 48 of 60 sponsors and actors.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.